Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Leroy Anthony Drummond

dblp:161/4365 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 61% High-performance computing · 39%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
High-performance computing › scientific computing systems
climate modeling
0.011998
The UCLA AGCM in High Performance Computing Environments · SC 1998
Parallel and multicore computing
load balancing
0.011998
The UCLA AGCM in High Performance Computing Environments · SC 1998
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computing › parallel optimization
parallel code optimization
0.011998
The UCLA AGCM in High Performance Computing Environments · SC 1998
High-performance computing
supercomputer architecture
0.011998
The UCLA AGCM in High Performance Computing Environments · SC 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

special mathematical functions · 0.0load balancing · 0.0code restructuring · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 A Purely Distributed Approach for Coupling Scientific and Engineering Applications
Vicente Berbegall, Leroy Anthony Drummond, Gumersindo Verdú Martín, Vicente Vidal
ICCSA (5)2
2005 Introduction to the special issue on the Advanced CompuTational Software (ACTS) collection
abstract
No abstract available.
Ronald F. Boisvert, Leroy Anthony Drummond, Osni Marques
ACM Trans. Math. Softw.2
2005 An overview of the Advanced CompuTational Software (ACTS) collection
abstract
The ACTS Collection brings together a number of general-purpose computational tools that were developed by independent research projects mostly funded and supported by the U.S. Department of Energy. These tools tackle a number of common computational issues found in many applications, mainly implementation of numerical algorithms, and support for code development, execution, and optimization. In this article, we introduce the numerical tools in the collection and their functionalities, present a model for developing more complex computational applications on top of ACTS tools, and summarize applications that use these tools. Last, we present a vision of the ACTS project for deployment of the ACTS Collection by the computational sciences community.
Leroy Anthony Drummond, Osni Marques
ACM Trans. Math. Softw.1
1998 The UCLA AGCM in High Performance Computing Environments
abstract
General Circulation Models (GCMs) are at the top of the hierarchy of numerical models that are used to study the Earth's climate. To increase the significance of predictions using GCMs requires ensembles of integrations that in turn demand large amounts of computing resources. GCMs codes are particularly difficult to optimize in view of their heterogeneity. In this paper we focus on code optimization for GCMs of the atmosphere (AGCMs), one of the major components of the climate system. In this paper, we present our efforts in optimizing the parallel UCLA AGCM code. The UCLA AGCM is a state-of-the-art finite-difference model of the global atmosphere. Our optimization efforts include the implementation of load balancing schemes, new physical parameterizations of atmospheric processes, code restructuring and use of special mathematical functions. At the beginning of this work, the overall execution time of the code was 459 seconds per simulated day in 256 nodes of a CRAY T3D. At present, the same model configuration requires 51 seconds per simulated day in 256 nodes of a CRAY T3E-900, which is approximately 9 times faster. The peak model performance is about 40 GFLOPs on 512 T3E-900 nodes. We present results in support of our conclusion that major advances in our ability to carry out longer and more detailed climate simulations depend primarily upon development of more powerful supercomputers and that code optimization, for a particular computer architecture, and development of more efficient algorithms can be nearly as important.
Carlos R. Mechoso, Leroy Anthony Drummond, John D. Farrara, Joseph A. Spahr
SC2