Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mahsa Taziki

dblp:161/0259 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 50% Efficient and distributed learning · 25% Trustworthy machine learning · 25%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Recommender systems · 100%
Network and information security
2 papers
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems › trustworthy recommendation
privacy-preserving recommendation
0.522017
The Utility and Privacy Effects of a Click · SIGIR 2017
D2P: Distance-Based Differential Privacy in Recommenders · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2015
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic gradient descent
asynchronous SGD
0.312018
Asynchronous Byzantine Machine Learning (the case of SGD) · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
byzantine robustness
0.312018
Asynchronous Byzantine Machine Learning (the case of SGD) · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training
0.312018
Asynchronous Byzantine Machine Learning (the case of SGD) · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent
0.312018
Asynchronous Byzantine Machine Learning (the case of SGD) · ICML 2018
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.212015
D2P: Distance-Based Differential Privacy in Recommenders · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2015
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
byzantine fault tolerance
0.112018
Asynchronous Byzantine Machine Learning (the case of SGD) · ICML 2018
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.112018
Asynchronous Byzantine Machine Learning (the case of SGD) · ICML 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gradient filtering · 0.7gradient dampening · 0.7convergence analysis · 0.7empirical analysis · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Personalized and Private Peer-to-Peer Machine Learning
abstract
The rise of connected personal devices together with privacy concerns call for machine learning algorithms capable of leveraging the data of a large number of agents to learn personalized models under strong privacy requirements. In this paper, we introduce an efficient algorithm to address the above problem in a fully decentralized (peer-to-peer) and asynchronous fashion, with provable convergence rate. We show how to make the algorithm differentially private to protect against the disclosure of information about the personal datasets, and formally analyze the trade-off between utility and privacy. Our experiments show that our approach dramatically outperforms previous work in the non-private case, and that under privacy constraints, we can significantly improve over models learned in isolation.
Aurélien Bellet, Rachid Guerraoui, Mahsa Taziki, Marc Tommasi
AISTATS3
2018 Asynchronous Byzantine Machine Learning (the case of SGD)
abstract
Asynchronous distributed machine learning solutions have proven very effective so far, but always assuming perfectly functioning workers. In practice, some of the workers can however exhibit Byzantine behavior, caused by hardware failures, software bugs, corrupt data, or even malicious attacks. We introduce Kardam, the first distributed asynchronous stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithm that copes with Byzantine workers. Kardam consists of two complementary components: a filtering and a dampening component. The first is scalar-based and ensures resilience against 1/3 Byzantine workers. Essentially, this filter leverages the Lipschitzness of cost functions and acts as a self-stabilizer against Byzantine workers that would attempt to corrupt the progress of SGD. The dampening component bounds the convergence rate by adjusting to stale information through a generic gradient weighting scheme. We prove that Kardam guarantees almost sure convergence in the presence of asynchrony and Byzantine behavior, and we derive its convergence rate. We evaluate Kardam on the CIFAR100 and EMNIST datasets and measure its overhead with respect to non Byzantine-resilient solutions. We empirically show that Kardam does not introduce additional noise to the learning procedure but does induce a slowdown (the cost of Byzantine resilience) that we both theoretically and empirically show to be less than f/n, where f is the number of Byzantine failures tolerated and n the total number of workers. Interestingly, we also empirically observe that the dampening component is interesting in its own right for it enables to build an SGD algorithm that outperforms alternative staleness-aware asynchronous competitors in environments with honest workers.
Georgios Damaskinos, El Mahdi El Mhamdi, Rachid Guerraoui, Rhicheek Patra, Mahsa Taziki
ICML5
2017 The Utility and Privacy Effects of a Click
abstract
Recommenders are becoming one of the main ways to navigate the Internet. They recommend appropriate items to users based on their clicks, i.e., likes, ratings, purchases, etc. These clicks are key to providing relevant recommendations and, in this sense, have a significant utility. Since clicks reflect the preferences of users, they also raise privacy concerns. At first glance, there seems to be an inherent trade-off between the utility and privacy effects of a click. Nevertheless, a closer look reveals that the situation is more subtle: some clicks do improve utility without compromising privacy, whereas others decrease utility while hampering privacy.
Rachid Guerraoui, Anne-Marie Kermarrec, Mahsa Taziki
SIGIR3
2015 D2P: Distance-Based Differential Privacy in Recommenders
abstract
The upsurge in the number of web users over the last two decades has resulted in a significant growth of online information. This information growth calls for recommenders that personalize the information proposed to each individual user. Nevertheless, personalization also opens major privacy concerns. This paper presents D 2 P , a novel protocol that ensures a strong form of differential privacy, which we call distance-based differential privacy, and which is particularly well suited to recommenders. D 2 P avoids revealing exact user profiles by creating altered profiles where each item is replaced with another one at some distance. We evaluate D 2 P analytically and experimentally on MovieLens and Jester datasets and compare it with other private and non-private recommenders.
Rachid Guerraoui, Anne-Marie Kermarrec, Rhicheek Patra, Mahsa Taziki
Proc. VLDB Endow.4