Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pengxiang Cheng 0001
dblp:163/2279-1
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-9762-5159ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Language models and text generation · 59% Information extraction and text analysis · 13% Efficient and distributed learning · 11% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Improving Instruct Models for Free: A Study on Partial Adaptation · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Improving Instruct Models for Free: A Study on Partial Adaptation · EMNLP 2025 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models › sparse retrieval
learned sparse retrieval |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | An Alternative to FLOPS Regularization to Effectively Productionize SPLADE-Doc · SIGIR 2025 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | An Alternative to FLOPS Regularization to Effectively Productionize SPLADE-Doc · SIGIR 2025 |
Information retrieval
search engines |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | An Alternative to FLOPS Regularization to Effectively Productionize SPLADE-Doc · SIGIR 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge engineering
knowledge integration |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Models · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model merging |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Models · ICLR 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Attending to Entities for Better Text Understanding · AAAI 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic role labeling
implicit argument prediction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Implicit Argument Prediction as Reading Comprehension · AAAI 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
reading comprehension modeling |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Implicit Argument Prediction as Reading Comprehension · AAAI 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic role labeling |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Implicit Argument Prediction as Reading Comprehension · AAAI 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction following |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Improving Instruct Models for Free: A Study on Partial Adaptation · EMNLP 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
partial adaptation · 0.9instruction tuning · 0.9FLOPS regularization · 0.9DF-FLOPS · 0.9weight merging · 0.7knowledge fusion · 0.7self-attention · 0.4coreference supervision · 0.4pointer network · 0.4multi-hop computation · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Improving Instruct Models for Free: A Study on Partial AdaptationabstractInstruct models, obtained from various instruction tuning or post-training steps, are commonly deemed superior and more usable than their base counterpart.While the model gains instruction following ability, instruction tuning may lead to forgetting the knowledge from pre-training or it may encourage the model to become overly conversational or verbose.This, in turn, can lead to degradation of in-context few-shot learning performance.In this work, we study the performance trajectory between base and instruct models by scaling down the strength of instruction-tuning via the partial adaption method.We show that, across several model families and model sizes, reducing the strength of instruction-tuning results in material improvement on a few-shot in-context learning benchmark covering a variety of classic natural language tasks.This comes at the cost of losing some degree of instruction following ability as measured by AlpacaEval.Our study shines light on the potential trade-off between in-context learning and instruction following abilities that is worth considering in practice. Ozan Irsoy, Pengxiang Cheng 0001, Jennifer L. Chen, Daniel Preotiuc-Pietro, Shiyue Zhang 0001, Duccio Pappadopulo |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2025 | An Alternative to FLOPS Regularization to Effectively Productionize SPLADE-DocabstractLearned Sparse Retrieval (LSR) models encode text as weighted term vectors, which need to be sparse to leverage inverted index structures during retrieval. SPLADE, the most popular LSR model, uses FLOPS regularization to encourage vector sparsity during training. However, FLOPS regularization does not ensure sparsity among terms-only within a given query or document. Terms with very high Document Frequencies (DFs) substantially increase latency in production retrieval engines, such as Apache Solr, due to their lengthy posting lists. To address the issue of high DFs, we present a new variant of FLOPS regularization: DF-FLOPS. This new regularization technique penalizes the usage of high-DF terms, thereby shortening posting lists and reducing retrieval latency. Unlike other inference-time sparsification methods, such as stopword removal, DF-FLOPS regularization allows for the selective inclusion of high-frequency terms in cases where the terms are truly salient. We find that DF-FLOPS successfully reduces the prevalence of high-DF terms and lowers retrieval latency (around 10x faster) in a production-grade engine while maintaining effectiveness both in-domain (only a 2.2-point drop in MRR@10) and cross-domain (improved performance in 12 out of 13 tasks on which we tested). With retrieval latencies on par with BM25, this work provides an important step towards making LSR practical for deployment in production-grade search engines. Aldo Porco, Dhruv Mehra, Igor Malioutov, Karthik Radhakrishnan, Moniba Keymanesh, Daniel Preotiuc-Pietro, Sean MacAvaney, Pengxiang Cheng 0001 |
SIGIR | 8 |
| 2024 | Unsupervised Contrast-Consistent Ranking with Language ModelsabstractNiklas Stoehr, Pengxiang Cheng, Jing Wang, Daniel Preotiuc-Pietro, Rajarshi Bhowmik. Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024. Niklas Stoehr, Pengxiang Cheng 0001, Jing Wang 0069, Daniel Preotiuc-Pietro, Rajarshi Bhowmik |
EACL (1) | 2 |
| 2023 | Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Models
Xisen Jin, Xiang Ren 0001, Daniel Preotiuc-Pietro, Pengxiang Cheng 0001 |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2020 | Attending to Entities for Better Text UnderstandingabstractRecent progress in NLP witnessed the development of large-scale pre-trained language models (GPT, BERT, XLNet, etc.) based on Transformer (Vaswani et al. 2017), and in a range of end tasks, such models have achieved state-of-the-art results, approaching human performance. This clearly demonstrates the power of the stacked self-attention architecture when paired with a sufficient number of layers and a large amount of pre-training data. However, on tasks that require complex and long-distance reasoning where surface-level cues are not enough, there is still a large gap between the pre-trained models and human performance. Strubell et al. (2018) recently showed that it is possible to inject knowledge of syntactic structure into a model through supervised self-attention. We conjecture that a similar injection of semantic knowledge, in particular, coreference information, into an existing model would improve performance on such complex problems. On the LAMBADA (Paperno et al. 2016) task, we show that a model trained from scratch with coreference as auxiliary supervision for self-attention outperforms the largest GPT-2 model, setting the new state-of-the-art, while only containing a tiny fraction of parameters compared to GPT-2. We also conduct a thorough analysis of different variants of model architectures and supervision configurations, suggesting future directions on applying similar techniques to other problems. Pengxiang Cheng 0001, Katrin Erk |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2019 | Implicit Argument Prediction as Reading ComprehensionabstractImplicit arguments, which cannot be detected solely through syntactic cues, make it harder to extract predicate-argument tuples. We present a new model for implicit argument prediction that draws on reading comprehension, casting the predicate-argument tuple with the missing argument as a query. We also draw on pointer networks and multi-hop computation. Our model shows good performance on an argument cloze task as well as on a nominal implicit argument prediction task. Pengxiang Cheng 0001, Katrin Erk |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2018 | Implicit Argument Prediction with Event KnowledgeabstractPengxiang Cheng, Katrin Erk. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers). 2018. Pengxiang Cheng 0001, Katrin Erk |
NAACL-HLT | 1 |
| 2016 | Representing Meaning with a Combination of Logical and Distributional ModelsabstractNLP tasks differ in the semantic information they require, and at this time no single semantic representation fulfills all requirements. Logic-based representations characterize sentence structure, but do not capture the graded aspect of meaning. Distributional models give graded similarity ratings for words and phrases, but do not capture sentence structure in the same detail as logic-based approaches. It has therefore been argued that the two are complementary. We adopt a hybrid approach that combines logical and distributional semantics using probabilistic logic, specifically Markov Logic Networks. In this article, we focus on the three components of a practical system:11) Logical representation focuses on representing the input problems in probabilistic logic; 2) knowledge base construction creates weighted inference rules by integrating distributional information with other sources; and 3) probabilistic inference involves solving the resulting MLN inference problems efficiently. To evaluate our approach, we use the task of textual entailment, which can utilize the strengths of both logic-based and distributional representations. In particular we focus on the SICK data set, where we achieve state-of-the-art results. We also release a lexical entailment data set of 10,213 rules extracted from the SICK data set, which is a valuable resource for evaluating lexical entailment systems.2 Islam Beltagy, Stephen Roller, Pengxiang Cheng 0001, Katrin Erk, Raymond J. Mooney |
Comput. Linguistics | 3 |