Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ping Guikundan
dblp:161/5072
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 44% Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs · 44% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 13% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
defect tolerance |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Repairing a 3-D Die-Stack Using Available Programmable Logic · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2015 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
superscalar processor |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Repairing a 3-D Die-Stack Using Available Programmable Logic · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.2frequency-domain bypass · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Repairing a 3-D Die-Stack Using Available Programmable Logicabstract3-D die-stacks hold great promise for increasing system performance, but difficulties in testing dies and assembling a 3-D stack are leading to yield issues and slowing the large scale manufacturing of these devices. In many cases, a single defective die will kill the entire stack. To help mitigate this issue, we explore the possibility of repairing a stack that contains a defective die by utilizing an field programmable gate array (FPGA) that has already been included in the stack for other purposes, such as performance enhancement. Specifically, we propose bypassing the defective portion of a nonprogrammable die by replacing the defective functionality with functionality on the FPGA. In this paper, we discuss what additional logic must be added to an Application-Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) die to allow such a bypass to occur. We then show through detailed simulation of a 2.5-D Xilinx FPGA how bypassing of logic can be achieved and throughput maintained even when the two different dies involved operate at different frequencies. Finally, we explore the performance of this technique in a superscalar, out-of-order processor, where different functional units are marked for replacement. Our simulation results show that not only can we salvage a device that would otherwise have to be discarded, but creating multiple copies of the defective partition in the FPGA can allow us to regain performance even when the latency of the units in the FPGA is longer than that of the original defective copy. Kundan Nepal, Soha Alhelaly, Jennifer Dworak, R. Iris Bahar, Theodore W. Manikas, Ping Guikundan |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. | 6 |