Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jean F. Liénard

dblp:161/9059 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-4279-4980ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Web and mobile security · 77% Privacy and data protection · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational social science and digital humanities › platform governance
content moderation
0.812024
Beyond the Guidelines: Assessing Meta's Political Ad Moderation in the EU · IMC 2024
Computational social science and digital humanities
platform governance
0.812024
Beyond the Guidelines: Assessing Meta's Political Ad Moderation in the EU · IMC 2024
Web and mobile security
online advertising
0.812024
Beyond the Guidelines: Assessing Meta's Political Ad Moderation in the EU · IMC 2024
Privacy and data protection
regulatory compliance
0.212024
Beyond the Guidelines: Assessing Meta's Political Ad Moderation in the EU · IMC 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical estimation · 1.5dataset analysis · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Beyond the Guidelines: Assessing Meta's Political Ad Moderation in the EU
abstract
This study examines Meta's enforcement of its political advertising policies across 16 European Union countries. Leveraging a comprehensive dataset provided by Meta under the European Digital Services Act, encompassing all ads targeting EU countries, our analysis exposes shortcomings in Meta's ad moderation. In particular, over 60% of the ads moderated as political by Meta do not fall under Meta's guidelines. Also, we estimate that only 7.7% of undeclared political ads, i.e., political ads that are not declared as such by advertisers, undergo moderation by Meta. These results highlight substantial deficiencies in Meta's regulation of political advertisements, underscoring the need for enhanced measures to safeguard democratic discourse.
Paul Bouchaud, Jean F. Liénard
IMC2