Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jennifer E. King

dblp:164/8120 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 6 · 4 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 82% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 10% Robot manipulation · 8%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
1.042017
Unobservable Monte Carlo planning for nonprehensile rearrangement tasks · ICRA 2017
Rearrangement planning using object-centric and robot-centric action spaces · ICRA 2016
Nonprehensile whole arm rearrangement planning on physics manifolds · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › manipulation planning
rearrangement planning
1.042017
Unobservable Monte Carlo planning for nonprehensile rearrangement tasks · ICRA 2017
Rearrangement planning using object-centric and robot-centric action spaces · ICRA 2016
Nonprehensile whole arm rearrangement planning on physics manifolds · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
kinodynamic planning
0.422015
Nonprehensile whole arm rearrangement planning on physics manifolds · ICRA 2015
Kinodynamic randomized rearrangement planning via dynamic transitions between statically stable states · ICRA 2015
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
planning under uncertainty
0.312017
Unobservable Monte Carlo planning for nonprehensile rearrangement tasks · ICRA 2017
Robotics › Robot manipulation
nonprehensile manipulation
0.222017
Unobservable Monte Carlo planning for nonprehensile rearrangement tasks · ICRA 2017
Nonprehensile whole arm rearrangement planning on physics manifolds · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Robot manipulation
mobile manipulation
0.112016
Rearrangement planning using object-centric and robot-centric action spaces · ICRA 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

monte carlo tree search · 0.3learned policy · 0.3heuristic planning · 0.3robot-centric action space · 0.2object-centric action space · 0.2randomized planning · 0.2physics-based planning · 0.2physics simulation · 0.2RRT · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Unobservable Monte Carlo planning for nonprehensile rearrangement tasks
abstract
In this work, we present an anytime planner for creating open-loop trajectories that solve rearrangement planning problems under uncertainty using nonprehensile manipulation. We first extend the Monte Carlo Tree Search algorithm to the unobservable domain. We then propose two default policies that allow us to quickly determine the potential to achieve the goal while accounting for the contact that is critical to rearrangement planning. The first policy uses a learned model generated from a set of user demonstrations. This model can be quickly queried for a sequence of actions that attempts to create contact with objects and achieve the goal. The second policy uses a heuristically guided planner in a subspace of the full state space. Using these goal informed policies, we are able to find initial solutions to the problem quickly, then continuously refine the solutions as time allows. We demonstrate our algorithm on a 7 degree-of-freedom manipulator moving objects on a table.
Jennifer E. King, Vinitha Ranganeni, Siddhartha S. Srinivasa
ICRA1
2016 Rearrangement planning using object-centric and robot-centric action spaces
abstract
This paper addresses the problem of rearrangement planning, i.e. to find a feasible trajectory for a robot that must interact with multiple objects in order to achieve a goal. We propose a planner to solve the rearrangement planning problem by considering two different types of actions: robot-centric and object-centric. Object-centric actions guide the planner to perform specific actions on specific objects. Robot-centric actions move the robot without object relevant intent, easily allowing simultaneous object contact and whole arm interaction. We formulate a hybrid planner that uses both action types. We evaluate the planner on tasks for a mobile robot and a household manipulator.
Jennifer E. King, Marco Cognetti, Siddhartha S. Srinivasa
ICRA1
2015 Kinodynamic randomized rearrangement planning via dynamic transitions between statically stable states
abstract
In this work we present a fast kinodynamic RRT-planner that uses dynamic nonprehensile actions to rearrange cluttered environments. In contrast to many previous works, the presented planner is not restricted to quasi-static interactions and monotonicity. Instead the results of dynamic robot actions are predicted using a black box physics model. Given a general set of primitive actions and a physics model, the planner randomly explores the configuration space of the environment to find a sequence of actions that transform the environment into some goal configuration. In contrast to a naive kinodynamic RRT-planner we show that we can exploit the physical fact that in an environment with friction any object eventually comes to rest. This allows a search on the configuration space rather than the state space, reducing the dimension of the search space by a factor of two without restricting us to non-dynamic interactions. We compare our algorithm against a naive kinodynamic RRT-planner and show that on a variety of environments we can achieve a higher planning success rate given a restricted time budget for planning.
Joshua A. Haustein, Jennifer E. King, Siddhartha S. Srinivasa, Tamim Asfour
ICRA2
2015 Nonprehensile whole arm rearrangement planning on physics manifolds
abstract
We present a randomized kinodynamic planner that solves rearrangement planning problems. We embed a physics model into the planner to allow reasoning about interaction with objects in the environment. By carefully selecting this model, we are able to reduce our state and action space, gaining tractability in the search. The result is a planner capable of generating trajectories for full arm manipulation and simultaneous object interaction. We demonstrate the ability to solve more rearrangement by pushing tasks than existing primitive based solutions. Finally, we show the plans we generate are feasible for execution on a real robot.
Jennifer E. King, Joshua A. Haustein, Siddhartha S. Srinivasa, Tamim Asfour
ICRA1
2015 Robust trajectory selection for rearrangement planning as a multi-armed bandit problem
abstract
We present an algorithm for generating open-loop trajectories that solve the problem of rearrangement planning under uncertainty. We frame this as a selection problem where the goal is to choose the most robust trajectory from a finite set of candidates. We generate each candidate using a kinodynamic state space planner and evaluate it using noisy rollouts. Our key insight is we can formalize the selection problem as the “best arm” variant of the multi-armed bandit problem. We use the successive rejects algorithm to efficiently allocate rollouts between candidate trajectories given a rollout budget. We show that the successive rejects algorithm identifies the best candidate using fewer rollouts than a baseline algorithm in simulation. We also show that selecting a good candidate increases the likelihood of successful execution on a real robot.
Michael C. Koval, Jennifer E. King, Nancy S. Pollard, Siddhartha S. Srinivasa
IROS2
2009 Efficient cost computation in cost map planning for non-circular robots
abstract
For a robot with a circular footprint, obstacles in a map can be inflated by the radius of the footprint, and planning can treat the robot as a point robot. Many robotic vehicles however have non-circular footprints. When operating in cluttered spaces it therefore becomes important to evaluate the footprint of these robots against a cost map. This evaluation is one of the major computational burdens in planning for robots whose footprints can not be assumed to be circular. In this paper, we propose an efficient method for evaluating a footprint of the robot against a cost map. Our method involves a transformation of the set of points covered by the footprint of the robot into two sets of points: points that should be evaluated against the cost map with inflated obstacles, and points that should be evaluated against the original cost map. The cumulative number of these points is much smaller than the number of points in the original footprint of the robot. Moreover, the method automatically reduces the robot to a single point when its footprint is circular. On the theoretical side, the paper proves the correctness of our method. On the experimental side, the paper shows that the method results in a significant speedup.
Jennifer E. King, Maxim Likhachev
IROS1