Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Frechtling

dblp:162/5784 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation › numerical algorithms › numerical error analysis
round-off error analysis
0.212015
MCALIB: Measuring Sensitivity to Rounding Error with Monte Carlo Programming · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 2015
Compilers and program optimization › program transformation
source-to-source transformation
0.112015
MCALIB: Measuring Sensitivity to Rounding Error with Monte Carlo Programming · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

source-to-source compilation · 0.7monte-carlo arithmetic · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 MCALIB: Measuring Sensitivity to Rounding Error with Monte Carlo Programming
abstract
Runtime analysis provides an effective method for measuring the sensitivity of programs to rounding errors. To date, implementations have required significant changes to source code, detracting from their widespread application. In this work, we present an open source system that automates the quantitative analysis of floating point rounding errors through the use of C-based source-to-source compilation and a Monte Carlo arithmetic library. We demonstrate its application to the comparison of algorithms, detection of catastrophic cancellation, and determination of whether single precision floating point provides sufficient accuracy for a given application. Methods for obtaining quantifiable measurements of sensitivity to rounding error are also detailed.
Michael Frechtling, Philip H. W. Leong
ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst.1