EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Robin Hutmacher
dblp:164/3465
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 68% Image recognition and object detection · 19% Generative modeling · 7% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Identification of Systematic Errors of Image Classifiers on Rare Subgroups · ICCV 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Identification of Systematic Errors of Image Classifiers on Rare Subgroups · ICCV 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
robustness to corruption |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Does enhanced shape bias improve neural network robustness to common corruptions? · ICLR 2021 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
shape bias |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Does enhanced shape bias improve neural network robustness to common corruptions? · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Identification of Systematic Errors of Image Classifiers on Rare Subgroups · ICCV 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Does enhanced shape bias improve neural network robustness to common corruptions? · ICLR 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
text-to-image synthesis · 0.7prompt search · 0.7combinatorial testing · 0.7shape bias analysis · 0.5data augmentation · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Identification of Systematic Errors of Image Classifiers on Rare SubgroupsabstractDespite excellent average-case performance of many image classifiers, their performance can substantially deteriorate on semantically coherent subgroups of the data that were under-represented in the training data. These systematic errors can impact both fairness for demographic minority groups as well as robustness and safety under domain shift. A major challenge is to identify such subgroups with subpar performance when the subgroups are not annotated and their occurrence is very rare. We leverage recent advances in text-to-image models and search in the space of textual descriptions of subgroups ("prompts") for sub-groups where the target model has low performance on the prompt-conditioned synthesized data. To tackle the exponentially growing number of subgroups, we employ combinatorial testing. We denote this procedure as PromptAttack as it can be interpreted as an adversarial attack in a prompt space. We study subgroup coverage and identifiability with PromptAttack in a controlled setting and find that it identifies systematic errors with high accuracy. Thereupon, we apply PromptAttack to ImageNet classifiers and identify novel systematic errors on rare subgroups. Jan Hendrik Metzen, Robin Hutmacher, N. Grace Hua, Valentyn Boreiko |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2021 | Does enhanced shape bias improve neural network robustness to common corruptions?
Chaithanya Kumar Mummadi, Ranjitha Subramaniam, Robin Hutmacher, Julien Vitay, Volker Fischer 0003, Jan Hendrik Metzen |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2016 | Scene recognition for mobile robots by relational object search using Next-Best-View estimates from hierarchical Implicit Shape ModelsabstractWe present an approach for recognizing indoor scenes in object constellations that require object search by a mobile robot, as they cannot be captured from a single viewpoint. In our approach that we call Active Scene Recognition (ASR), robots predict object poses from learnt spatial relations that they combine with their estimates about present scenes. Our models for estimating scenes and predicting poses are Implicit Shape Model (ISM) trees from prior work [1]. ISMs model scenes as sets of objects with spatial relations in-between and are learnt from observations. In prior work [2], we presented a realization of ASR, limited to choosing orientations for a fixed robot head with an approach to search objects that uses positions and ignores types. In this paper, we introduce an integrated system that extends ASR to selecting positions and orientations of camera views for a mobile robot with a pivoting head. We contribute an approach for Next-Best-View estimation in object search on predicted object poses. It is defined on 6 DoF viewing frustums and optimizes the searched view, together with the objects to be searched in it, based on 6 DoF pose predictions. To prevent combinatorial explosion when searching camera pose space, we introduce a hierarchical approach to sample robot positions with increasing resolution. Pascal Meissner, Ralf Schleicher, Robin Hutmacher, Sven R. Schmidt-Rohr, Rüdiger Dillmann |
IROS | 3 |