Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Matthias Hanreich

dblp:163/3566 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 67% Hardware security and side channels · 33%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security › return-oriented programming defense
code reuse attack defense
0.212015
HAFIX: hardware-assisted flow integrity extension · DAC 2015
Systems and software security › memory safety
control-flow integrity
0.212015
HAFIX: hardware-assisted flow integrity extension · DAC 2015
Hardware security and side channels
trusted execution environments
0.212015
HAFIX: hardware-assisted flow integrity extension · DAC 2015
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
instruction set architecture
0.112015
HAFIX: hardware-assisted flow integrity extension · DAC 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

return address protection · 0.4backward-edge CFI · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 HAFIX: hardware-assisted flow integrity extension
abstract
Code-reuse attacks like return-oriented programming (ROP) pose a severe threat to modern software on diverse processor architectures. Designing practical and secure defenses against code-reuse attacks is highly challenging and currently subject to intense research. However, no secure and practical system-level solutions exist so far, since a large number of proposed defenses have been successfully bypassed. To tackle this attack, we present HAFIX (Hardware-Assisted Flow Integrity eXtension), a defense against code-reuse attacks exploiting backward edges (returns). HAFIX provides fine-grained and practical protection, and serves as an enabling technology for future control-flow integrity instantiations. This paper presents the implementation and evaluation of HAFIX for the Intel® Siskiyou Peak and SPARC embedded system architectures, and demonstrates its security and efficiency in code-reuse protection while incurring only 2% performance overhead.
Lucas Davi, Matthias Hanreich, Debayan Paul, Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi, Patrick Koeberl, Dean Sullivan, Orlando Arias, Yier Jin
DAC2