Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Amjad Alkodsi

dblp:161/2373 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-3528-4683ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics
cancer transcriptomics
0.512021
PRISM: recovering cell-type-specific expression profiles from individual composite RNA-seq samples · Bioinform. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology
deconvolution
0.512021
PRISM: recovering cell-type-specific expression profiles from individual composite RNA-seq samples · Bioinform. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology
bioinformatics workflow
0.412019
Anduril 2: upgraded large-scale data integration framework · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology
next-generation sequencing
0.412019
Anduril 2: upgraded large-scale data integration framework · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics
0.312018
Identifying differentially methylated sites in samples with varying tumor purity · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics › DNA methylation
DNA methylation analysis
0.312018
Identifying differentially methylated sites in samples with varying tumor purity · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
tumor heterogeneity
0.112021
PRISM: recovering cell-type-specific expression profiles from individual composite RNA-seq samples · Bioinform. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

maximum likelihood · 0.5latent statistical framework · 0.5scala · 0.4parallelization · 0.4statistical model · 0.3maximum likelihood estimation · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 PRISM: recovering cell-type-specific expression profiles from individual composite RNA-seq samples
abstract
MOTIVATION: A major challenge in analyzing cancer patient transcriptomes is that the tumors are inherently heterogeneous and evolving. We analyzed 214 bulk RNA samples of a longitudinal, prospective ovarian cancer cohort and found that the sample composition changes systematically due to chemotherapy and between the anatomical sites, preventing direct comparison of treatment-naive and treated samples. RESULTS: To overcome this, we developed PRISM, a latent statistical framework to simultaneously extract the sample composition and cell-type-specific whole-transcriptome profiles adapted to each individual sample. Our results indicate that the PRISM-derived composition-free transcriptomic profiles and signatures derived from them predict the patient response better than the composite raw bulk data. We validated our findings in independent ovarian cancer and melanoma cohorts, and verified that PRISM accurately estimates the composition and cell-type-specific expression through whole-genome sequencing and RNA in situ hybridization experiments. AVAILABILITYAND IMPLEMENTATION: https://bitbucket.org/anthakki/prism. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Antti Häkkinen, Kaiyang Zhang, Amjad Alkodsi, Noora Andersson, Erdogan Pekcan Erkan, Katja Kaipio, Tarja Lamminen, Naziha Mansuri, Kaisa Huhtinen, Anna Vähärautio, Olli Carpén, Johanna Hynninen, Sakari Hietanen, Rainer Lehtonen, Sampsa Hautaniemi
Bioinform.3
2019 Anduril 2: upgraded large-scale data integration framework
abstract
SUMMARY: Anduril is an analysis and integration framework that facilitates the design, use, parallelization and reproducibility of bioinformatics workflows. Anduril has been upgraded to use Scala for pipeline construction, which simplifies software maintenance, and facilitates design of complex pipelines. Additionally, Anduril's bioinformatics repository has been expanded with multiple components, and tutorial pipelines, for next-generation sequencing data analysis. AVAILABILITYAND IMPLEMENTATION: Freely available at http://anduril.org. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Alejandra Cervera, Ville Rantanen, Kristian Ovaska, Marko Laakso, Javier Nuñez-Fontarnau, Amjad Alkodsi, Julia Casado, Chiara Facciotto, Antti Häkkinen, Riku Louhimo, Sirkku Karinen, Kaiyang Zhang, Kari Lavikka, Lauri Lyly, Sampsa Hautaniemi
Bioinform.6
2018 Identifying differentially methylated sites in samples with varying tumor purity
abstract
Motivation: DNA methylation aberrations are common in many cancer types. A major challenge hindering comparison of patient-derived samples is that they comprise of heterogeneous collection of cancer and microenvironment cells. We present a computational method that allows comparing cancer methylomes in two or more heterogeneous tumor samples featuring differing, unknown fraction of cancer cells. The method is unique in that it allows comparison also in the absence of normal cell control samples and without prior tumor purity estimates, as these are often unavailable or unreliable in clinical samples. Results: We use simulations and next-generation methylome, RNA and whole-genome sequencing data from two cancer types to demonstrate that the method is accurate and outperforms alternatives. The results show that our method adapts well to various cancer types and to a wide range of tumor content, and works robustly without a control or with controls derived from various sources. Availability and implementation: The method is freely available at https://bitbucket.org/anthakki/dmml. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Antti Häkkinen, Amjad Alkodsi, Chiara Facciotto, Kaiyang Zhang, Katja Kaipio, Sirpa Leppä, Olli Carpén, Seija Grénman, Johanna Hynninen, Sakari Hietanen, Rainer Lehtonen, Sampsa Hautaniemi
Bioinform.2
2015 Comparative analysis of methods for identifying somatic copy number alterations from deep sequencing data
abstract
Somatic copy-number alterations (SCNAs) are an important type of structural variation affecting tumor pathogenesis. Accurate detection of genomic regions with SCNAs is crucial for cancer genomics as these regions contain likely drivers of cancer development. Deep sequencing technology provides single-nucleotide resolution genomic data and is considered one of the best measurement technologies to detect SCNAs. Although several algorithms have been developed to detect SCNAs from whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing data, their relative performance has not been studied. Here, we have compared ten SCNA detection algorithms in both simulated and primary tumor deep sequencing data. In addition, we have evaluated the applicability of exome sequencing data for SCNA detection. Our results show that (i) clear differences exist in sensitivity and specificity between the algorithms, (ii) SCNA detection algorithms are able to identify most of the complex chromosomal alterations and (iii) exome sequencing data are suitable for SCNA detection.
Amjad Alkodsi, Riku Louhimo, Sampsa Hautaniemi
Briefings Bioinform.1