Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dmitrii Marin
dblp:164/5695
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
6as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-4799-3412ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 5 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 10 · 5 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 49% 3D vision · 33% Reinforcement learning · 7% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 93% Mathematical optimization · 7% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers |
Image and video processing · 71% Computational photography and imaging · 29% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 22 heaviest of 27, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
1.3 | 3 | 2021 | Robust Trust Region for Weakly Supervised Segmentation · ICCV 2021 Efficient Segmentation: Learning Downsampling Near Semantic Boundaries · ICCV 2019 Beyond Gradient Descent for Regularized Segmentation Losses · CVPR 2019 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › semantic segmentation
weakly supervised semantic segmentation |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Robust Trust Region for Weakly Supervised Segmentation · ICCV 2021 Beyond Gradient Descent for Regularized Segmentation Losses · CVPR 2019 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
object pose estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Co-Evaluation of Cameras, HDR, and Algorithms for Industrial-Grade 6DoF Pose Estimation · CVPR 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
pose estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Co-Evaluation of Cameras, HDR, and Algorithms for Industrial-Grade 6DoF Pose Estimation · CVPR 2024 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.8 | 2 | 2019 | Kernel Clustering: Density Biases and Solutions · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019 Kernel Cuts: Kernel and Spectral Clustering Meet Regularization · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
trust region methods |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Robust Trust Region for Weakly Supervised Segmentation · ICCV 2021 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation |
0.5 | 2 | 2016 | Normalized Cut Meets MRF · ECCV (2) 2016 Secrets of GrabCut and Kernel K-Means · ICCV 2015 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation
efficient segmentation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Efficient Segmentation: Learning Downsampling Near Semantic Boundaries · ICCV 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
loss function |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Beyond Gradient Descent for Regularized Segmentation Losses · CVPR 2019 |
Data mining › clustering
kernel clustering |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Kernel Clustering: Density Biases and Solutions · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019 |
Data mining › clustering
spectral clustering |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Kernel Cuts: Kernel and Spectral Clustering Meet Regularization · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2019 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph cut |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Kernel Cuts: Kernel and Spectral Clustering Meet Regularization · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2019 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
vascular imaging |
0.3 | 2 | 2021 | Confluent Vessel Trees With Accurate Bifurcations · CVPR 2021 Divergence Prior and Vessel-Tree Reconstruction · CVPR 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
markov random field |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Normalized Cut Meets MRF · ECCV (2) 2016 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation › graph-based segmentation
normalized cuts |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Normalized Cut Meets MRF · ECCV (2) 2016 |
Computational photography and imaging
high dynamic range imaging |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Co-Evaluation of Cameras, HDR, and Algorithms for Industrial-Grade 6DoF Pose Estimation · CVPR 2024 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
interactive segmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Secrets of GrabCut and Kernel K-Means · ICCV 2015 |
Image and video processing › image segmentation
contour detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Thin Structure Estimation with Curvature Regularization · ICCV 2015 |
Image and video processing › image restoration › inverse problem › inverse problem regularization › image regularization
curvature regularization |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Thin Structure Estimation with Curvature Regularization · ICCV 2015 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
clustering theory |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Kernel Clustering: Density Biases and Solutions · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019 |
Medical and health informatics › biomedical modeling
blood flow simulation |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Divergence Prior and Vessel-Tree Reconstruction · CVPR 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › energy minimization
graph cuts |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Secrets of GrabCut and Kernel K-Means · ICCV 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
structured light · 1.5polarization imaging · 1.5minimum arborescence · 1.5flow-extrapolating arc construction · 1.5confluence constraint · 1.5kernel methods · 1.1curvature regularization · 0.8regularization · 0.8trust region · 0.5low-level solvers · 0.5chain rule generalization · 0.5graph cuts · 0.5lower bound optimization · 0.4joint optimization · 0.4unsupervised reconstruction · 0.4locally adaptive kernels · 0.4learned downsampling · 0.4divergence prior · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Towards Co-Evaluation of Cameras, HDR, and Algorithms for Industrial-Grade 6DoF Pose Estimationabstract6DoF Pose estimation has been gaining increased importance in vision for over a decade, however it does not yet meet the reliability and accuracy standards for mass deployment in industrial robotics. To this effect, we present the Industrial Plenoptic Dataset (IPD): the first dataset for the co-evaluation of cameras, HDR, and algorithms targeted at reliable, high-accuracy industrial automation. Specifically, we capture 2,300 physical scenes of 20 industrial parts covering a 1m × 1m × 0.5m working volume, resulting in over 100,000 distinct object views. Each scene is captured with 13 well-calibrated multi-modal cameras including polarization and high-resolution structured light. In terms of lighting, we capture each scene at 4 exposures and in 3 challenging lighting conditions ranging from 100 lux to 100,000 lux. We also present, validate, and analyze robot consistency, an evaluation method targeted at scalable, high accuracy evaluation. We hope that vision systems that succeed on this dataset will have direct industry impact. The dataset and evaluation code are available at https://github.com/intrinsic-ai/ipd. Agastya Kalra, Guy Stoppi, Dmitrii Marin, Vage Taamazyan, Aarrushi Shandilya, Rishav Agarwal, Anton Boykov, Tze Hao Chong, Michael Stark 0003 |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2023 | Token Pooling in Vision Transformers for Image ClassificationabstractPooling is commonly used to improve the computation-accuracy trade-off of convolutional networks. By aggregating neighboring feature values on the image grid, pooling layers downsample feature maps while maintaining accuracy. In standard vision transformers, however, tokens are processed individually and do not necessarily lie on regular grids. Utilizing pooling methods designed for image grids (e.g., average pooling) thus can be sub-optimal for transformers, as shown by our experiments. In this paper, we propose Token Pooling to downsample token sets in vision transformers. We take a new perspective — instead of assuming tokens form a regular grid, we treat them as discrete (and irregular) samples of an implicit continuous signal. Given a target number of tokens, Token Pooling finds the set of tokens that best approximates the underlying continuous signal. We rigorously evaluate the proposed method on the standard transformer architecture (ViT/DeiT) and on the image classification problem using ImageNet-1k. Our experiments show that Token Pooling significantly improves the computation-accuracy trade-off without any further modifications to the architecture. Token Pooling enables DeiT-Ti to achieve the same top-1 accuracy while using 42% fewer computations. Dmitrii Marin, Jen-Hao Rick Chang, Anurag Ranjan, Anish Prabhu, Mohammad Rastegari, Oncel Tuzel |
WACV | 1 |
| 2021 | Confluent Vessel Trees With Accurate BifurcationsabstractWe are interested in unsupervised reconstruction of complex near-capillary vasculature with thousands of bifurcations where supervision and learning are infeasible. Unsupervised methods can use many structural constraints, e.g. topology, geometry, physics. Common techniques use variants of MST on geodesic tubular graphs minimizing symmetric pairwise costs, i.e. distances. We show limitations of such standard undirected tubular graphs producing typical errors at bifurcations where flow "directedness" is critical. We introduce a new general concept of confluence for continuous oriented curves forming vessel trees and show how to enforce it on discrete tubular graphs. While confluence is a high-order property, we present an efficient practical algorithm for reconstructing confluent vessel trees using minimum arborescence on a directed graph enforcing confluence via simple flow-extrapolating arc construction. Empirical tests on large near-capillary sub-voxel vasculature volumes demonstrate significantly improved reconstruction accuracy at bifurcations. Our code has also been made publicly available1. Zhongwen Zhang, Dmitrii Marin, Maria Drangova, Yuri Boykov |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2021 | Robust Trust Region for Weakly Supervised SegmentationabstractAcquisition of training data for the standard semantic segmentation is expensive if requiring that each pixel is labeled. Yet, current methods significantly deteriorate in weakly supervised settings, e.g. where a fraction of pixels is labeled or when only image-level tags are available. It has been shown that regularized losses—originally developed for unsupervised low-level segmentation and representing geometric priors on pixel labels—can considerably improve the quality of weakly supervised training. However, many common priors require optimization stronger than gradient descent. Thus, such regularizers have limited applicability in deep learning. We propose a new robust trust region approach1for regularized losses improving the state-of-the-art results. Our approach can be seen as a higher-order generalization of the classic chain rule. It allows neural network optimization to use strong low-level solvers for the corresponding regularizers, including discrete ones. Dmitrii Marin, Yuri Boykov |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2019 | Beyond Gradient Descent for Regularized Segmentation LossesabstractThe simplicity of gradient descent (GD) made it the default method for training ever-deeper and complex neural networks. Both loss functions and architectures are often explicitly tuned to be amenable to this basic local optimization. In the context of weakly-supervised CNN segmentation, we demonstrate a well-motivated loss function where an alternative optimizer (ADM) achieves the state-of-the-art while GD performs poorly. Interestingly, GD obtains its best result for a "smoother" tuning of the loss function. The results are consistent across different network architectures. Our loss is motivated by well-understood MRF/CRF regularization models in "shallow" segmentation and their known global solvers. Our work suggests that network design/training should pay more attention to optimization methods. Dmitrii Marin, Meng Tang 0001, Ismail Ben Ayed, Yuri Boykov |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2019 | Divergence Prior and Vessel-Tree ReconstructionabstractWe propose a new geometric regularization principle for reconstructing vector fields based on prior knowledge about their divergence. As one important example of this general idea, we focus on vector fields modelling blood flow pattern that should be divergent in arteries and convergent in veins. We show that this previously ignored regularization constraint can significantly improve the quality of vessel tree reconstruction particularly around bifurcations where non-zero divergence is concentrated. Our divergence prior is critical for resolving (binary) sign ambiguity in flow orientations produced by standard vessel filters, \eg Frangi. Our vessel tree centerline reconstruction combines divergence constraints with robust curvature regularization. Our unsupervised method can reconstruct complete vessel trees with near-capillary details on synthetic and real 3D volumes. Zhongwen Zhang, Dmitrii Marin, Egor Chesakov, Marc Moreno Maza, Maria Drangova, Yuri Boykov |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2019 | Efficient Segmentation: Learning Downsampling Near Semantic BoundariesabstractMany automated processes such as auto-piloting rely on a good semantic segmentation as a critical component. To speed up performance, it is common to downsample the input frame. However, this comes at the cost of missed small objects and reduced accuracy at semantic boundaries. To address this problem, we propose a new content-adaptive downsampling technique that learns to favor sampling locations near semantic boundaries of target classes. Cost-performance analysis shows that our method consistently outperforms the uniform sampling improving balance between accuracy and computational efficiency. Our adaptive sampling gives segmentation with better quality of boundaries and more reliable support for smaller-size objects. Dmitrii Marin, Peter Vajda, Priyam Chatterjee, Sam S. Tsai, Yuri Boykov |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2019 | Kernel Cuts: Kernel and Spectral Clustering Meet Regularization
Meng Tang 0001, Dmitrii Marin, Ismail Ben Ayed, Yuri Boykov |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 2 |
| 2019 | Kernel Clustering: Density Biases and SolutionsabstractKernel methods are popular in clustering due to their generality and discriminating power. However, we show that many kernel clustering criteria have density biases theoretically explaining some practically significant artifacts empirically observed in the past. For example, we provide conditions and formally prove the density mode isolation bias in kernel K-means for a common class of kernels. We call it Breiman's bias due to its similarity to the histogram mode isolation previously discovered by Breiman in decision tree learning with Gini impurity. We also extend our analysis to other popular kernel clustering methods, e.g., average/normalized cut or dominant sets, where density biases can take different forms. For example, splitting isolated points by cut-based criteria is essentially the sparsest subset bias, which is the opposite of the density mode bias. Our findings suggest that a principled solution for density biases in kernel clustering should directly address data inhomogeneity. We show that density equalization can be implicitly achieved using either locally adaptive weights or locally adaptive kernels. Moreover, density equalization makes many popular kernel clustering objectives equivalent. Our synthetic and real data experiments illustrate density biases and proposed solutions. We anticipate that theoretical understanding of kernel clustering limitations and their principled solutions will be important for a broad spectrum of data analysis applications across the disciplines. Dmitrii Marin, Meng Tang 0001, Ismail Ben Ayed, Yuri Boykov |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2016 | Normalized Cut Meets MRF
Meng Tang 0001, Dmitrii Marin, Ismail Ben Ayed, Yuri Boykov |
ECCV (2) | 2 |
| 2015 | Thin Structure Estimation with Curvature RegularizationabstractMany applications in vision require estimation of thin structures such as boundary edges, surfaces, roads, blood vessels, neurons, etc. Unlike most previous approaches, we simultaneously detect and delineate thin structures with sub-pixel localization and real-valued orientation estimation. This is an ill-posed problem that requires regularization. We propose an objective function combining detection likelihoods with a prior minimizing curvature of the center-lines or surfaces. Unlike simple block-coordinate descent, we develop a novel algorithm that is able to perform joint optimization of location and detection variables more effectively. Our lower bound optimization algorithm applies to quadratic or absolute curvature. The proposed early vision framework is sufficiently general and it can be used in many higher-level applications. We illustrate the advantage of our approach on a range of 2D and 3D examples. Dmitrii Marin, Yuchen Zhong, Maria Drangova, Yuri Boykov |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2015 | Secrets of GrabCut and Kernel K-MeansabstractThe log-likelihood energy term in popular model-fitting segmentation methods, e.g. [39, 8, 28, 10], is presented as a generalized "probabilistic K-means" energy [16] for color space clustering. This interpretation reveals some limitations, e.g. over-fitting. We propose an alternative approach to color clustering using kernel K-means energy with well-known properties such as non-linear separation and scalability to higher-dimensional feature spaces. Our bound formulation for kernel K-means allows to combine general pair-wise feature clustering methods with image grid regularization using graph cuts, similarly to standard color model fitting techniques for segmentation. Unlike histogram or GMM fitting [39, 28], our approach is closely related to average association and normalized cut. But, in contrast to previous pairwise clustering algorithms, our approach can incorporate any standard geometric regularization in the image domain. We analyze extreme cases for kernel bandwidth (e.g. Gini bias) and demonstrate effectiveness of KNN-based adaptive bandwidth strategies. Our kernel K-means approach to segmentation benefits from higher-dimensional features where standard model fitting fails. Meng Tang 0001, Ismail Ben Ayed, Dmitrii Marin, Yuri Boykov |
ICCV | 3 |