Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Veepin Kumar

dblp:164/0696 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0001-9982-7937ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing › image restoration › image inpainting
exemplar-based inpainting
0.212016
Image Inpainting Through Metric Labeling via Guided Patch Mixing · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2016
Image and video processing › image restoration
image inpainting
0.212016
Image Inpainting Through Metric Labeling via Guided Patch Mixing · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulated annealing · 0.2patch mixing · 0.2metric labeling · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Image Inpainting Through Metric Labeling via Guided Patch Mixing
abstract
In this paper, we present a novel formulation of exemplar-based image inpainting as a metric labeling problem, and solve it through the simulated annealing algorithm. Due to their greedy nature, exemplar-based methods sometimes produce inpainted images, which are visually inconsistent. These methods are highly dependent upon the initialization. To solve these problems, we generate five images with a different initialization. A suitable mixture of these five images produces a good inpainted image. The cost function of the proposed metric labeling problem consists of three components, namely, neighbor cost, total variation cost, and structure cost. A linear combination among these components is used to maintain better visual consistency in the inpainted region having smooth transition from the bordering regions of the source image. We use a quality measure to this end. Our experiments on a wide variety of images demonstrate that the proposed technique produces better inpainting images as compared with some other state-of-the-art techniques.
Veepin Kumar, Jayanta Mukhopadhyay, Shyamal Kumar Das Mandal
IEEE Trans. Image Process.1
2015 Combinatorial Exemplar-Based Image Inpainting
Veepin Kumar, Jayanta Mukhopadhyay, Shyamal Kumar Das Mandal
IWCIA1