We develop a framework to quantify predictive uncertainty in survival analysis, providing a reliable lower predictive bound (LPB) for the true, unknown patient survival time. Recently, conformal prediction has been used to construct such valid LPBs for *type-I right-censored data*, with the guarantee that the bound holds with high probability. Crucially, under the type-I setting, the censoring time is observed for all data points. As such, informative LPBs can be constructed by framing the calibration as an estimation task with covariate shift, relying on the conditionally independent censoring assumption. This paper expands the conformal toolbox for survival analysis, with the goal of handling the ubiquitous *general right-censored setting*, in which either the censoring or survival time is observed, but not both. The key challenge here is that the calibration cannot be directly formulated as a covariate shift problem anymore. Yet, we show how to construct LPBs with distribution-free finite-sample guarantees, under the same assumptions as conformal approaches for type-I censored data. Experiments demonstrate the informativeness and validity of our methods in simulated settings and showcase their practical utility using several real-world datasets.

Multidimensional scaling (MDS) is a dimensionality reduction tool used for information analysis, data visualization and manifold learning. Most MDS procedures embed data points in low-dimensional euclidean (flat) domains, such that distances between the points are as close as possible to given inter-point dissimilarities. We present an efficient solver for classical scaling, a specific MDS model, by extrapolating the information provided by distances measured from a subset of the points to the remainder. The computational and space complexities of the new MDS methods are thereby reduced from quadratic to quasi-linear in the number of data points. Incorporating both local and global information about the data allows us to construct a low-rank approximation of the inter-geodesic distances between the data points. As a by-product, the proposed method allows for efficient computation of geodesic distances.

Canonical forms attempt to factor out a non-rigid shape’s pose, giving a pose-neutral shape. This opens up the possibility of using methods originally designed for rigid shape retrieval for the task of non-rigid shape retrieval. We extend our recent benchmark for testing canonical form algorithms. Our new benchmark is used to evaluate a greater number of state-of-the-art canonical forms, on five recent non-rigid retrieval datasets, within two different retrieval frameworks. A total of fifteen different canonical form methods are compared. We find that the difference in retrieval accuracy between different canonical form methods is small, but varies significantly across different datasets. We also find that efficiency is the main difference between the methods.

The Gromov-Hausdorff (GH) distance is traditionally used for measuring distances between metric spaces. It was adapted for non-rigid shape comparison and matching of isometric surfaces, and is defined as the minimal distortion of embedding one surface into the other, while the optimal correspondence can be described as the map that minimizes this distortion. Solving such a minimization is a hard combinatorial problem that requires precomputation and storing of all pairwise geodesic distances for the matched surfaces. A popular way for compact representation of functions on surfaces is by projecting them into the leading eigenfunctions of the Laplace-Beltrami Operator (LBO). When truncated, the basis of the LBO is known to be the optimal for representing functions with bounded gradient in a min-max sense. Methods such as Spectral-GMDS exploit this idea to simplify and efficiently approximate a minimization related to the GH distance by operating in the truncated spectral domain, and obtain state of the art results for matching of nearly isometric shapes. However, when considering only a specific set of functions on the surface, such as geodesic distances, an optimized basis could be considered as an even better alternative. Moreover, current simplifications of approximating the GH distance introduce errors due to low rank approximations and relaxations of the permutation matrices. Here, we define the geodesic distance basis, which is optimal for compact approximation of geodesic distances, in terms of Frobenius norm. We use the suggested basis to extract the Geodesic Distance Descriptor (GDD), which encodes the geodesic distances information as a linear combination of the basis functions. We then show how these ideas can be used to efficiently and accurately approximate the metric spaces matching problem with almost no loss of information. We incorporate recent methods for efficient approximation of the proposed basis and descriptor without actually computing and storing all geodesic distances. These observations are used to construct a very simple and efficient procedure for shape correspondence. Experimental results show that the GDD improves both accuracy and efficiency of state of the art shape matching procedures.

Multidimensional-scaling (MDS) is an information analysis tool. It involves the evaluation of distances between data points, which is a quadratic space-time problem. Then, MDS procedures find an embedding of the points in a low dimensional Euclidean (flat) domain, optimizing for the similarity of inter-points distances. We present an efficient solver for Classical Scaling (a specific MDS model) by extending the distances measured from a subset of the points to the rest, while exploiting the smoothness property of the distance functions. The smoothness is measured by the L2 norm of the Laplace-Beltrami operator applied to the unknown distance function. The Laplace Beltrami reflects the local differential relations between points, and can be computed in linear time. Classical-scaling is thereby reformulated into a quasi-linear space-time complexities procedure.