Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Leo Kärkkäinen
dblp:162/0143
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0001-8228-6265ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 67% Generative modeling · 33% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
autoregressive model |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Networks as Generative Models · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
bidirectional recurrent network |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Networks as Generative Models · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Networks as Generative Models · NIPS 2015 |
High-performance computing
code optimization |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Lattice QCD on the IBM Scalable POWERParallel Systems SP2 · SC 1995 |
High-performance computing › scientific computing systems
lattice quantum chromodynamics |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Lattice QCD on the IBM Scalable POWERParallel Systems SP2 · SC 1995 |
High-performance computing
performance optimization at scale |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Lattice QCD on the IBM Scalable POWERParallel Systems SP2 · SC 1995 |
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Lattice QCD on the IBM Scalable POWERParallel Systems SP2 · SC 1995 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural autoregressive distribution estimation · 0.2generative stochastic network · 0.2bayesian inference · 0.2sparse system inversion · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Pulse transit time estimation of aortic pulse wave velocity and blood pressure using machine learning and simulated training dataabstractRecent developments in cardiovascular modelling allow us to simulate blood flow in an entire human body. Such model can also be used to create databases of virtual subjects, with sizes limited only by computational resources. In this work, we study if it is possible to estimate cardiovascular health indices using machine learning approaches. In particular, we carry out theoretical assessment of estimating aortic pulse wave velocity, diastolic and systolic blood pressure and stroke volume using pulse transit/arrival timings derived from photopletyshmography signals. For predictions, we train Gaussian process regression using a database of virtual subjects generated with a cardiovascular simulator. Simulated results provides theoretical assessment of accuracy for predictions of the health indices. For instance, aortic pulse wave velocity can be estimated with a high accuracy (r > 0.9) when photopletyshmography is measured from left carotid artery using a combination of foot-to-foot pulse transmit time and peak location derived for the predictions. Similar accuracy can be reached for diastolic blood pressure, but predictions of systolic blood pressure are less accurate (r > 0.75) and the stroke volume predictions are mostly contributed by heart rate. Janne M. J. Huttunen, Leo Kärkkäinen, Harri Lindholm |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 2 |
| 2015 | Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Networks as Generative ModelsabstractBidirectional recurrent neural networks (RNN) are trained to predict both in the positive and negative time directions simultaneously. They have not been used commonly in unsupervised tasks, because a probabilistic interpretation of the model has been difficult. Recently, two different frameworks, GSN and NADE, provide a connection between reconstruction and probabilistic modeling, which makes the interpretation possible. As far as we know, neither GSN or NADE have been studied in the context of time series before.As an example of an unsupervised task, we study the problem of filling in gaps in high-dimensional time series with complex dynamics. Although unidirectional RNNs have recently been trained successfully to model such time series, inference in the negative time direction is non-trivial. We propose two probabilistic interpretations of bidirectional RNNs that can be used to reconstruct missing gaps efficiently. Our experiments on text data show that both proposed methods are much more accurate than unidirectional reconstructions, although a bit less accurate than a computationally complex bidirectional Bayesian inference on the unidirectional RNN. We also provide results on music data for which the Bayesian inference is computationally infeasible, demonstrating the scalability of the proposed methods. Mathias Berglund, Tapani Raiko, Mikko Honkala, Leo Kärkkäinen, Akos Vetek, Juha Karhunen |
NIPS | 4 |
| 1995 | Lattice QCD on the IBM Scalable POWERParallel Systems SP2abstractA 512 node IBM Scalable POWERParallel Systems SP2 was installed at the Cornell Theory Center in October 1994. During the past couple of months we have been porting and optimizing code for carrying out lattice QCD calculations. Present performance is far from ideal, however, and optimization efforts are still under way. The rate limiting step in our code involves a rather generic inversion of a large, sparse system, based on a partial differential equation in a multidimensional space. The insights we have gained so far may be useful in diagnosing performance in a wide class of applications. Claude Bernard, Carleton DeTar, Steven A. Gottlieb, Urs M. Heller, James E. Hetrick, Naruhito Ishizuka, Leo Kärkkäinen, Steven R. Lantz, Kari Rummukainen, Robert L. Sugar, Doug Toussaint, Matthew Wingate |
SC | 7 |