Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gianmarco Mengaldo

dblp:163/0832 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-0157-5477ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 54% Trustworthy machine learning · 38% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 9%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Computational social science and digital humanities · 74% Computational finance and economics · 26%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › causal machine learning
counterfactual generation
0.912025
Deriving Strategic Market Insights with Large Language Models: A Benchmark for Forward Counterfactual Generation · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › generalization to unseen classes
cross-category generalization
0.312025
Towards Robust ESG Analysis Against Greenwashing Risks: Aspect-Action Analysis with Cross-Category Generalization · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.312025
Towards Robust ESG Analysis Against Greenwashing Risks: Aspect-Action Analysis with Cross-Category Generalization · ACL (1) 2025
Computational finance and economics
financial market analysis
0.312025
Deriving Strategic Market Insights with Large Language Models: A Benchmark for Forward Counterfactual Generation · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

benchmark construction · 1.7LLM prompting · 1.7metaphor detection · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Language models for environmental, social, and governance analysis: A review
Kelvin Du, Rui Mao 0010, Frank Z. Xing, Gianmarco Mengaldo, Erik Cambria
Inf. Process. Manag.4
2025 Towards Robust ESG Analysis Against Greenwashing Risks: Aspect-Action Analysis with Cross-Category Generalization
abstract
Sustainability reports are key for evaluating companies' environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance.To analyze these reports, NLP approaches can efficiently extract ESG insights at scale.However, even the most advanced NLP methods lack robustness against ESG content that is greenwashed -i.e.sustainability claims that are misleading, exaggerated, and fabricated.Accordingly, existing NLP approaches often extract insights that reflect misleading or exaggerated sustainability claims rather than objective ESG performance.To tackle this issue, we introduce A3CG -Aspect-Action Analysis with Cross-Category Generalization, as a novel dataset to improve the robustness of ESG analysis amid the prevalence of greenwashing.By explicitly linking sustainability aspects with their associated actions, A3CG facilitates a more fine-grained and transparent evaluation of sustainability claims, ensuring that insights are grounded in verifiable actions rather than vague or misleading rhetoric.Additionally, A3CG emphasizes cross-category generalization.This ensures robust model performance in aspectaction analysis even when companies change their reports to selectively favor certain sustainability areas.Through experiments on A3CG, we analyze state-of-the-art supervised models and LLMs, uncovering their limitations and outlining key directions for future research.
Keane Ong, Rui Mao 0010, Deeksha Varshney, Erik Cambria, Gianmarco Mengaldo
ACL (1)5
2025 Deriving Strategic Market Insights with Large Language Models: A Benchmark for Forward Counterfactual Generation
abstract
Counterfactual reasoning typically involves considering alternatives to actual events.While often applied to understand past events, a distinct form-forward counterfactual reasoningfocuses on anticipating plausible future developments.This type of reasoning is invaluable in dynamic financial markets, where anticipating market developments can powerfully unveil potential risks and opportunities for stakeholders, guiding their decision-making.However, performing this at scale is challenging due to the cognitive demands involved, underscoring the need for automated solutions.LLMs offer promise, but remain unexplored for this application.To address this gap, we introduce a novel benchmark, FIN-FORCE-FINancial FORward Counterfactual Evaluation.By curating financial news headlines and providing structured evaluation, FIN-FORCE supports LLM based forward counterfactual generation.This paves the way for scalable and automated solutions for exploring and anticipating future market developments, thereby providing structured insights for decision-making.Through experiments on FIN-FORCE, we evaluate state-of-theart LLMs and counterfactual generation methods, analyzing their limitations and proposing insights for future research.We release the benchmark, supplementary data and all experimental codes at the following link
Keane Ong, Rui Mao 0010, Deeksha Varshney, Paul Pu Liang, Erik Cambria, Gianmarco Mengaldo
EMNLP6
2024 Understanding Public Perception Towards Weather Disasters Through the Lens of Metaphor
Rui Mao 0010, Qika Lin, Qiawen Liu, Gianmarco Mengaldo, Erik Cambria
IJCAI4