Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pavel E. Dvurechensky

dblp:164/7242 · also Pavel E. Dvurechenskii · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
17ranked-venue papers
5as first author
10since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-1201-2343ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 17 · 5 first-author · 10 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
13 papers
Mathematical optimization · 98% Computational complexity · 2%
Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 83% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 8% Efficient and distributed learning · 6%

Topics — the 30 heaviest of 42, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization
2.032024
High-Probability Convergence for Composite and Distributed Stochastic Minimization and Variational Inequalities with Heavy-Tailed Noise · ICML 2024
High-Probability Bounds for Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inequalities: the Case of Unbounded Variance · ICML 2023
Clipped Stochastic Methods for Variational Inequalities with Heavy-Tailed Noise · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
variational inequality
2.032024
High-Probability Convergence for Composite and Distributed Stochastic Minimization and Variational Inequalities with Heavy-Tailed Noise · ICML 2024
High-Probability Bounds for Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inequalities: the Case of Unbounded Variance · ICML 2023
Clipped Stochastic Methods for Variational Inequalities with Heavy-Tailed Noise · NeurIPS 2022
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
1.842022
The power of first-order smooth optimization for black-box non-smooth problems · ICML 2022
On a Combination of Alternating Minimization and Nesterov's Momentum · ICML 2021
Optimal Tensor Methods in Smooth Convex and Uniformly ConvexOptimization · COLT 2019
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic optimization
high-probability convergence
1.422024
High-Probability Convergence for Composite and Distributed Stochastic Minimization and Variational Inequalities with Heavy-Tailed Noise · ICML 2024
High-Probability Bounds for Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inequalities: the Case of Unbounded Variance · ICML 2023
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization
1.332024
Barrier Algorithms for Constrained Non-Convex Optimization · ICML 2024
On a Combination of Alternating Minimization and Nesterov's Momentum · ICML 2021
Learning Supervised PageRank with Gradient-Based and Gradient-Free Optimization Methods · NIPS 2016
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport
1.342024
On the Complexity of Approximating Wasserstein Barycenters · ICML 2019
Decentralize and Randomize: Faster Algorithm for Wasserstein Barycenters · NeurIPS 2018
Computational Optimal Transport: Complexity by Accelerated Gradient Descent Is Better Than by Sinkhorn's Algorithm · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic optimization
heavy-tailed noise
0.822024
Clipped Stochastic Methods for Variational Inequalities with Heavy-Tailed Noise · NeurIPS 2022
High-Probability Convergence for Composite and Distributed Stochastic Minimization and Variational Inequalities with Heavy-Tailed Noise · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
distributed optimization
0.812024
High-Probability Convergence for Composite and Distributed Stochastic Minimization and Variational Inequalities with Heavy-Tailed Noise · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
sampling
0.812024
Interaction-Force Transport Gradient Flows · NeurIPS 2024
Mathematical optimization
constrained optimization
0.812024
Barrier Algorithms for Constrained Non-Convex Optimization · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods › gradient-based optimization
gradient flow
0.812024
Interaction-Force Transport Gradient Flows · NeurIPS 2024
Mathematical optimization › numerical computation › numerical optimization › second-order methods
interior point methods
0.812024
Barrier Algorithms for Constrained Non-Convex Optimization · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization › convergence analysis
iteration complexity
0.822019
Optimal Tensor Methods in Smooth Convex and Uniformly ConvexOptimization · COLT 2019
Near Optimal Methods for Minimizing Convex Functions with Lipschitz $p$-th Derivatives · COLT 2019
Mathematical optimization
tensor methods
0.822019
Optimal Tensor Methods in Smooth Convex and Uniformly ConvexOptimization · COLT 2019
Near Optimal Methods for Minimizing Convex Functions with Lipschitz $p$-th Derivatives · COLT 2019
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods › gradient-based optimization
accelerated gradient methods
0.722019
On the Complexity of Approximating Wasserstein Barycenters · ICML 2019
Computational Optimal Transport: Complexity by Accelerated Gradient Descent Is Better Than by Sinkhorn's Algorithm · ICML 2018
Mathematical optimization › distributed optimization
decentralized optimization
0.722019
On the Complexity of Approximating Wasserstein Barycenters · ICML 2019
Decentralize and Randomize: Faster Algorithm for Wasserstein Barycenters · NeurIPS 2018
Mathematical optimization
distributed optimization
0.722019
On the Complexity of Approximating Wasserstein Barycenters · ICML 2019
Decentralize and Randomize: Faster Algorithm for Wasserstein Barycenters · NeurIPS 2018
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
wasserstein barycenter
0.722019
On the Complexity of Approximating Wasserstein Barycenters · ICML 2019
Decentralize and Randomize: Faster Algorithm for Wasserstein Barycenters · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning
0.612022
Decentralized Local Stochastic Extra-Gradient for Variational Inequalities · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
minimax optimization
0.612022
Clipped Stochastic Methods for Variational Inequalities with Heavy-Tailed Noise · NeurIPS 2022
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
first-order methods
0.612022
The power of first-order smooth optimization for black-box non-smooth problems · ICML 2022
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
smooth optimization
0.612022
The power of first-order smooth optimization for black-box non-smooth problems · ICML 2022
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › variational inequality
stochastic variational inequalities
0.612022
Decentralized Local Stochastic Extra-Gradient for Variational Inequalities · NeurIPS 2022
Mathematical optimization › black-box optimization
zeroth-order optimization
0.612022
The power of first-order smooth optimization for black-box non-smooth problems · ICML 2022
Distributed systems
distributed optimization
0.512021
Newton Method over Networks is Fast up to the Statistical Precision · ICML 2021
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods
accelerated first-order methods
0.512021
On a Combination of Alternating Minimization and Nesterov's Momentum · ICML 2021
Mathematical optimization › numerical computation › numerical optimization › second-order methods
cubic regularization
0.512021
Newton Method over Networks is Fast up to the Statistical Precision · ICML 2021
Mathematical optimization › numerical computation › numerical optimization › second-order methods
newton's method
0.512021
Newton Method over Networks is Fast up to the Statistical Precision · ICML 2021
Mathematical optimization
frank-wolfe algorithm
0.412020
Self-Concordant Analysis of Frank-Wolfe Algorithms · ICML 2020
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
self-concordant function
0.412020
Self-Concordant Analysis of Frank-Wolfe Algorithms · ICML 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reproducing kernel hilbert space · 1.5maximum mean discrepancy · 1.5JKO splitting · 1.5decentralized optimization · 1.5gradient clipping · 1.3stochastic extra-gradient · 1.1tensor methods · 0.8stochastic gradient difference clipping · 0.8self-concordant barrier · 0.8second-order method · 0.8first-order methods · 0.8KKT conditions · 0.8entropic regularization · 0.7stochastic optimization · 0.7high-probability bounds · 0.7local updates · 0.6preconditioned newton step · 0.5hessian subsampling · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Analysis of Kernel Mirror Prox for Measure Optimization
abstract
By choosing a suitable function space as the dual to the non-negative measure cone, we study in a unified framework a class of functional saddle-point optimization problems, which we term the Mixed Functional Nash Equilibrium (MFNE), that underlies several existing machine learning algorithms, such as implicit generative models, distributionally robust optimization (DRO), and Wasserstein barycenters. We model the saddle-point optimization dynamics as an interacting Fisher-Rao-RKHS gradient flow when the function space is chosen as a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). As a discrete time counterpart, we propose a primal-dual kernel mirror prox (KMP) algorithm, which uses a dual step in the RKHS, and a primal entropic mirror prox step. We then provide a unified convergence analysis of KMP in an infinite-dimensional setting for this class of MFNE problems, which establishes a convergence rate of $O(1/N)$ in the deterministic case and $O(1/\sqrt{N})$ in the stochastic case, where $N$ is the iteration counter. As a case study, we apply our analysis to DRO, providing algorithmic guarantees for DRO robustness and convergence.
Pavel E. Dvurechensky, Jia-Jie Zhu
AISTATS1
2024 Barrier Algorithms for Constrained Non-Convex Optimization
abstract
In this paper we theoretically show that interior-point methods based on self-concordant barriers possess favorable global complexity beyond their standard application area of convex optimization. To do that we propose first- and second-order methods for non-convex optimization problems with general convex set constraints and linear constraints. Our methods attain a suitably defined class of approximate first- or second-order KKT points with the worst-case iteration complexity similar to unconstrained problems, namely $O(\varepsilon^{-2})$ (first-order) and $O(\varepsilon^{-3/2})$ (second-order), respectively.
Pavel E. Dvurechensky, Mathias Staudigl
ICML1
2024 High-Probability Convergence for Composite and Distributed Stochastic Minimization and Variational Inequalities with Heavy-Tailed Noise
abstract
High-probability analysis of stochastic first-order optimization methods under mild assumptions on the noise has been gaining a lot of attention in recent years. Typically, gradient clipping is one of the key algorithmic ingredients to derive good high-probability guarantees when the noise is heavy-tailed. However, if implemented naively, clipping can spoil the convergence of the popular methods for composite and distributed optimization (Prox-SGD/Parallel SGD) even in the absence of any noise. Due to this reason, many works on high-probability analysis consider only unconstrained non-distributed problems, and the existing results for composite/distributed problems do not include some important special cases (like strongly convex problems) and are not optimal. To address this issue, we propose new stochastic methods for composite and distributed optimization based on the clipping of stochastic gradient differences and prove tight high-probability convergence results (including nearly optimal ones) for the new methods. In addition, we also develop new methods for composite and distributed variational inequalities and analyze the high-probability convergence of these methods.
Eduard Gorbunov, Abdurakhmon Sadiev, Marina Danilova, Samuel Horváth, Gauthier Gidel, Pavel E. Dvurechensky, Alexander V. Gasnikov, Peter Richtárik
ICML6
2024 Interaction-Force Transport Gradient Flows
abstract
This paper presents a new gradient flow dissipation geometry over non-negative and probability measures. This is motivated by a principled construction that combines the unbalanced optimal transport and interaction forces modeled by reproducing kernels. Using a precise connection between the Hellinger geometry and the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD), we propose the interaction-force transport (IFT) gradient flows and its spherical variant via an infimal convolution of the Wasserstein and spherical MMD tensors. We then develop a particle-based optimization algorithm based on the JKO-splitting scheme of the mass-preserving spherical IFT gradient flows. Finally, we provide both theoretical global exponential convergence guarantees and improved empirical simulation results for applying the IFT gradient flows to the sampling task of MMD-minimization. Furthermore, we prove that the spherical IFT gradient flow enjoys the best of both worlds by providing the global exponential convergence guarantee for both the MMD and KL energy.
Egor Gladin, Pavel E. Dvurechensky, Alexander Mielke, Jia-Jie Zhu
NeurIPS2
2023 High-Probability Bounds for Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inequalities: the Case of Unbounded Variance
abstract
During the recent years the interest of optimization and machine learning communities in high-probability convergence of stochastic optimization methods has been growing. One of the main reasons for this is that high-probability complexity bounds are more accurate and less studied than in-expectation ones. However, SOTA high-probability non-asymptotic convergence results are derived under strong assumptions such as boundedness of the gradient noise variance or of the objective's gradient itself. In this paper, we propose several algorithms with high-probability convergence results under less restrictive assumptions. In particular, we derive new high-probability convergence results under the assumption that the gradient/operator noise has bounded central $\alpha$-th moment for $\alpha \in (1,2]$ in the following setups: (i) smooth non-convex / Polyak-Lojasiewicz / convex / strongly convex / quasi-strongly convex minimization problems, (ii) Lipschitz / star-cocoercive and monotone / quasi-strongly monotone variational inequalities. These results justify the usage of the considered methods for solving problems that do not fit standard functional classes studied in stochastic optimization.
Abdurakhmon Sadiev, Marina Danilova, Eduard Gorbunov, Samuel Horváth, Gauthier Gidel, Pavel E. Dvurechensky, Alexander V. Gasnikov, Peter Richtárik
ICML6
2022 The power of first-order smooth optimization for black-box non-smooth problems
abstract
Gradient-free/zeroth-order methods for black-box convex optimization have been extensively studied in the last decade with the main focus on oracle calls complexity. In this paper, besides the oracle complexity, we focus also on iteration complexity, and propose a generic approach that, based on optimal first-order methods, allows to obtain in a black-box fashion new zeroth-order algorithms for non-smooth convex optimization problems. Our approach not only leads to optimal oracle complexity, but also allows to obtain iteration complexity similar to first-order methods, which, in turn, allows to exploit parallel computations to accelerate the convergence of our algorithms. We also elaborate on extensions for stochastic optimization problems, saddle-point problems, and distributed optimization.
Alexander V. Gasnikov, Anton Novitskii, Vasilii Novitskii, Farshed Abdukhakimov, Dmitry Kamzolov, Aleksandr Beznosikov, Martin Takác 0001, Pavel E. Dvurechensky, Bin Gu 0001
ICML8
2022 Decentralized Local Stochastic Extra-Gradient for Variational Inequalities
abstract
We consider distributed stochastic variational inequalities (VIs) on unbounded domains with the problem data that is heterogeneous (non-IID) and distributed across many devices. We make a very general assumption on the computational network that, in particular, covers the settings of fully decentralized calculations with time-varying networks and centralized topologies commonly used in Federated Learning. Moreover, multiple local updates on the workers can be made for reducing the communication frequency between the workers.We extend the stochastic extragradient method to this very general setting and theoretically analyze its convergence rate in the strongly-monotone, monotone, and non-monotone (when a Minty solution exists) settings. The provided rates explicitly exhibit the dependence on network characteristics (e.g., mixing time), iteration counter, data heterogeneity, variance, number of devices, and other standard parameters. As a special case, our method and analysis apply to distributed stochastic saddle-point problems (SPP), e.g., to the training of Deep Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) for which decentralized training has been reported to be extremely challenging. In experiments for the decentralized training of GANs we demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed approach.
Aleksandr Beznosikov, Pavel E. Dvurechensky, Anastasia Koloskova, Valentin Samokhin, Sebastian U. Stich, Alexander V. Gasnikov
NeurIPS2
2022 Clipped Stochastic Methods for Variational Inequalities with Heavy-Tailed Noise
abstract
Stochastic first-order methods such as Stochastic Extragradient (SEG) or Stochastic Gradient Descent-Ascent (SGDA) for solving smooth minimax problems and, more generally, variational inequality problems (VIP) have been gaining a lot of attention in recent years due to the growing popularity of adversarial formulations in machine learning. While high-probability convergence bounds are known to more accurately reflect the actual behavior of stochastic methods, most convergence results are provided in expectation. Moreover, the only known high-probability complexity results have been derived under restrictive sub-Gaussian (light-tailed) noise and bounded domain assumptions [Juditsky et al., 2011]. In this work, we prove the first high-probability complexity results with logarithmic dependence on the confidence level for stochastic methods for solving monotone and structured non-monotone VIPs with non-sub-Gaussian (heavy-tailed) noise and unbounded domains. In the monotone case, our results match the best known ones in the light-tails case [Juditsky et al., 2011], and are novel for structured non-monotone problems such as negative comonotone, quasi-strongly monotone, and/or star-cocoercive ones. We achieve these results by studying SEG and SGDA with clipping. In addition, we numerically validate that the gradient noise of many practical GAN formulations is heavy-tailed and show that clipping improves the performance of SEG/SGDA.
Eduard Gorbunov, Marina Danilova, David Dobre, Pavel E. Dvurechensky, Alexander V. Gasnikov, Gauthier Gidel
NeurIPS4
2021 Newton Method over Networks is Fast up to the Statistical Precision
abstract
We propose a distributed cubic regularization of the Newton method for solving (constrained) empirical risk minimization problems over a network of agents, modeled as undirected graph. The algorithm employs an inexact, preconditioned Newton step at each agent’s side: the gradient of the centralized loss is iteratively estimated via a gradient-tracking consensus mechanism and the Hessian is subsampled over the local data sets. No Hessian matrices are exchanged over the network. We derive global complexity bounds for convex and strongly convex losses. Our analysis reveals an interesting interplay between sample and iteration/communication complexity: statistically accurate solutions are achievable in roughly the same number of iterations of the centralized cubic Newton, with a communication cost per iteration of the order of $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}\big(1/\sqrt{1-\rho}\big)$, where $\rho$ characterizes the connectivity of the network. This represents a significant improvement with respect to existing, statistically oblivious, distributed Newton-based methods over networks.
Amir Daneshmand, Gesualdo Scutari, Pavel E. Dvurechensky, Alexander V. Gasnikov
ICML3
2021 On a Combination of Alternating Minimization and Nesterov's Momentum
abstract
Alternating minimization (AM) procedures are practically efficient in many applications for solving convex and non-convex optimization problems. On the other hand, Nesterov’s accelerated gradient is theoretically optimal first-order method for convex optimization. In this paper we combine AM and Nesterov’s acceleration to propose an accelerated alternating minimization algorithm. We prove $1/k^2$ convergence rate in terms of the objective for convex problems and $1/k$ in terms of the squared gradient norm for non-convex problems, where $k$ is the iteration counter. Our method does not require any knowledge of neither convexity of the problem nor function parameters such as Lipschitz constant of the gradient, i.e. it is adaptive to convexity and smoothness and is uniformly optimal for smooth convex and non-convex problems. Further, we develop its primal-dual modification for strongly convex problems with linear constraints and prove the same $1/k^2$ for the primal objective residual and constraints feasibility.
Sergey Guminov, Pavel E. Dvurechensky, Nazarii Tupitsa, Alexander V. Gasnikov
ICML2
2020 Self-Concordant Analysis of Frank-Wolfe Algorithms
abstract
Projection-free optimization via different variants of the Frank-Wolfe (FW), a.k.a. Conditional Gradient method has become one of the cornerstones in optimization for machine learning since in many cases the linear minimization oracle is much cheaper to implement than projections and some sparsity needs to be preserved. In a number of applications, e.g. Poisson inverse problems or quantum state tomography, the loss is given by a self-concordant (SC) function having unbounded curvature, implying absence of theoretical guarantees for the existing FW methods. We use the theory of SC functions to provide a new adaptive step size for FW methods and prove global convergence rate O(1/k) after k iterations. If the problem admits a stronger local linear minimization oracle, we construct a novel FW method with linear convergence rate for SC functions.
Pavel E. Dvurechensky, Petr Ostroukhov, Kamil Safin, Shimrit Shtern, Mathias Staudigl
ICML1
2019 Near Optimal Methods for Minimizing Convex Functions with Lipschitz $p$-th Derivatives
abstract
In this merged paper, we consider the problem of minimizing a convex function with Lipschitz-continuous $p$-th order derivatives. Given an oracle which when queried at a point returns the first $p$-derivatives of the function at that point we provide some methods which compute an $\e$ approximate minimizer in $O\left(\e^{-\frac{2}{3p+1}} \right)$ iterations. These methods match known lower bounds up to polylogarithmic factors for constant $p$.
Alexander V. Gasnikov, Pavel E. Dvurechensky, Eduard Gorbunov, Evgeniya A. Vorontsova, Daniil Selikhanovych, César A. Uribe, Bo Jiang 0007, Shuzhong Zhang, Sébastien Bubeck, Qijia Jiang, Yin Tat Lee, Yuanzhi Li, Aaron Sidford
COLT2
2019 Optimal Tensor Methods in Smooth Convex and Uniformly ConvexOptimization
abstract
We consider convex optimization problems with the objective function having Lipshitz-continuous $p$-th order derivative, where $p\geq 1$. We propose a new tensor method, which closes the gap between the lower $\Omega\left(\e^{-\frac{2}{3p+1}} \right)$ and upper $O\left(\e^{-\frac{1}{p+1}} \right)$ iteration complexity bounds for this class of optimization problems. We also consider uniformly convex functions, and show how the proposed method can be accelerated under this additional assumption. Moreover, we introduce a $p$-th order condition number which naturally arises in the complexity analysis of tensor methods under this assumption. Finally, we make a numerical study of the proposed optimal method and show that in practice it is faster than the best known accelerated tensor method. We also compare the performance of tensor methods for $p=2$ and $p=3$ and show that the 3rd-order method is superior to the 2nd-order method in practice.
Alexander V. Gasnikov, Pavel E. Dvurechensky, Eduard Gorbunov, Evgeniya A. Vorontsova, Daniil Selikhanovych, César A. Uribe
COLT2
2019 On the Complexity of Approximating Wasserstein Barycenters
abstract
We study the complexity of approximating the Wasserstein barycenter of $m$ discrete measures, or histograms of size $n$, by contrasting two alternative approaches that use entropic regularization. The first approach is based on the Iterative Bregman Projections (IBP) algorithm for which our novel analysis gives a complexity bound proportional to ${mn^2}/{\varepsilon^2}$ to approximate the original non-regularized barycenter. On the other hand, using an approach based on accelerated gradient descent, we obtain a complexity proportional to ${mn^{2}}/{\varepsilon}$. As a byproduct, we show that the regularization parameter in both approaches has to be proportional to $\varepsilon$, which causes instability of both algorithms when the desired accuracy is high. To overcome this issue, we propose a novel proximal-IBP algorithm, which can be seen as a proximal gradient method, which uses IBP on each iteration to make a proximal step. We also consider the question of scalability of these algorithms using approaches from distributed optimization and show that the first algorithm can be implemented in a centralized distributed setting (master/slave), while the second one is amenable to a more general decentralized distributed setting with an arbitrary network topology.
Alexey Kroshnin, Nazarii Tupitsa, Darina Dvinskikh, Pavel E. Dvurechensky, Alexander V. Gasnikov, César A. Uribe
ICML4
2018 Computational Optimal Transport: Complexity by Accelerated Gradient Descent Is Better Than by Sinkhorn's Algorithm
abstract
We analyze two algorithms for approximating the general optimal transport (OT) distance between two discrete distributions of size $n$, up to accuracy $\varepsilon$. For the first algorithm, which is based on the celebrated Sinkhorn’s algorithm, we prove the complexity bound $\widetilde{O}\left(\frac{n^2}{\varepsilon^2}\right)$ arithmetic operations ($\widetilde{O}$ hides polylogarithmic factors $(\ln n)^c$, $c>0$). For the second one, which is based on our novel Adaptive Primal-Dual Accelerated Gradient Descent (APDAGD) algorithm, we prove the complexity bound $\widetilde{O}\left(\min\left\{\frac{n^{9/4}}{\varepsilon}, \frac{n^{2}}{\varepsilon^2} \right\}\right)$ arithmetic operations. Both bounds have better dependence on $\varepsilon$ than the state-of-the-art result given by $\widetilde{O}\left(\frac{n^2}{\varepsilon^3}\right)$. Our second algorithm not only has better dependence on $\varepsilon$ in the complexity bound, but also is not specific to entropic regularization and can solve the OT problem with different regularizers.
Pavel E. Dvurechensky, Alexander V. Gasnikov, Alexey Kroshnin
ICML1
2018 Decentralize and Randomize: Faster Algorithm for Wasserstein Barycenters
abstract
We study the decentralized distributed computation of discrete approximations for the regularized Wasserstein barycenter of a finite set of continuous probability measures distributedly stored over a network. We assume there is a network of agents/machines/computers, and each agent holds a private continuous probability measure and seeks to compute the barycenter of all the measures in the network by getting samples from its local measure and exchanging information with its neighbors. Motivated by this problem, we develop, and analyze, a novel accelerated primal-dual stochastic gradient method for general stochastic convex optimization problems with linear equality constraints. Then, we apply this method to the decen- tralized distributed optimization setting to obtain a new algorithm for the distributed semi-discrete regularized Wasserstein barycenter problem. Moreover, we show explicit non-asymptotic complexity for the proposed algorithm. Finally, we show the effectiveness of our method on the distributed computation of the regularized Wasserstein barycenter of univariate Gaussian and von Mises distributions, as well as some applications to image aggregation.
Pavel E. Dvurechensky, Darina Dvinskikh, Alexander V. Gasnikov, César A. Uribe, Angelia Nedic
NeurIPS1
2016 Learning Supervised PageRank with Gradient-Based and Gradient-Free Optimization Methods
abstract
In this paper, we consider a non-convex loss-minimization problem of learning Supervised PageRank models, which can account for features of nodes and edges. We propose gradient-based and random gradient-free methods to solve this problem. Our algorithms are based on the concept of an inexact oracle and unlike the state-of-the-art gradient-based method we manage to provide theoretically the convergence rate guarantees for both of them. Finally, we compare the performance of the proposed optimization methods with the state of the art applied to a ranking task.
Lev Bogolubsky, Pavel E. Dvurechensky, Alexander V. Gasnikov, Gleb Gusev, Yurii E. Nesterov, Andrei M. Raigorodskii, Aleksey Tikhonov, Maksim Zhukovskii
NIPS2