Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eugène Ndiaye

dblp:164/5959 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
7as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-4898-434XORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 12 · 7 first-author · 7 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
11 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 35% Trustworthy machine learning · 32% Generative modeling · 15%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 22 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
conformal prediction
2.442024
Conformal Prediction via Regression-as-Classification · ICLR 2024
Conformalization of Sparse Generalized Linear Models · ICML 2023
Stable Conformal Prediction Sets · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
2.032024
Conformal Prediction via Regression-as-Classification · ICLR 2024
Conformalization of Sparse Generalized Linear Models · ICML 2023
Stable Conformal Prediction Sets · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
Shielded Diffusion: Generating Novel and Diverse Images using Sparse Repellency · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
memorization in generative models
0.912025
Shielded Diffusion: Generating Novel and Diverse Images using Sparse Repellency · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › text-to-image generation
text-to-image diffusion model
0.912025
Shielded Diffusion: Generating Novel and Diverse Images using Sparse Repellency · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
bilevel optimization
0.812024
Careful with that Scalpel: Improving Gradient Surgery with an EMA · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching
0.812024
Learning Elastic Costs to Shape Monge Displacements · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training optimization
gradient surgery
0.812024
Careful with that Scalpel: Improving Gradient Surgery with an EMA · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimal transport
monge map
0.812024
Learning Elastic Costs to Shape Monge Displacements · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
multi-objective optimization
0.812024
Careful with that Scalpel: Improving Gradient Surgery with an EMA · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
optimal transport
0.812024
Learning Elastic Costs to Shape Monge Displacements · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
regression
0.812024
Conformal Prediction via Regression-as-Classification · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
safe screening
0.832017
Gap Safe Screening Rules for Sparsity Enforcing Penalties · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
GAP Safe Screening Rules for Sparse-Group Lasso · NIPS 2016
GAP Safe screening rules for sparse multi-task and multi-class models · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
solution path algorithm
0.712023
Conformalization of Sparse Generalized Linear Models · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
algorithmic stability
0.612022
Stable Conformal Prediction Sets · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
coordinate descent
0.522016
GAP Safe Screening Rules for Sparse-Group Lasso · NIPS 2016
GAP Safe screening rules for sparse multi-task and multi-class models · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
sparse regularization
0.522016
GAP Safe Screening Rules for Sparse-Group Lasso · NIPS 2016
GAP Safe screening rules for sparse multi-task and multi-class models · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
homotopy methods
0.412019
Computing Full Conformal Prediction Set with Approximate Homotopy · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization
0.412019
Safe Grid Search with Optimal Complexity · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory › regularization theory
regularization path
0.412019
Safe Grid Search with Optimal Complexity · ICML 2019
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
self-concordant function
0.412019
Safe Grid Search with Optimal Complexity · ICML 2019
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.312017
Gap Safe Screening Rules for Sparsity Enforcing Penalties · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

conformal prediction · 1.3coordinate descent · 1.0stochastic differential equation · 0.9repellency terms · 0.9regression-as-classification · 0.8proximal operator · 0.8orthogonal projection · 0.8exponential moving average · 0.8convex optimization · 0.8constrained minimization · 0.8grid search · 0.4gradient descent · 0.4duality gap computation · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Shielded Diffusion: Generating Novel and Diverse Images using Sparse Repellency
abstract
The adoption of text-to-image diffusion models raises concerns over reliability, drawing scrutiny under the lens of various metrics like calibration, fairness, or compute efficiency. We focus in this work on two issues that arise when deploying these models: a lack of diversity when prompting images, and a tendency to recreate images from the training set. To solve both problems, we propose a method that coaxes the sampled trajectories of pretrained diffusion models to land on images that fall outside of a reference set. We achieve this by adding repellency terms to the diffusion SDE throughout the generation trajectory, which are triggered whenever the path is expected to land too closely to an image in the shielded reference set. Our method is sparse in the sense that these repellency terms are zero and inactive most of the time, and even more so towards the end of the generation trajectory. Our method, named SPELL for sparse repellency, can be used either with a static reference set that contains protected images, or dynamically, by updating the set at each timestep with the expected images concurrently generated within a batch, and with the images of previously generated batches. We show that adding SPELL to popular diffusion models improves their diversity while impacting their FID only marginally, and performs comparatively better than other recent training-free diversity methods. We also demonstrate how SPELL can ensure a shielded generation away from a very large set of protected images by considering all 1.2M images from ImageNet as the protected set.
Michael Kirchhof 0002, James Thornton, Louis Béthune, Pierre Ablin, Eugène Ndiaye, Marco Cuturi
ICML5
2024 Conformal Prediction via Regression-as-Classification
abstract
Conformal prediction (CP) for regression can be challenging, especially when the output distribution is heteroscedastic, multimodal, or skewed. Some of the issues can be addressed by estimating a distribution over the output, but in reality, such approaches can be sensitive to estimation error and yield unstable intervals. Here, we circumvent the challenges by converting regression to a classification problem and then use CP for classification to obtain CP sets for regression. To preserve the ordering of the continuous-output space, we design a new loss function and present necessary modifications to the CP classification techniques. Empirical results on many benchmarks show that this simple approach gives surprisingly good results on many practical problems.
Etash Kumar Guha, Shlok Natarajan, Thomas Möllenhoff, Mohammad Emtiyaz Khan, Eugène Ndiaye
ICLR5
2024 Careful with that Scalpel: Improving Gradient Surgery with an EMA
abstract
Beyond minimizing a single training loss, many deep learning estimation pipelines rely on an auxiliary objective to quantify and encourage desirable properties of the model (e.g. performance on another dataset, robustness, agreement with a prior). Although the simplest approach to incorporating an auxiliary loss is to sum it with the training loss as a regularizer, recent works have shown that one can improve performance by blending the gradients beyond a simple sum; this is known as *gradient surgery*. We cast the problem as a constrained minimization problem where the auxiliary objective is minimized among the set of minimizers of the training loss. To solve this bilevel problem, we follow a parameter update direction that combines the training loss gradient and the orthogonal projection of the auxiliary gradient to the training gradient. In a setting where gradients come from mini-batches, we explain how, using a moving average of the training loss gradients, we can carefully maintain this critical orthogonality property. We demonstrate that our method, Bloop, can lead to much better performances on NLP and vision experiments than other gradient surgery methods without EMA.
Yu-Guan Hsieh, James Thornton, Eugène Ndiaye, Michal Klein, Marco Cuturi, Pierre Ablin
ICML3
2024 Learning Elastic Costs to Shape Monge Displacements
abstract
Given a source and a target probability measure, the Monge problem studies efficient ways to map the former onto the latter. This efficiency is quantified by defining a *cost* function between source and target data. Such a cost is often set by default in the machine learning literature to the squared-Euclidean distance, $\ell^2\_2(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{y}):=\tfrac12\|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{y}\|\_2^2$. The benefits of using *elastic* costs, defined using a regularizer $\tau$ as $c(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{y}):=\ell^2_2(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{y})+\tau(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{y})$, was recently highlighted in (Cuturi et al. 2023). Such costs shape the *displacements* of Monge maps $T$, namely the difference between a source point and its image $T(\mathbf{x})-\mathbf{x}$, by giving them a structure that matches that of the proximal operator of $\tau$. In this work, we make two important contributions to the study of elastic costs:*(i)* For any elastic cost, we propose a numerical method to compute Monge maps that are provably optimal. This provides a much-needed routine to create synthetic problems where the ground-truth OT map is known, by analogy to the Brenier theorem, which states that the gradient of any convex potential is always a valid Monge map for the $\ell_2^2$ cost; *(ii)* We propose a loss to *learn* the parameter $\theta$ of a parameterized regularizer $\tau_\theta$, and apply it in the case where $\tau_{A}({\bf z}):=\|A^\perp {\bf z}\|^2_2$. This regularizer promotes displacements that lie on a low-dimensional subspace of $\mathbb{R}^d$, spanned by the $p$ rows of $A\in\mathbb{R}^{p\times d}$. We illustrate the soundness of our procedure on synthetic data, generated using our first contribution, in which we show near-perfect recovery of $A$'s subspace using only samples. We demonstrate the applicability of this method by showing predictive improvements on single-cell data tasks.
Michal Klein, Aram-Alexandre Pooladian, Pierre Ablin, Eugène Ndiaye, Jonathan Weed, Marco Cuturi
NeurIPS4
2023 Conformalization of Sparse Generalized Linear Models
abstract
Given a sequence of observable variables $\{(x_1, y_1), \ldots, (x_n, y_n)\}$, the conformal prediction method estimates a confidence set for $y_{n+1}$ given $x_{n+1}$ that is valid for any finite sample size by merely assuming that the joint distribution of the data is permutation invariant. Although attractive, computing such a set is computationally infeasible in most regression problems. Indeed, in these cases, the unknown variable $y_{n+1}$ can take an infinite number of possible candidate values, and generating conformal sets requires retraining a predictive model for each candidate. In this paper, we focus on a sparse linear model with only a subset of variables for prediction and use numerical continuation techniques to approximate the solution path efficiently. The critical property we exploit is that the set of selected variables is invariant under a small perturbation of the input data. Therefore, it is sufficient to enumerate and refit the model only at the change points of the set of active features and smoothly interpolate the rest of the solution via a Predictor-Corrector mechanism. We show how our path-following algorithm accurately approximates conformal prediction sets and illustrate its performance using synthetic and real data examples.
Etash Kumar Guha, Eugène Ndiaye, Xiaoming Huo
ICML2
2023 Root-finding approaches for computing conformal prediction set
Eugène Ndiaye, Ichiro Takeuchi
Mach. Learn.1
2022 Stable Conformal Prediction Sets
abstract
When one observes a sequence of variables $(x_1, y_1), \ldots, (x_n, y_n)$, Conformal Prediction (CP) is a methodology that allows to estimate a confidence set for $y_{n+1}$ given $x_{n+1}$ by merely assuming that the distribution of the data is exchangeable. CP sets have guaranteed coverage for any finite population size $n$. While appealing, the computation of such a set turns out to be infeasible in general, \eg when the unknown variable $y_{n+1}$ is continuous. The bottleneck is that it is based on a procedure that readjusts a prediction model on data where we replace the unknown target by all its possible values in order to select the most probable one. This requires computing an infinite number of models, which often makes it intractable. In this paper, we combine CP techniques with classical algorithmic stability bounds to derive a prediction set computable with a single model fit. We demonstrate that our proposed confidence set does not lose any coverage guarantees while avoiding the need for data splitting as currently done in the literature. We provide some numerical experiments to illustrate the tightness of our estimation when the sample size is sufficiently large, on both synthetic and real datasets.
Eugène Ndiaye
ICML1
2019 Safe Grid Search with Optimal Complexity
abstract
Popular machine learning estimators involve regularization parameters that can be challenging to tune, and standard strategies rely on grid search for this task. In this paper, we revisit the techniques of approximating the regularization path up to predefined tolerance $\epsilon$ in a unified framework and show that its complexity is $O(1/\sqrt[d]{\epsilon})$ for uniformly convex loss of order $d \geq 2$ and $O(1/\sqrt{\epsilon})$ for Generalized Self-Concordant functions. This framework encompasses least-squares but also logistic regression, a case that as far as we know was not handled as precisely in previous works. We leverage our technique to provide refined bounds on the validation error as well as a practical algorithm for hyperparameter tuning. The latter has global convergence guarantee when targeting a prescribed accuracy on the validation set. Last but not least, our approach helps relieving the practitioner from the (often neglected) task of selecting a stopping criterion when optimizing over the training set: our method automatically calibrates this criterion based on the targeted accuracy on the validation set.
Eugène Ndiaye, Tam Le, Olivier Fercoq, Joseph Salmon, Ichiro Takeuchi
ICML1
2019 Computing Full Conformal Prediction Set with Approximate Homotopy
abstract
If you are predicting the label $y$ of a new object with $\hat y$, how confident are you that $y = \hat y$? Conformal prediction methods provide an elegant framework for answering such question by building a $100 (1 - \alpha)\%$ confidence region without assumptions on the distribution of the data. It is based on a refitting procedure that parses all the possibilities for $y$ to select the most likely ones. Although providing strong coverage guarantees, conformal set is impractical to compute exactly for many regression problems. We propose efficient algorithms to compute conformal prediction set using approximated solution of (convex) regularized empirical risk minimization. Our approaches rely on a new homotopy continuation technique for tracking the solution path with respect to sequential changes of the observations. We also provide a detailed analysis quantifying its complexity.
Eugène Ndiaye, Ichiro Takeuchi
NeurIPS1
2017 Gap Safe Screening Rules for Sparsity Enforcing Penalties
abstract
In high dimensional regression settings, sparsity enforcing penalties have proved useful to regularize the data-fitting term. A recently introduced technique called screening rules propose to ignore some variables in the optimization leveraging the expected sparsity of the solutions and consequently leading to faster solvers. When the procedure is guaranteed not to discard variables wrongly the rules are said to be safe. In this work, we propose a unifying framework for generalized linear models regularized with standard sparsity enforcing penalties such as $\ell_1$ or $\ell_1/\ell_2$ norms. Our technique allows to discard safely more variables than previously considered safe rules, particularly for low regularization parameters. Our proposed Gap Safe rules (so called because they rely on duality gap computation) can cope with any iterative solver but are particularly well suited to (block) coordinate descent methods. Applied to many standard learning tasks, Lasso, Sparse Group Lasso, multi-task Lasso, binary and multinomial logistic regression, etc., we report significant speed-ups compared to previously proposed safe rules on all tested data sets.
Eugène Ndiaye, Olivier Fercoq, Alexandre Gramfort, Joseph Salmon
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2016 GAP Safe Screening Rules for Sparse-Group Lasso
abstract
For statistical learning in high dimension, sparse regularizations have proven useful to boost both computational and statistical efficiency. In some contexts, it is natural to handle more refined structures than pure sparsity, such as for instance group sparsity. Sparse-Group Lasso has recently been introduced in the context of linear regression to enforce sparsity both at the feature and at the group level. We propose the first (provably) safe screening rules for Sparse-Group Lasso, i.e., rules that allow to discard early in the solver features/groups that are inactive at optimal solution. Thanks to efficient dual gap computations relying on the geometric properties of $\epsilon$-norm, safe screening rules for Sparse-Group Lasso lead to significant gains in term of computing time for our coordinate descent implementation.
Eugène Ndiaye, Olivier Fercoq, Alexandre Gramfort, Joseph Salmon
NIPS1
2015 GAP Safe screening rules for sparse multi-task and multi-class models
abstract
High dimensional regression benefits from sparsity promoting regularizations. Screening rules leverage the known sparsity of the solution by ignoring some variables in the optimization, hence speeding up solvers. When the procedure is proven not to discard features wrongly the rules are said to be safe. In this paper we derive new safe rules for generalized linear models regularized with L1 and L1/L2 norms. The rules are based on duality gap computations and spherical safe regions whose diameters converge to zero. This allows to discard safely more variables, in particular for low regularization parameters. The GAP Safe rule can cope with any iterative solver and we illustrate its performance on coordinate descent for multi-task Lasso, binary and multinomial logistic regression, demonstrating significant speed ups on all tested datasets with respect to previous safe rules.
Eugène Ndiaye, Olivier Fercoq, Alexandre Gramfort, Joseph Salmon
NIPS1