Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Etienne Lord

dblp:160/3220 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
phylogenetics
0.612022
SimPlot++: a Python application for representing sequence similarity and detecting recombination · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular evolution
recombination detection
0.612022
SimPlot++: a Python application for representing sequence similarity and detecting recombination · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis
0.612022
SimPlot++: a Python application for representing sequence similarity and detecting recombination · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequence similarity
0.612022
SimPlot++: a Python application for representing sequence similarity and detecting recombination · Bioinform. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

proportion test · 0.6phi test · 0.6max-chi-squared test · 0.6NSS test · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 SimPlot++: a Python application for representing sequence similarity and detecting recombination
abstract
MOTIVATION: Accurate detection of sequence similarity and homologous recombination are essential parts of many evolutionary analyses. RESULTS: We have developed SimPlot++, an open-source multiplatform application implemented in Python, which can be used to produce publication quality sequence similarity plots using 63 nucleotide and 20 amino acid distance models, to detect intergenic and intragenic recombination events using Φ, Max-χ2, NSS or proportion tests, and to generate and analyze interactive sequence similarity networks. SimPlot++ supports multicore data processing and provides useful distance calculability diagnostics. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SimPlot++ is freely available on GitHub at: https://github.com/Stephane-S/Simplot_PlusPlus, as both an executable file (for Windows) and Python scripts (for Windows/Linux/MacOS).
Stéphane Samson, Etienne Lord, Vladimir Makarenkov
Bioinform.2
2017 Using the stability of objects to determine the number of clusters in datasets
Etienne Lord, Matthieu Willems, François-Joseph Lapointe, Vladimir Makarenkov
Inf. Sci.1
2015 Classification of bioinformatics workflows using weighted versions of partitioning and hierarchical clustering algorithms
abstract
BACKGROUND: Workflows, or computational pipelines, consisting of collections of multiple linked tasks are becoming more and more popular in many scientific fields, including computational biology. For example, simulation studies, which are now a must for statistical validation of new bioinformatics methods and software, are frequently carried out using the available workflow platforms. Workflows are typically organized to minimize the total execution time and to maximize the efficiency of the included operations. Clustering algorithms can be applied either for regrouping similar workflows for their simultaneous execution on a server, or for dispatching some lengthy workflows to different servers, or for classifying the available workflows with a view to performing a specific keyword search. RESULTS: In this study, we consider four different workflow encoding and clustering schemes which are representative for bioinformatics projects. Some of them allow for clustering workflows with similar topological features, while the others regroup workflows according to their specific attributes (e.g. associated keywords) or execution time. The four types of workflow encoding examined in this study were compared using the weighted versions of k-means and k-medoids partitioning algorithms. The Calinski-Harabasz, Silhouette and logSS clustering indices were considered. Hierarchical classification methods, including the UPGMA, Neighbor Joining, Fitch and Kitsch algorithms, were also applied to classify bioinformatics workflows. Moreover, a novel pairwise measure of clustering solution stability, which can be computed in situations when a series of independent program runs is carried out, was introduced. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings based on the analysis of 220 real-life bioinformatics workflows suggest that the weighted clustering models based on keywords information or tasks execution times provide the most appropriate clustering solutions. Using datasets generated by the Armadillo and Taverna scientific workflow management system, we found that the weighted cosine distance in association with the k-medoids partitioning algorithm and the presence-absence workflow encoding provided the highest values of the Rand index among all compared clustering strategies. The introduced clustering stability indices, PS and PSG, can be effectively used to identify elements with a low clustering support.
Etienne Lord, Abdoulaye Baniré Diallo, Vladimir Makarenkov
BMC Bioinform.1