Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jonathan B. A. Millar
dblp:164/0948
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0000-0002-9930-3989ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology › network inference › gene regulatory network inference
bayesian network inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Inferring orthologous gene regulatory networks using interspecies data fusion · Bioinform. 2015 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology › network inference
gene regulatory network inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Inferring orthologous gene regulatory networks using interspecies data fusion · Bioinform. 2015 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
time-series gene expression analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Inferring orthologous gene regulatory networks using interspecies data fusion · Bioinform. 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graph kernel · 0.2gaussian process · 0.2bayesian hierarchical model · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Inferring orthologous gene regulatory networks using interspecies data fusionabstractMOTIVATION: The ability to jointly learn gene regulatory networks (GRNs) in, or leverage GRNs between related species would allow the vast amount of legacy data obtained in model organisms to inform the GRNs of more complex, or economically or medically relevant counterparts. Examples include transferring information from Arabidopsis thaliana into related crop species for food security purposes, or from mice into humans for medical applications. Here we develop two related Bayesian approaches to network inference that allow GRNs to be jointly inferred in, or leveraged between, several related species: in one framework, network information is directly propagated between species; in the second hierarchical approach, network information is propagated via an unobserved 'hypernetwork'. In both frameworks, information about network similarity is captured via graph kernels, with the networks additionally informed by species-specific time series gene expression data, when available, using Gaussian processes to model the dynamics of gene expression. RESULTS: Results on in silico benchmarks demonstrate that joint inference, and leveraging of known networks between species, offers better accuracy than standalone inference. The direct propagation of network information via the non-hierarchical framework is more appropriate when there are relatively few species, while the hierarchical approach is better suited when there are many species. Both methods are robust to small amounts of mislabelling of orthologues. Finally, the use of Saccharomyces cerevisiae data and networks to inform inference of networks in the budding yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe predicts a novel role in cell cycle regulation for Gas1 (SPAC19B12.02c), a 1,3-beta-glucanosyltransferase. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: MATLAB code is available from http://go.warwick.ac.uk/systemsbiology/software/. Christopher A. Penfold, Jonathan B. A. Millar, David L. Wild |
Bioinform. | 2 |