Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jinkyu Yim
dblp:160/2568
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 50% Parallel and multicore computing · 50% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computing › parallel machine learning
3d parallelism |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Optimus-CC: Efficient Large NLP Model Training with 3D Parallelism Aware Communication Compression · ASPLOS (2) 2023 |
Distributed systems › distributed machine learning › distributed training
communication compression |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Optimus-CC: Efficient Large NLP Model Training with 3D Parallelism Aware Communication Compression · ASPLOS (2) 2023 |
Distributed systems › distributed machine learning
distributed training |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Optimus-CC: Efficient Large NLP Model Training with 3D Parallelism Aware Communication Compression · ASPLOS (2) 2023 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computing › parallel communication
inter-node communication |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Optimus-CC: Efficient Large NLP Model Training with 3D Parallelism Aware Communication Compression · ASPLOS (2) 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
communication compression · 1.33d parallelism · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Pipette: Automatic Fine-Grained Large Language Model Training Configurator for Real-World ClustersabstractTraining large language models (LLMs) is known to be challenging because of the huge computational and memory capacity requirements. To address these issues, it is common to use a cluster of GPUs with 3D parallelism, which splits a model along the data batch, pipeline stage, and intra-layer tensor dimensions. However, the use of 3D parallelism produces the additional challenge of finding the optimal number of ways on each dimension and mapping the split models onto the GPUs. Several previous studies have attempted to automatically find the optimal configuration, but many of these lacked several important aspects. For instance, the heterogeneous nature of the interconnect speeds is often ignored. While the peak bandwidths for the interconnects are usually made equal, the actual attained bandwidth varies per link in real-world clusters. Combined with the critical path modeling that does not properly consider the communication, they easily fall into sub-optimal configurations. In addition, they often fail to consider the memory requirement per GPU, often recommending solutions that could not be executed. To address these challenges, we propose Pipette, which is an automatic fine-grained LLM training configurator for real-world clusters. By devising better performance models along with the memory estimator and fine-grained individual GPU assignment, Pipette achieves faster configurations that satisfy the memory constraints. We evaluated Pipette on large clusters to show that it provides a significant speedup over the prior art. Jinkyu Yim, Jaeyong Song 0002, Yerim Choi, Jaebeen Lee, Jaewon Jung 0001, Hongsun Jang, Jinho Lee 0001 |
DATE | 1 |
| 2023 | Optimus-CC: Efficient Large NLP Model Training with 3D Parallelism Aware Communication CompressionabstractIn training of modern large natural language processing (NLP) models, it has become a common practice to split models using 3D parallelism to multiple GPUs. Such technique, however, suffers from a high overhead of inter-node communication. Compressing the communication is one way to mitigate the overhead by reducing the inter-node traffic volume; however, the existing compression techniques have critical limitations to be applied for NLP models with 3D parallelism in that 1) only the data parallelism traffic is targeted, and 2) the existing compression schemes already harm the model quality too much. Jaeyong Song 0002, Jinkyu Yim, Jaewon Jung 0001, Hongsun Jang, Youngsok Kim, Jinho Lee 0001 |
ASPLOS (2) | 2 |