Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tristan M. Carland

dblp:163/5941 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 50% Computational science and engineering · 50%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
High-performance computing · 50% Cloud and datacenter computing · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › omics data analysis
multi-omics analysis
0.212015
Omics Pipe: a community-based framework for reproducible multi-omics data analysis · Bioinform. 2015
Computational science and engineering › computational reproducibility
reproducible workflow
0.212015
Omics Pipe: a community-based framework for reproducible multi-omics data analysis · Bioinform. 2015
Cloud and datacenter computing › cloud applications
cloud-based bioinformatics
0.112015
Omics Pipe: a community-based framework for reproducible multi-omics data analysis · Bioinform. 2015
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems
0.112015
Omics Pipe: a community-based framework for reproducible multi-omics data analysis · Bioinform. 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

python · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Omics Pipe: a community-based framework for reproducible multi-omics data analysis
abstract
MOTIVATION: Omics Pipe (http://sulab.scripps.edu/omicspipe) is a computational framework that automates multi-omics data analysis pipelines on high performance compute clusters and in the cloud. It supports best practice published pipelines for RNA-seq, miRNA-seq, Exome-seq, Whole-Genome sequencing, ChIP-seq analyses and automatic processing of data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Omics Pipe provides researchers with a tool for reproducible, open source and extensible next generation sequencing analysis. The goal of Omics Pipe is to democratize next-generation sequencing analysis by dramatically increasing the accessibility and reproducibility of best practice computational pipelines, which will enable researchers to generate biologically meaningful and interpretable results. RESULTS: Using Omics Pipe, we analyzed 100 TCGA breast invasive carcinoma paired tumor-normal datasets based on the latest UCSC hg19 RefSeq annotation. Omics Pipe automatically downloaded and processed the desired TCGA samples on a high throughput compute cluster to produce a results report for each sample. We aggregated the individual sample results and compared them to the analysis in the original publications. This comparison revealed high overlap between the analyses, as well as novel findings due to the use of updated annotations and methods. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code for Omics Pipe is freely available on the web (https://bitbucket.org/sulab/omics_pipe). Omics Pipe is distributed as a standalone Python package for installation (https://pypi.python.org/pypi/omics_pipe) and as an Amazon Machine Image in Amazon Web Services Elastic Compute Cloud that contains all necessary third-party software dependencies and databases (https://pythonhosted.org/omics_pipe/AWS_installation.html).
Kathleen M. Fisch, Tobias Meißner, Louis Gioia, Jean-Christophe Ducom, Tristan M. Carland, Salvatore Loguercio, Andrew I. Su
Bioinform.5
2015 Group-based variant calling leveraging next-generation supercomputing for large-scale whole-genome sequencing studies
abstract
MOTIVATION: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have become much more efficient, allowing whole human genomes to be sequenced faster and cheaper than ever before. However, processing the raw sequence reads associated with NGS technologies requires care and sophistication in order to draw compelling inferences about phenotypic consequences of variation in human genomes. It has been shown that different approaches to variant calling from NGS data can lead to different conclusions. Ensuring appropriate accuracy and quality in variant calling can come at a computational cost. RESULTS: We describe our experience implementing and evaluating a group-based approach to calling variants on large numbers of whole human genomes. We explore the influence of many factors that may impact the accuracy and efficiency of group-based variant calling, including group size, the biogeographical backgrounds of the individuals who have been sequenced, and the computing environment used. We make efficient use of the Gordon supercomputer cluster at the San Diego Supercomputer Center by incorporating job-packing and parallelization considerations into our workflow while calling variants on 437 whole human genomes generated as part of large association study. CONCLUSIONS: We ultimately find that our workflow resulted in high-quality variant calls in a computationally efficient manner. We argue that studies like ours should motivate further investigations combining hardware-oriented advances in computing systems with algorithmic developments to tackle emerging 'big data' problems in biomedical research brought on by the expansion of NGS technologies.
Kristopher Standish, Tristan M. Carland, Glenn K. Lockwood, Wayne Pfeiffer, Mahidhar Tatineni, Sarah Lamberth, Yauheniya Cherkas, Carrie Brodmerkel, Ed Jaeger, Lance Smith, Gunaretnam Rajagopal, Mark Curran, Nicholas J. Schork
BMC Bioinform.2