EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vijay Huddar
dblp:161/5471
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-7844-4379ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
dense retrieval |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | ReSuMe: Retriever-Summarizer Mutual Enhancement via Reinforcement Learning · WWW 2026 |
Information retrieval
text summarization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | ReSuMe: Retriever-Summarizer Mutual Enhancement via Reinforcement Learning · WWW 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Generative or Discriminative? Revisiting Text Classification in the Era of Transformers · EMNLP 2025 |
Information retrieval
e-commerce search |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Beyond Hard Negatives in Product Search: Semantic Matching Using One-Class Classification (SMOCC) · WSDM 2023 |
Information retrieval
semantic matching |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Beyond Hard Negatives in Product Search: Semantic Matching Using One-Class Classification (SMOCC) · WSDM 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
contrastive learning · 1.7reinforcement learning · 1.0language model fine-tuning · 1.0group relative policy optimization · 1.0transformer · 0.9one-class classification · 0.7hard negative mining · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | ReSuMe: Retriever-Summarizer Mutual Enhancement via Reinforcement LearningabstractWe present ReSuMe, a general framework for mutual enhancement of dense retrieval systems and document summarizers through reinforcement learning. The framework jointly optimizes a language model for generating retrieval-oriented summaries and adapts the retrieval model to these summaries through alternating fine-tuning phases. We employ Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) to fine-tune the language model based on retrieval relevance rather than linguistic quality alone, while the retrieval model is iteratively updated using contrastive learning on the generated summaries. This co-optimization process addresses the fundamental distribution shift problem that arises when retrieval models trained on full documents must operate on synthetic summaries during inference. By progressively reducing this distribution gap, our framework yields two key benefits: improved retrieval performance and a high-quality document summarizer optimized for retrieval tasks. We demonstrate our framework using Contriever on the MS-MARCO dataset, achieving consistent improvements of 13.2% in MRR@10 and 6.7% in Recall@100 over the baseline. The framework is model-agnostic and can be applied to enhance any dense retrieval system while simultaneously producing an effective document summarization model. Owais Makroo, Nikhil Pattisapu, Karan Gupta 0002, Ankit Gandhi, Vijay Huddar, Atul Saroop |
WWW | 5 |
| 2025 | Generative or Discriminative? Revisiting Text Classification in the Era of TransformersabstractSiva Rajesh Kasa, Karan Gupta, Sumegh Roychowdhury, Ashutosh Kumar, Yaswanth Biruduraju, Santhosh Kumar Kasa, Pattisapu Nikhil Priyatam, Arindam Bhattacharya, Shailendra Agarwal, Vijay Huddar. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025. Siva Rajesh Kasa, Karan Gupta 0002, Sumegh Roychowdhury, Yaswanth Biruduraju, Santhosh Kumar Kasa, Nikhil Priyatam Pattisapu, Arindam Bhattacharya, Shailendra Agarwal, Vijay Huddar |
EMNLP | 10 |
| 2023 | Beyond Hard Negatives in Product Search: Semantic Matching Using One-Class Classification (SMOCC)abstractSemantic matching is an important component of a product search pipeline. Its goal is to capture the semantic intent of the search query as opposed to the syntactic matching performed by a lexical matching system. A semantic matching model captures relationships like synonyms, and also captures common behavioral patterns to retrieve relevant results by generalizing from purchase data. They however suffer from lack of availability of informative negative examples for model training. Various methods have been proposed in the past to address this issue based upon hard-negative mining and contrastive learning. Arindam Bhattacharya, Ankit Gandhi, Vijay Huddar, Ankith M. S, Aayush Moroney, Atul Saroop, Rahul Bhagat |
WSDM | 3 |
| 2015 | Classification with imbalance: A similarity-based method for predicting respiratory failureabstractBinary classification based methods are commonly used for designing predictive models in healthcare. A common problem in many healthcare datasets is that of imbalance, where there are far more observations in one class than the other during training. In such conditions, most classifiers do not have good predictive accuracy with respect to the under-represented class. We design a new similarity-based classifier to learn from imbalanced datasets, wherein input features are transformed using similarity with respect to a chosen subset of training points. We empirically demonstrate the superiority of our algorithm over state-of-the-art methods for imbalanced data classification in real and synthetic datasets. We also illustrate the application of our classifier in predicting Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF), a critical complication in Intensive Care Units (ICU), using semi-structured text contained in nursing notes recorded during a patient's ICU stay. Our experiments, on more than 800 patient records show that using our new classifier to learn from text- based features can effectively be used to predict ARF and, potentially, other complications in ICUs. Harsh Shrivastava 0001, Vijay Huddar, Sakyajit Bhattacharya, Vaibhav Rajan |
BIBM | 2 |