Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jonas Böer
dblp:161/3121
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Interaction techniques and input · 56% Wearable and physiological sensing · 44% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wearable and physiological sensing
electromyography |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Advancing Muscle-Computer Interfaces with High-Density Electromyography · CHI 2015 |
Interaction techniques and input › input sensing › gesture recognition
finger gesture recognition |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Advancing Muscle-Computer Interfaces with High-Density Electromyography · CHI 2015 |
Interaction techniques and input › input device
muscle-computer interface |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Advancing Muscle-Computer Interfaces with High-Density Electromyography · CHI 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
naive bayes classifier · 0.2electrode shift compensation · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Advancing Muscle-Computer Interfaces with High-Density ElectromyographyabstractIn this paper we present our results on using electromyographic (EMG) sensor arrays for finger gesture recognition. Sensing muscle activity allows to capture finger motion without placing sensors directly at the hand or fingers and thus may be used to build unobtrusive body-worn interfaces. We use an electrode array with 192 electrodes to record a high-density EMG of the upper forearm muscles. We present in detail a baseline system for gesture recognition on our dataset, using a naive Bayes classifier to discriminate the 27 gestures. We recorded 25 sessions from 5 subjects. We report an average accuracy of 90% for the within-session scenario, showing the feasibility of the EMG approach to discriminate a large number of subtle gestures. We analyze the effect of the number of used electrodes on the recognition performance and show the benefit of using high numbers of electrodes. Cross-session recognition typically suffers from electrode position changes from session to session. We present two methods to estimate the electrode shift between sessions based on a small amount of calibration data and compare it to a baseline system with no shift compensation. The presented methods raise the accuracy from 59% baseline accuracy to 75% accuracy after shift compensation. The dataset is publicly available. Christoph Amma, Thomas Krings, Jonas Böer, Tanja Schultz |
CHI | 3 |