Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Moncef Mechri

dblp:162/1199 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 56% Energy-efficient computing · 28% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 8%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation
analytical modeling
0.212016
Analytical Processor Performance and Power Modeling Using Micro-Architecture Independent Characteristics · IEEE Trans. Computers 2016
Energy-efficient computing
power modeling
0.212016
Analytical Processor Performance and Power Modeling Using Micro-Architecture Independent Characteristics · IEEE Trans. Computers 2016
Performance modeling and evaluation
processor performance modeling
0.212016
Analytical Processor Performance and Power Modeling Using Micro-Architecture Independent Characteristics · IEEE Trans. Computers 2016
Electronic design automation
design space exploration
0.112016
Analytical Processor Performance and Power Modeling Using Micro-Architecture Independent Characteristics · IEEE Trans. Computers 2016
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › superscalar processor
superscalar out-of-order processor
0.112016
Analytical Processor Performance and Power Modeling Using Micro-Architecture Independent Characteristics · IEEE Trans. Computers 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cycle-level simulation · 0.2analytical modeling · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Analytical Processor Performance and Power Modeling Using Micro-Architecture Independent Characteristics
abstract
Optimizing processors for (a) specific application(s) can substantially improve energy-efficiency. With the end of Dennard scaling, and the corresponding reduction in energy-efficiency gains from technology scaling, such approaches may become increasingly important. However, designing application-specific processors requires fast design space exploration tools to optimize for the targeted application(s). Analytical models can be a good fit for such design space exploration as they provide fast performance and power estimates and insight into the interaction between an application's characteristics and the micro-architecture of a processor. Unfortunately, prior analytical models for superscalar out-of-order processors require micro-architecture dependent inputs, such as cache miss rates, branch miss rates and memory-level parallelism. This requires profiling the applications for each cache and branch predictor configuration of interest, which is far more time-consuming than evaluating the analytical performance models. In this work we present amicro-architecture independentprofiler and associated analytical models that allow us to produce performanceandpower estimates across a large superscalar out-of-order processor design space almost instantaneously. We show that using a micro-architecture independent profile leads to a speedup of 300$\times$compared to detailed simulation for our evaluated design space. Over a large design space, the model has a 9.3 percent average error for performance and a 4.3 percent average error for power, compared to detailed cycle-level simulation. The model is able to accurately determine the optimal processor configuration for different applications under power or performance constraints, and provides insight into performance through cycle stacks.
Sam Van den Steen, Stijn Eyerman, Sander De Pestel, Moncef Mechri, Trevor E. Carlson, David Black-Schaffer, Erik Hagersten, Lieven Eeckhout
IEEE Trans. Computers4
2015 Micro-architecture independent analytical processor performance and power modeling
abstract
Optimizing processors for specific application(s) can substantially improve energy-efficiency. With the end of Dennard scaling, and the corresponding reduction in energyefficiency gains from technology scaling, such approaches may become increasingly important. However, designing applicationspecific processors require fast design space exploration tools to optimize for the targeted application(s). Analytical models can be a good fit for such design space exploration as they provide fast performance estimations and insight into the interaction between an application's characteristics and the micro-architecture of a processor. Unfortunately, current analytical models require some microarchitecture dependent inputs, such as cache miss rates, branch miss rates and memory-level parallelism. This requires profiling the applications for each cache and branch predictor configuration, which is far more time-consuming than evaluating the actual performance models. In this work we present a micro-architecture independent profiler and associated analytical models that allow us to produce performance and power estimates across a large design space almost instantaneously. We show that using a micro-architecture independent profile leads to a speedup of 25× for our evaluated design space, compared to an analytical model that uses micro-architecture dependent profiles. Over a large design space, the model has a 13% error for performance and a 7% error for power, compared to cycle-level simulation. The model is able to accurately determine the optimal processor configuration for different applications under power or performance constraints, and it can provide insight into performance through cycle stacks.
Sam Van den Steen, Sander De Pestel, Moncef Mechri, Stijn Eyerman, Trevor E. Carlson, David Black-Schaffer, Erik Hagersten, Lieven Eeckhout
ISPASS3