EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Thibault Lesieur
dblp:160/8999
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Distributed computing theory · 50% Information theory · 50% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Mutual information for symmetric rank-one matrix estimation: A proof of the replica formula · NIPS 2016 |
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
approximate message passing |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Mutual information for symmetric rank-one matrix estimation: A proof of the replica formula · NIPS 2016 |
Distributed computing theory
message-passing algorithms |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Mutual information for symmetric rank-one matrix estimation: A proof of the replica formula · NIPS 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spatial coupling · 0.5replica method · 0.5interpolation method · 0.5approximate message passing · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Statistical and computational phase transitions in spiked tensor estimationabstractWe consider tensor factorizations using a generative model and a Bayesian approach. We compute rigorously the mutual information, the Minimal Mean Square Error (MMSE), and unveil information-theoretic phase transitions. In addition, we study the performance of Approximate Message Passing (AMP) and show that it achieves the MMSE for a large set of parameters, and that factorization is algorithmically “easy” in a much wider region than previously believed. It exists, however, a “hard” region where AMP fails to reach the MMSE and we conjecture that no polynomial algorithm will improve on AMP. Thibault Lesieur, Léo Miolane, Marc Lelarge, Florent Krzakala, Lenka Zdeborová |
ISIT | 1 |
| 2016 | Mutual information for symmetric rank-one matrix estimation: A proof of the replica formulaabstractFactorizing low-rank matrices has many applications in machine learning and statistics. For probabilistic models in the Bayes optimal setting, a general expression for the mutual information has been proposed using heuristic statistical physics computations, and proven in few specific cases. Here, we show how to rigorously prove the conjectured formula for the symmetric rank-one case. This allows to express the minimal mean-square-error and to characterize the detectability phase transitions in a large set of estimation problems ranging from community detection to sparse PCA. We also show that for a large set of parameters, an iterative algorithm called approximate message-passing is Bayes optimal. There exists, however, a gap between what currently known polynomial algorithms can do and what is expected information theoretically. Additionally, the proof technique has an interest of its own and exploits three essential ingredients: the interpolation method introduced in statistical physics by Guerra, the analysis of the approximate message-passing algorithm and the theory of spatial coupling and threshold saturation in coding. Our approach is generic and applicable to other open problems in statistical estimation where heuristic statistical physics predictions are available. Jean Barbier, Mohamad Dia, Nicolas Macris, Florent Krzakala, Thibault Lesieur, Lenka Zdeborová |
NIPS | 5 |
| 2015 | Phase transitions in sparse PCAabstractWe study optimal estimation for sparse principal component analysis when the number of non-zero elements is small but on the same order as the dimension of the data. We employ approximate message passing (AMP) algorithm and its state evolution to analyze what is the information theoretically minimal mean-squared error and the one achieved by AMP in the limit of large sizes. For a special case of rank one and large enough density of non-zeros Deshpande and Montanari [1] proved that AMP is asymptotically optimal. We show that both for low density and for large rank the problem undergoes a series of phase transitions suggesting existence of a region of parameters where estimation is information theoretically possible, but AMP (and presumably every other polynomial algorithm) fails. The analysis of the large rank limit is particularly instructive. Thibault Lesieur, Florent Krzakala, Lenka Zdeborová |
ISIT | 1 |