Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andreas Klingler

dblp:160/7772 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-6730-7945ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 86% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 14%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Logic in computer science · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Logic in computer science
categorical semantics
0.922025
The d-Separation Criterion in Categorical Probability · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Hidden Markov Models and the Bayes Filter in Categorical Probability · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian filtering
0.912025
Hidden Markov Models and the Bayes Filter in Categorical Probability · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.912025
Hidden Markov Models and the Bayes Filter in Categorical Probability · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
hidden markov model
0.912025
Hidden Markov Models and the Bayes Filter in Categorical Probability · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
markov chain
0.912025
Hidden Markov Models and the Bayes Filter in Categorical Probability · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning
0.712023
The d-Separation Criterion in Categorical Probability · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › conditional independence
d-separation
0.712023
The d-Separation Criterion in Categorical Probability · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Logic in computer science › categorical semantics
markov categories
0.312025
Hidden Markov Models and the Bayes Filter in Categorical Probability · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

categorical probability · 1.7d-separation criterion · 1.3category theory · 1.3string diagrams · 0.9string diagram · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Hidden Markov Models and the Bayes Filter in Categorical Probability
abstract
We use Markov categories to generalize the basic theory of Markov chains and hidden Markov models to an abstract setting. This comprises characterizations of hidden Markov models in terms of conditional independences and algorithms for Bayesian filtering and smoothing applicable in all Markov categories with conditionals. When instantiated in appropriate Markov categories, these algorithms specialize to existing ones such as the Kalman filter, forward-backward algorithm, and the Rauch–Tung–Striebel smoother. We also prove that the sequence of outputs of our abstract Bayes filter is itself a Markov chain with a concrete formula for its transition maps. There are two main features of this categorical framework. The first is its abstract generality, as manifested in our unified account of hidden Markov models and algorithms for filtering and smoothing in discrete probability, Gaussian probability, measure-theoretic probability, possibilistic nondeterminism and others at the same time. The second feature is the intuitive visual representation of information flow in terms of string diagrams.
Tobias Fritz, Andreas Klingler, Drew McNeely, Areeb Shah-Mohammed, Yuwen Wang 0001
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2
2023 Approximate Pythagoras numbers on ⁎-algebras over C
abstract
The Pythagoras number of a sum of squares is the shortest length among its sums of squares representations. In many algebras, for example real polynomial algebras in two or more variables, there exists no upper bound on the Pythagoras number for all sums of squares. In this paper, we study how Pythagoras numbers in ⁎-algebras over C behave with respect to small perturbations of elements. More precisely, the approximate Pythagoras number of an element is the smallest Pythagoras number among all elements in its ε -ball. We show that these approximate Pythagoras numbers are often significantly smaller than their exact versions, and allow for (almost) dimension-independent upper bounds. Our results use low-rank approximations for Gram matrices of sums of squares and estimates for the operator norm of the Gram map.
Paria Abbasi, Sander Gribling, Andreas Klingler, Tim Netzer
J. Complex.3
2023 The d-Separation Criterion in Categorical Probability
abstract
The d-separation criterion detects the compatibility of a joint probability distribution with a directed acyclic graph through certain conditional independences. In this work, we study this problem in the context of categorical probability theory by introducing a categorical definition of causal models, a categorical notion of d-separation, and proving an abstract version of the d-separation criterion. This approach has two main benefits. First, categorical d-separation is a very intuitive criterion based on topological connectedness. Second, our results apply both to measure-theoretic probability (with standard Borel spaces) and beyond probability theory, including to deterministic and possibilistic networks. It therefore provides a clean proof of the equivalence of local and global Markov properties with causal compatibility for continuous and mixed random variables as well as deterministic and possibilistic variables.
Tobias Fritz, Andreas Klingler
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2