Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Burton I. Edelson

dblp:164/6872 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1987
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks
satellite communication
0.011987
The Evolution of the Geostationary Platfom Concept · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1987
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks
satellite systems
0.011987
The Evolution of the Geostationary Platfom Concept · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1987

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

conceptual review · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1987 The Evolution of the Geostationary Platfom Concept
abstract
The paper will review the conceptual development over the last decade of the use of very large spacecraft, i.e., "platforms," in geostationary orbit. Geostationary platforms were originally conceived as an efficient means of increasing the capacity at a point in the geostationary orbital arc. This geostationary platform was seen as a solution to the predicted crowding of the orbital arc since it could provide the functions of many individual satellites of conventional design. Also, geostationary platforms have been suggested for mounting very large antennas as will be required for mobile communications, or high power sources as will be required for broadcast services to small terminals. More recently these "large satellite" platforms were also envisioned as including earth observation and other science payloads. The advent of the Space Station which can provide a staging base for platform assembly and test in space at low earth orbit (LEO), prior to launch to geostationary earth orbit (GEO), will introduce a new dimension to practical platform design. This dimension has reintroduced the geostationary platform concept as a potential communications and science spacecraft of the post-IOC-Space Station family. This paper describes the evolution of concepts for geostationary platforms over the last decade based on both communications and science user scenarios developed worldwide.
Burton I. Edelson, Robert R. Lovell, C. Louis Cuccia
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.1