Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Donald W. Boettner

dblp:164/0310 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1969
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models		 0.011969
Measurement and performance of a multiprogramming system · SOSP 1969
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization		 0.011969
Measurement and performance of a multiprogramming system · SOSP 1969
Operating systems › resource management › process management
multiprogramming		 0.011969
Measurement and performance of a multiprogramming system · SOSP 1969
Operating systems › resource management › process management › multiprogramming
time-sharing systems		 0.011969
Measurement and performance of a multiprogramming system · SOSP 1969
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1969 Measurement and performance of a multiprogramming system
abstract
This paper presents a brief description of a general multiprogramming (and time-sharing) system in operation at the University of Michigan. A number of time and space distributions obtained from a typical month of operation are presented. The performance is summarized by a load diagram. Efficiency as a comparison with ideal performance is discussed and a model suitable for idealization is proposed.
Bruce W. Arden, Donald W. Boettner
 SOSP2