Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ofri Ziv
dblp:163/3132
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Concurrent programming · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Concurrent programming
concurrency control |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Composing concurrency control · PLDI 2015 |
Concurrent programming › concurrency control
serializability |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Composing concurrency control · PLDI 2015 |
Concurrent programming
transactional memory |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Composing concurrency control · PLDI 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
two-phase locking · 0.2two-phase commit · 0.2software transactional memory · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Composing concurrency controlabstractConcurrency control poses significant challenges when composing computations over multiple data-structures (objects) with different concurrency-control implementations. We formalize the usually desired requirements (serializability, abort-safety, deadlock-safety, and opacity) as well as stronger versions of these properties that enable composition. We show how to compose protocols satisfying these properties so that the resulting combined protocol also satisfies these properties. Our approach generalizes well-known protocols (such as two-phase-locking and two-phase-commit) and leads to new protocols. We apply this theory to show how we can safely compose optimistic and pessimistic concurrency control. For example, we show how we can execute a transaction that accesses two objects, one controlled by an STM and another by locking. Ofri Ziv, Alex Aiken, Guy Golan-Gueta, G. Ramalingam, Shmuel Sagiv |
PLDI | 1 |