Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Richard Garcia-Lebron
dblp:162/9080 · also Richard B. Garcia-Lebron
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 67% Algorithms and data structures · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Graph algorithms and graph theory › centrality
edge centrality |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Spanning Edge Centrality: Large-scale Computation and Applications · WWW 2015 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › network analysis
large-scale graph analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Spanning Edge Centrality: Large-scale Computation and Applications · WWW 2015 |
Algorithms and data structures › polynomial-time algorithms
near-linear time algorithms |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Spanning Edge Centrality: Large-scale Computation and Applications · WWW 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
linear system solver · 0.2approximation algorithm · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Spanning Edge Centrality: Large-scale Computation and ApplicationsabstractThe spanning centrality of an edge e in an undirected graph G is the fraction of the spanning trees of G that contain e. Despite its appealing definition and apparent value in certain applications in computational biology, spanning centrality hasn't so far received a wider attention as a measure of edge centrality. We may partially attribute this to the perceived complexity of computing it, which appears to be prohibitive for very large networks. Contrary to this intuition, spanning centrality can in fact be approximated arbitrary well by very efficient near-linear time algorithms due to Spielman and Srivastava, combined with progress in linear system solvers. In this article we bring theory into practice, with careful and optimized implementations that allow the fast computation of spanning centrality in very large graphs with millions of nodes. With this computational tool in our disposition, we demonstrate experimentally that spanning centrality is in fact a useful tool for the analysis of large networks. Specifically, we show that, relative to common centrality measures, spanning centrality is more effective in identifying edges whose removal causes a higher disruption in an information propagation procedure, while being very resilient to noise, in terms of both the edges scores and the resulting edge ranking. Charalampos Mavroforakis, Richard Garcia-Lebron, Ioannis Koutis, Evimaria Terzi |
WWW | 2 |