Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nicholas J. Cavanna

dblp:163/7138 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Computational geometry · 100%
Computer networks
1 paper
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network
0.312017
When and Why the Topological Coverage Criterion Works · SODA 2017
Computational geometry
computational topology
0.312017
When and Why the Topological Coverage Criterion Works · SODA 2017
Computational geometry
topological data analysis
0.212015
Visualizing Sparse Filtrations · SoCG 2015
Computational geometry
visualization
0.212015
Visualizing Sparse Filtrations · SoCG 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

homology · 0.6simplicial complexes · 0.3simplicial complex · 0.3persistent homology approximation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 When and Why the Topological Coverage Criterion Works
abstract
In their seminal work on homological sensor networks, de Silva and Ghrist showed the surprising fact that it's possible to certify the coverage of a coordinate-free sensor network even with very minimal knowledge of the space to be covered. Here, coverage means that every point in the domain (except possibly those very near the boundary) has a nearby sensor. More generally, their algorithm takes a pair of nested neighborhood graphs along with a labeling of vertices as either boundary or interior and computes the relative homology of a simplicial complex induced by the graphs. This approach, called the Topological Coverage Criterion (TCC), requires some assumptions about the underlying geometric domain as well as some assumptions about the relationship of the input graphs to the domain. The goal of this paper is to generalize these assumptions and show how the TCC can be applied to both much more general domains as well as very weak assumptions on the input. We give a new, simpler proof of the de Silva-Ghrist Topological Coverage Criterion that eliminates any assumptions about the smoothness of the boundary of the underlying space, allowing the results to be applied to much more general problems. The new proof factors the geometric, topological, and combinatorial aspects, allowing us to provide a coverage condition that supports thick boundaries, k-coverage, and weighted coverage, in which sensors have varying radii.
Nicholas J. Cavanna, Kirk P. Gardner, Don Sheehy
SODA1
2015 Visualizing Sparse Filtrations
abstract
Over the last few years, there have been several approaches to building sparser complexes that still give good approximations to the persistent homology. In this video, we have illustrated a geometric perspective on sparse filtrations that leads to simpler proofs, more general theorems, and a more visual explanation. We hope that as these techniques become easier to understand, they will also become easier to use.
Nicholas J. Cavanna, Mahmoodreza Jahanseir, Don Sheehy
SoCG1