We systematically evaluate a Deep Learning model in a 3D medical image segmentation task. With our model, we address the flaws of manual segmentation: high inter-rater contouring variability and time consumption of the contouring process. The main extension over the existing evaluations is the careful and detailed analysis that could be further generalized on other medical image segmentation tasks. Firstly, we analyze the changes in the inter-rater detection agreement. We show that the model reduces the number of detection disagreements by [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text]. Secondly, we show that the model improves the inter-rater contouring agreement from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] surface Dice Score [Formula: see text]. Thirdly, we show that the model accelerates the delineation process between [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] times [Formula: see text]. Finally, we design the setup of the clinical experiment to either exclude or estimate the evaluation biases; thus, preserving the significance of the results. Besides the clinical evaluation, we also share intuitions and practical ideas for building an efficient DL-based model for 3D medical image segmentation.

The current COVID-19 pandemic overloads healthcare systems, including radiology departments. Though several deep learning approaches were developed to assist in CT analysis, nobody considered study triage directly as a computer science problem. We describe two basic setups: Identification of COVID-19 to prioritize studies of potentially infected patients to isolate them as early as possible; Severity quantification to highlight patients with severe COVID-19, thus direct them to a hospital or provide emergency medical care. We formalize these tasks as binary classification and estimation of affected lung percentage. Though similar problems were well-studied separately, we show that existing methods could provide reasonable quality only for one of these setups. We employ a multitask approach to consolidate both triage approaches and propose a convolutional neural network to leverage all available labels within a single model. In contrast with the related multitask approaches, we show the benefit from applying the classification layers to the most spatially detailed feature map at the upper part of U-Net instead of the less detailed latent representation at the bottom. We train our model on approximately 1500 publicly available CT studies and test it on the holdout dataset that consists of 123 chest CT studies of patients drawn from the same healthcare system, specifically 32 COVID-19 and 30 bacterial pneumonia cases, 30 cases with cancerous nodules, and 31 healthy controls. The proposed multitask model outperforms the other approaches and achieves ROC AUC scores of 0.87±0.01 vs. bacterial pneumonia, 0.93±0.01 vs. cancerous nodules, and 0.97±0.01 vs. healthy controls in Identification of COVID-19, and achieves 0.97±0.01 Spearman Correlation in Severity quantification. We have released our code and shared the annotated lesions masks for 32 CT images of patients with COVID-19 from the test dataset.

Recent Metal Artifacts Reduction (MAR) methods for Computed Tomography are often based on image-to-image convolutional neural networks for adjustment of corrupted sinograms or images themselves. In this paper, we are exploring the capabilities of a multidomain method, which consists of both sinogram correction (projection domain step) and restored image correction (image-domain step). We formulate the first step problem directly as sinogram inpainting, which allows us to use methods of this specific field, such as partial convolutions. Moreover, we propose a synthetic data generation pipeline to avoid problems with overfitting to metal shapes set and an artifacts formation technique. The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art (-75% MSE) improvement in comparison with a classic benchmark - Li-MAR.

Quantification of cerebral white matter hyperintensities (WMH) of presumed vascular origin is of key importance in many neurological research studies. Currently, measurements are often still obtained from manual segmentations on brain MR images, which is a laborious procedure. The automatic WMH segmentation methods exist, but a standardized comparison of the performance of such methods is lacking. We organized a scientific challenge, in which developers could evaluate their methods on a standardized multi-center/-scanner image dataset, giving an objective comparison: the WMH Segmentation Challenge. Sixty T1 + FLAIR images from three MR scanners were released with the manual WMH segmentations for training. A test set of 110 images from five MR scanners was used for evaluation. The segmentation methods had to be containerized and submitted to the challenge organizers. Five evaluation metrics were used to rank the methods: 1) Dice similarity coefficient; 2) modified Hausdorff distance (95th percentile); 3) absolute log-transformed volume difference; 4) sensitivity for detecting individual lesions; and 5) F1-score for individual lesions. In addition, the methods were ranked on their inter-scanner robustness; 20 participants submitted their methods for evaluation. This paper provides a detailed analysis of the results. In brief, there is a cluster of four methods that rank significantly better than the other methods, with one clear winner. The inter-scanner robustness ranking shows that not all the methods generalize to unseen scanners. The challenge remains open for future submissions and provides a public platform for method evaluation.