Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Martín Arjovsky
dblp:164/6102
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Generative modeling · 33% Deep learning architectures and training · 18% Trustworthy machine learning · 16% |
Topics — the 19 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network |
0.9 | 3 | 2017 | Improved Training of Wasserstein GANs · NIPS 2017 Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks · ICML 2017 Towards Principled Methods for Training Generative Adversarial Networks · ICLR 2017 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Why does Throwing Away Data Improve Worst-Group Error? · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Why does Throwing Away Data Improve Worst-Group Error? · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
group robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Why does Throwing Away Data Improve Worst-Group Error? · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
image generation |
0.5 | 2 | 2020 | Low Distortion Block-Resampling with Spatially Stochastic Networks · NeurIPS 2020 Improved Training of Wasserstein GANs · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
conditional generative model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Low Distortion Block-Resampling with Spatially Stochastic Networks · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
directed exploration |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Never Give Up: Learning Directed Exploration Strategies · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
exploration strategies |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Never Give Up: Learning Directed Exploration Strategies · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
intrinsic motivation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Never Give Up: Learning Directed Exploration Strategies · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
physics-informed neural network |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Symplectic Recurrent Neural Networks · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
adversarial generative modeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Adversarially Learned Inference · ICLR (Poster) 2017 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › adversarial inference
adversarially learned inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Adversarially Learned Inference · ICLR (Poster) 2017 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Towards Principled Methods for Training Generative Adversarial Networks · ICLR 2017 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization › gradient regularization
gradient penalty |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Improved Training of Wasserstein GANs · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
latent representation learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Adversarially Learned Inference · ICLR (Poster) 2017 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network
Wasserstein GAN |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Unitary Evolution Recurrent Neural Networks · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
unitary recurrent neural network |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Unitary Evolution Recurrent Neural Networks · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training dynamics
vanishing and exploding gradients |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Unitary Evolution Recurrent Neural Networks · ICML 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
adversarial training · 0.9extreme value theory · 0.7empirical risk minimization · 0.7symplectic integration · 0.4recurrent neural network · 0.4deep reinforcement learning · 0.4conditional generation · 0.4block resampling · 0.4variational inference · 0.3gradient descent · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Why does Throwing Away Data Improve Worst-Group Error?abstractWhen facing data with imbalanced classes or groups, practitioners follow an intriguing strategy to achieve best results. They throw away examples until the classes or groups are balanced in size, and then perform empirical risk minimization on the reduced training set. This opposes common wisdom in learning theory, where the expected error is supposed to decrease as the dataset grows in size. In this work, we leverage extreme value theory to address this apparent contradiction. Our results show that the tails of the data distribution play an important role in determining the worst-group-accuracy of linear classifiers. When learning on data with heavy tails, throwing away data restores the geometric symmetry of the resulting classifier, and therefore improves its worst-group generalization. Kamalika Chaudhuri, Kartik Ahuja, Martín Arjovsky, David Lopez-Paz |
ICML | 3 |
| 2020 | Never Give Up: Learning Directed Exploration Strategies
Adrià Puigdomènech Badia, Pablo Sprechmann, Alex Vitvitskyi, Zhaohan Guo, Bilal Piot, Steven Kapturowski, Olivier Tieleman, Martín Arjovsky, Alexander Pritzel, Andrew Bolt, Charles Blundell |
ICLR | 8 |
| 2020 | Symplectic Recurrent Neural Networks
Zhengdao Chen, Martín Arjovsky, Léon Bottou |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2020 | Low Distortion Block-Resampling with Spatially Stochastic NetworksabstractWe formalize and attack the problem of generating new images from old ones that are as diverse as possible, only allowing them to change without restrictions in certain parts of the image while remaining globally consistent. This encompasses the typical situation found in generative modelling, where we are happy with parts of the generated data, but would like to resample others (``I like this generated castle overall, but this tower looks unrealistic, I would like a new one''). In order to attack this problem we build from the best conditional and unconditional generative models to introduce a new network architecture, training procedure, and a new algorithm for resampling parts of the image as desired. Sarah Jane Hong, Martín Arjovsky, Darryl Barnhart, Ian Thompson |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2017 | Towards Principled Methods for Training Generative Adversarial Networks
Martín Arjovsky, Léon Bottou |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2017 | Adversarially Learned Inference
Vincent Dumoulin, Mohamed Ishmael Belghazi, Ben Poole, Alex Lamb, Martín Arjovsky, Olivier Mastropietro, Aaron C. Courville |
ICLR (Poster) | 5 |
| 2017 | Wasserstein Generative Adversarial NetworksabstractWe introduce a new algorithm named WGAN, an alternative to traditional GAN training. In this new model, we show that we can improve the stability of learning, get rid of problems like mode collapse, and provide meaningful learning curves useful for debugging and hyperparameter searches. Furthermore, we show that the corresponding optimization problem is sound, and provide extensive theoretical work highlighting the deep connections to different distances between distributions. Martín Arjovsky, Soumith Chintala, Léon Bottou |
ICML | 1 |
| 2017 | Improved Training of Wasserstein GANsabstractGenerative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are powerful generative models, but suffer from training instability. The recently proposed Wasserstein GAN (WGAN) makes progress toward stable training of GANs, but sometimes can still generate only poor samples or fail to converge. We find that these problems are often due to the use of weight clipping in WGAN to enforce a Lipschitz constraint on the critic, which can lead to undesired behavior. We propose an alternative to clipping weights: penalize the norm of gradient of the critic with respect to its input. Our proposed method performs better than standard WGAN and enables stable training of a wide variety of GAN architectures with almost no hyperparameter tuning, including 101-layer ResNets and language models with continuous generators. We also achieve high quality generations on CIFAR-10 and LSUN bedrooms. Ishaan Gulrajani, Faruk Ahmed, Martín Arjovsky, Vincent Dumoulin, Aaron C. Courville |
NIPS | 3 |
| 2016 | Unitary Evolution Recurrent Neural NetworksabstractRecurrent neural networks (RNNs) are notoriously difficult to train. When the eigenvalues of the hidden to hidden weight matrix deviate from absolute value 1, optimization becomes difficult due to the well studied issue of vanishing and exploding gradients, especially when trying to learn long-term dependencies. To circumvent this problem, we propose a new architecture that learns a unitary weight matrix, with eigenvalues of absolute value exactly 1. The challenge we address is that of parametrizing unitary matrices in a way that does not require expensive computations (such as eigendecomposition) after each weight update. We construct an expressive unitary weight matrix by composing several structured matrices that act as building blocks with parameters to be learned. Optimization with this parameterization becomes feasible only when considering hidden states in the complex domain. We demonstrate the potential of this architecture by achieving state of the art results in several hard tasks involving very long-term dependencies. Martín Arjovsky, Amar Shah 0001, Yoshua Bengio |
ICML | 1 |