Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexander Yucovich
dblp:161/9940
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Storage systems · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Coding theory · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Storage systems › flash and SSD
flash memory |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | An Analysis of Flash Page Reuse With WOM Codes · ACM Trans. Storage 2018 |
Storage systems › flash and SSD › flash memory management
flash translation layer |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | An Analysis of Flash Page Reuse With WOM Codes · ACM Trans. Storage 2018 |
Storage systems › flash and SSD › flash memory management
garbage collection |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | An Analysis of Flash Page Reuse With WOM Codes · ACM Trans. Storage 2018 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › storage coding › write-once memory
write-once memory codes |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | An Analysis of Flash Page Reuse With WOM Codes · ACM Trans. Storage 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hardware evaluation · 0.7analytical modeling · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | On the decoding error weight of one or two deletion channels
Omer Sabary, Daniella Bar-Lev, Yotam Gershon, Alexander Yucovich, Eitan Yaakobi |
Des. Codes Cryptogr. | 4 |
| 2020 | The Error Probability of Maximum-Likelihood Decoding over Two Deletion/Insertion ChannelsabstractThis paper studies the problem of reconstructing a word given several of its noisy copies. This setup is motivated by several applications, among them is reconstructing strands in DNA-based storage systems. Under this paradigm, a word is transmitted over some fixed number of identical independent channels and the goal of the decoder is to output the transmitted word or some close approximation. The main focus of this paper is the case of two deletion channels and studying the error probability of the maximum-likelihood (ML) decoder under this setup. First, it is discussed how the ML decoder operates. Then, we observe that the dominant error patterns are deletions in the same run or errors resulting from alternating sequences. Based on these observations, it is derived that the error probability of the ML decoder is roughly (3q - 1)/(q - 1) p2, when the transmitted word is any q-ary sequence and p is the channel's deletion probability. We also study the cases when the transmitted word belongs to the Varshamov Tenengolts (VT) code or the shifted VT code. Lastly, the insertion channel is studied as well. These theoretical results are verified by corresponding simulations. Omer Sabary, Eitan Yaakobi, Alexander Yucovich |
ISIT | 3 |
| 2018 | An Analysis of Flash Page Reuse With WOM CodesabstractFlash memory is prevalent in modern servers and devices. Coupled with the scaling down of flash technology, the popularity of flash memory motivates the search for methods to increase flash reliability and lifetime. Erasures are the dominant cause of flash cell wear, but reducing them is challenging because flash is a write-once medium— memory cells must be erased prior to writing. An approach that has recently received considerable attention relies on write-once memory (WOM) codes, designed to accommodate additional writes on write-once media. However, the techniques proposed for reusing flash pages with WOM codes are limited in their scope. Many focus on the coding theory alone, whereas others suggest FTL designs that are application specific, or not applicable due to their complexity, overheads, or specific constraints of multilevel cell (MLC) flash. This work is the first that addresses all aspects of page reuse within an end-to-end analysis of a general-purpose FTL on MLC flash. We use a hardware evaluation setup to directly measure the short- and long-term effects of page reuse on SSD durability and energy consumption, and show that FTL design must explicitly take them into account. We then provide a detailed analytical model for deriving the optimal garbage collection policy for such FTL designs, and for predicting the benefit from reuse on realistic hardware and workload characteristics. Gala Yadgar, Eitan Yaakobi, Fabio Margaglia, Yue Li 0001, Alexander Yucovich, Nachum Bundak, Lior Gilon, Nir Yakovi, Assaf Schuster, André Brinkmann |
ACM Trans. Storage | 5 |
| 2015 | When do WOM codes improve the erasure factor in flash memories?abstractFlash memory is a write-once medium in which re-programming cells requires first erasing the block that contains them. The lifetime of the flash is a function of the number of block erasures and can be as small as several thousands. To reduce the number of block erasures, pages, which are the smallest write unit, are rewritten out-of-place in the memory. A Write-once memory (WOM) code is a coding scheme which enables to write multiple times to the block before an erasure. However, these codes come with significant rate loss. For example, the rate for writing twice (with the same rate) is at most 0.77. In this paper, we study WOM codes and their tradeoff between rate loss and reduction in the number of block erasures, when pages are written uniformly at random. First, we introduce a new measure, called erasure factor, that reflects both the number of block erasures and the amount of data that can be written on each block. A key point in our analysis is that this tradeoff depends upon the specific implementation of WOM codes in the memory. We consider two systems that use WOM codes; a conventional scheme that was commonly used, and a new recent design that preserves the overall storage capacity. While the first system can improve the erasure factor only when the storage rate is at most 0.6442, we show that the second scheme always improves this figure of merit. Eitan Yaakobi, Alexander Yucovich, Gal Maor, Gala Yadgar |
ISIT | 2 |