Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Charles Christoffer

dblp:163/6080 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-6163-6323ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction › protein-protein docking
docking model quality assessment
0.412020
Protein docking model evaluation by 3D deep convolutional neural networks · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
protein complex structure prediction
0.412020
Protein docking model evaluation by 3D deep convolutional neural networks · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
protein-protein docking
0.412020
Protein docking model evaluation by 3D deep convolutional neural networks · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction
0.412020
Protein docking model evaluation by 3D deep convolutional neural networks · Bioinform. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

voxel-based representation · 0.43d convolutional neural network · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 SHREC 2022: Protein-ligand binding site recognition
Luca Gagliardi, Andrea Raffo, Ulderico Fugacci, Silvia Biasotti, Walter Rocchia, Hao Huang 0003, Boulbaba Ben Amor, Yi Fang 0006, Charles Christoffer, Daisuke Kihara, Apostolos Axenopoulos, Stelios K. Mylonas, Petros Daras
Comput. Graph.11
2021 SHREC 2021: Retrieval and classification of protein surfaces equipped with physical and chemical properties
Andrea Raffo, Ulderico Fugacci, Silvia Biasotti, Walter Rocchia, Yonghuai Liu, Ekpo Otu, Reyer Zwiggelaar, David Hunter, Evangelia I. Zacharaki, Eleftheria Psatha, Dimitrios Laskos, Gerasimos Arvanitis, Konstantinos Moustakas, Tunde Aderinwale, Charles Christoffer, Woong-Hee Shin, Daisuke Kihara, Andrea Giachetti 0001, Huu-Nghia Nguyen, Tuan-Duy Nguyen, Vinh-Thuyen Nguyen-Truong, Danh Le-Thanh, Hai-Dang Nguyen, Minh-Triet Tran
Comput. Graph.15
2020 Protein docking model evaluation by 3D deep convolutional neural networks
abstract
MOTIVATION: Many important cellular processes involve physical interactions of proteins. Therefore, determining protein quaternary structures provide critical insights for understanding molecular mechanisms of functions of the complexes. To complement experimental methods, many computational methods have been developed to predict structures of protein complexes. One of the challenges in computational protein complex structure prediction is to identify near-native models from a large pool of generated models. RESULTS: We developed a convolutional deep neural network-based approach named DOcking decoy selection with Voxel-based deep neural nEtwork (DOVE) for evaluating protein docking models. To evaluate a protein docking model, DOVE scans the protein-protein interface of the model with a 3D voxel and considers atomic interaction types and their energetic contributions as input features applied to the neural network. The deep learning models were trained and validated on docking models available in the ZDock and DockGround databases. Among the different combinations of features tested, almost all outperformed existing scoring functions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Codes available at http://github.com/kiharalab/DOVE, http://kiharalab.org/dove/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Xiao Wang 0013, Genki Terashi, Charles Christoffer, Daisuke Kihara
Bioinform.3
2020 SHREC 2020: Multi-domain protein shape retrieval challenge
Florent Langenfeld, Yuxu Peng, Yukun Lai, Paul L. Rosin, Tunde Aderinwale, Genki Terashi, Charles Christoffer, Daisuke Kihara, Halim Benhabiles, Karim Hammoudi, Adnane Cabani, Féryal Windal, Mahmoud Melkemi, Andrea Giachetti 0001, Stelios K. Mylonas, Apostolos Axenopoulos, Petros Daras, Ekpo Otu, Matthieu Montès
Comput. Graph.7
2019 A global map of the protein shape universe
abstract
Proteins are involved in almost all functions in a living cell, and functions of proteins are realized by their tertiary structures. Obtaining a global perspective of the variety and distribution of protein structures lays a foundation for our understanding of the building principle of protein structures. In light of the rapid accumulation of low-resolution structure data from electron tomography and cryo-electron microscopy, here we map and classify three-dimensional (3D) surface shapes of proteins into a similarity space. Surface shapes of proteins were represented with 3D Zernike descriptors, mathematical moment-based invariants, which have previously been demonstrated effective for biomolecular structure similarity search. In addition to single chains of proteins, we have also analyzed the shape space occupied by protein complexes. From the mapping, we have obtained various new insights into the relationship between shapes, main-chain folds, and complex formation. The unique view obtained from shape mapping opens up new ways to understand design principles, functions, and evolution of proteins.
Xusi Han, Atilla Sit, Charles Christoffer, Daisuke Kihara
PLoS Comput. Biol.3
2018 Modeling the assembly order of multimeric heteroprotein complexes
abstract
Protein-protein interactions are the cornerstone of numerous biological processes. Although an increasing number of protein complex structures have been determined using experimental methods, relatively fewer studies have been performed to determine the assembly order of complexes. In addition to the insights into the molecular mechanisms of biological function provided by the structure of a complex, knowing the assembly order is important for understanding the process of complex formation. Assembly order is also practically useful for constructing subcomplexes as a step toward solving the entire complex experimentally, designing artificial protein complexes, and developing drugs that interrupt a critical step in the complex assembly. There are several experimental methods for determining the assembly order of complexes; however, these techniques are resource-intensive. Here, we present a computational method that predicts the assembly order of protein complexes by building the complex structure. The method, named Path-LzerD, uses a multimeric protein docking algorithm that assembles a protein complex structure from individual subunit structures and predicts assembly order by observing the simulated assembly process of the complex. Benchmarked on a dataset of complexes with experimental evidence of assembly order, Path-LZerD was successful in predicting the assembly pathway for the majority of the cases. Moreover, when compared with a simple approach that infers the assembly path from the buried surface area of subunits in the native complex, Path-LZerD has the strong advantage that it can be used for cases where the complex structure is not known. The path prediction accuracy decreased when starting from unbound monomers, particularly for larger complexes of five or more subunits, for which only a part of the assembly path was correctly identified. As the first method of its kind, Path-LZerD opens a new area of computational protein structure modeling and will be an indispensable approach for studying protein complexes.
Lenna X. Peterson, Yoichiro Togawa, Juan Esquivel-Rodríguez, Genki Terashi, Charles Christoffer, Amitava Roy, Woong-Hee Shin, Daisuke Kihara
PLoS Comput. Biol.5
2017 Modeling disordered protein interactions from biophysical principles
abstract
Disordered protein-protein interactions (PPIs), those involving a folded protein and an intrinsically disordered protein (IDP), are prevalent in the cell, including important signaling and regulatory pathways. IDPs do not adopt a single dominant structure in isolation but often become ordered upon binding. To aid understanding of the molecular mechanisms of disordered PPIs, it is crucial to obtain the tertiary structure of the PPIs. However, experimental methods have difficulty in solving disordered PPIs and existing protein-protein and protein-peptide docking methods are not able to model them. Here we present a novel computational method, IDP-LZerD, which models the conformation of a disordered PPI by considering the biophysical binding mechanism of an IDP to a structured protein, whereby a local segment of the IDP initiates the interaction and subsequently the remaining IDP regions explore and coalesce around the initial binding site. On a dataset of 22 disordered PPIs with IDPs up to 69 amino acids, successful predictions were made for 21 bound and 18 unbound receptors. The successful modeling provides additional support for biophysical principles. Moreover, the new technique significantly expands the capability of protein structure modeling and provides crucial insights into the molecular mechanisms of disordered PPIs.
Lenna X. Peterson, Amitava Roy, Charles Christoffer, Genki Terashi, Daisuke Kihara
PLoS Comput. Biol.3
2015 Navigating 3D electron microscopy maps with EM-SURFER
abstract
BACKGROUND: The Electron Microscopy DataBank (EMDB) is growing rapidly, accumulating biological structural data obtained mainly by electron microscopy and tomography, which are emerging techniques for determining large biomolecular complex and subcellular structures. Together with the Protein Data Bank (PDB), EMDB is becoming a fundamental resource of the tertiary structures of biological macromolecules. To take full advantage of this indispensable resource, the ability to search the database by structural similarity is essential. However, unlike high-resolution structures stored in PDB, methods for comparing low-resolution electron microscopy (EM) density maps in EMDB are not well established. RESULTS: We developed a computational method for efficiently searching low-resolution EM maps. The method uses a compact fingerprint representation of EM maps based on the 3D Zernike descriptor, which is derived from a mathematical series expansion for EM maps that are considered as 3D functions. The method is implemented in a web server named EM-SURFER, which allows users to search against the entire EMDB in real-time. EM-SURFER compares the global shapes of EM maps. Examples of search results from different types of query structures are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: We developed EM-SURFER, which retrieves structurally relevant matches for query EM maps from EMDB within seconds. The unique capability of EM-SURFER to detect 3D shape similarity of low-resolution EM maps should prove invaluable in structural biology.
Juan Esquivel-Rodríguez, Yi Xiong 0002, Xusi Han, Shuomeng Guang, Charles Christoffer, Daisuke Kihara
BMC Bioinform.5