Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nicholas J. Cavanna
dblp:163/7138
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Computational geometry · 100% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | When and Why the Topological Coverage Criterion Works · SODA 2017 |
Computational geometry
computational topology |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | When and Why the Topological Coverage Criterion Works · SODA 2017 |
Computational geometry
topological data analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Visualizing Sparse Filtrations · SoCG 2015 |
Computational geometry
visualization |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Visualizing Sparse Filtrations · SoCG 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
homology · 0.6simplicial complexes · 0.3simplicial complex · 0.3persistent homology approximation · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | When and Why the Topological Coverage Criterion WorksabstractIn their seminal work on homological sensor networks, de Silva and Ghrist showed the surprising fact that it's possible to certify the coverage of a coordinate-free sensor network even with very minimal knowledge of the space to be covered. Here, coverage means that every point in the domain (except possibly those very near the boundary) has a nearby sensor. More generally, their algorithm takes a pair of nested neighborhood graphs along with a labeling of vertices as either boundary or interior and computes the relative homology of a simplicial complex induced by the graphs. This approach, called the Topological Coverage Criterion (TCC), requires some assumptions about the underlying geometric domain as well as some assumptions about the relationship of the input graphs to the domain. The goal of this paper is to generalize these assumptions and show how the TCC can be applied to both much more general domains as well as very weak assumptions on the input. We give a new, simpler proof of the de Silva-Ghrist Topological Coverage Criterion that eliminates any assumptions about the smoothness of the boundary of the underlying space, allowing the results to be applied to much more general problems. The new proof factors the geometric, topological, and combinatorial aspects, allowing us to provide a coverage condition that supports thick boundaries, k-coverage, and weighted coverage, in which sensors have varying radii. Nicholas J. Cavanna, Kirk P. Gardner, Don Sheehy |
SODA | 1 |
| 2015 | Visualizing Sparse FiltrationsabstractOver the last few years, there have been several approaches to building sparser complexes that still give good approximations to the persistent homology. In this video, we have illustrated a geometric perspective on sparse filtrations that leads to simpler proofs, more general theorems, and a more visual explanation. We hope that as these techniques become easier to understand, they will also become easier to use. Nicholas J. Cavanna, Mahmoodreza Jahanseir, Don Sheehy |
SoCG | 1 |