Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Austin Gregg-Smith
dblp:164/8187
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Robot manipulation · 71% Motion planning and robot control · 29% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers |
Human-robot interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot manipulation › deformable object manipulation
cloth manipulation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Household Clothing Set and Benchmarks for Characterising End-Effector Cloth Manipulation · ICRA 2023 |
Human-robot interaction › physical human-robot interaction
handheld robot |
0.5 | 2 | 2016 | Investigating spatial guidance for a cooperative handheld robot · ICRA 2016 The design and evaluation of a cooperative handheld robot · ICRA 2015 |
Human-robot interaction › human-robot interface
robot feedback |
0.5 | 2 | 2016 | Investigating spatial guidance for a cooperative handheld robot · ICRA 2016 The design and evaluation of a cooperative handheld robot · ICRA 2015 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › cable-driven robot
cable-driven manipulator |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Inverse kinematics and design of a novel 6-DoF handheld robot arm · ICRA 2016 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
inverse kinematics |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Inverse kinematics and design of a novel 6-DoF handheld robot arm · ICRA 2016 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › inverse kinematics
redundant manipulator inverse kinematics |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Inverse kinematics and design of a novel 6-DoF handheld robot arm · ICRA 2016 |
Human-robot interaction
implicit feedback |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | The design and evaluation of a cooperative handheld robot · ICRA 2015 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
grasping |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Household Clothing Set and Benchmarks for Characterising End-Effector Cloth Manipulation · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › robot design
manipulator design |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Inverse kinematics and design of a novel 6-DoF handheld robot arm · ICRA 2016 |
Virtual and augmented reality
augmented reality display |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Investigating spatial guidance for a cooperative handheld robot · ICRA 2016 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › continuum robot
tendon-driven continuum robot |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | The design and evaluation of a cooperative handheld robot · ICRA 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
repeated measures ANOVA · 0.9benchmark framework · 0.7NASA Task Load Index · 0.5user study · 0.4space carving · 0.2inverse kinematics decomposition · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Household Clothing Set and Benchmarks for Characterising End-Effector Cloth ManipulationabstractThe highly varied and deformable structure of clothing presents a challenging task in the area of robot manipulation. Recent literature has shown an increasing interest in this field, however limited information exists on the influence of end-effector selection, instead focusing on the perception, modelling, and methodology in handling fabrics. Here, we present a benchmark set of household clothing items, along with a framework for defining textile features in relation to how the objects can be grasped and manipulated. Alongside these, we present four example benchmarks for evaluating the performance of a robot end-effector in relation to the grasping and manipulation of common pieces of clothing: Edge drag accuracy, edge grasp resilience, grasp encapsulation, and grasp fold generation. We perform these benchmarks on several common robot end-effectors (Franka Emika (FE) Hand with standard and Fin Ray® style fingers (Flex), Robotiq 2F-140, and the Openhand Model T42) and present and discuss their respective performances. Results show that the Robotiq scored highest across most benchmarks, closely followed by the FE hand. The T42 showed excellent encapsulation of items, while the FE (Flex) was particularly successful picking up flat edges. Angus B. Clark, Luke Cramphorn-Neal, Michal Rachowiecki, Austin Gregg-Smith |
ICRA | 4 |
| 2016 | Inverse kinematics and design of a novel 6-DoF handheld robot armabstractWe present a novel 6-DoF cable driven manipulator for handheld robotic tasks. Based on a coupled tendon approach, the arm is optimized to maximize movement speed and configuration space while reducing the total mass of the arm. We propose a space carving approach to design optimal link geometry maximizing structural strength and joint limits while minimizing link mass. The design improves on similar non-handheld tendon-driven manipulators and reduces the required number of actuators to one per DoF. As the manipulator has one redundant joint, we present a 5-DoF inverse kinematics solution for the end effector pose. The inverse kinematics is solved by splitting the 6-DoF problem into two coupled 3-DoF problems and merging their results. A method for gracefully degrading the output of the inverse kinematics is described for cases where the desired end effector pose is outside the configuration space. This is useful for settings where the user is in the control loop and can help the robot to get closer to the desired location. The design of the handheld robot is offered as open source. While our results and tools are aimed at handheld robotics, the design and approach is useful to non-handheld applications. Austin Gregg-Smith, Walterio W. Mayol-Cuevas |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2016 | Investigating spatial guidance for a cooperative handheld robotabstractIn this paper we address the question of how to provide feedback information to guide users of a handheld robotic device when performing a spatial exploration task. We consider various feedback methods for communicating a five degree of freedom target pose to a user including a stereoscopic VR display, a monocular see-through AR display and a 2D screen as well as robot arm gesturing. The spatial exploration task with the handheld robot arm was compared against a baseline of a passive handheld wand. We compared the performance of each of the methods with 21 volunteers using a repeated measures ANOVA experimental design, and recorded users' opinions via a NASA Task Load Index Survey. The robot assisted reaching feedback methods significantly outperform manual reaching with the wand for all three visual feedback methods. However, there is little difference between each of the three visual feedback methods when using the robot. The completion time of the task varies with changing difficulty when using the wand but remains stable when assisted by the robot. These results convey useful information for the design of cooperative handheld robots. Austin Gregg-Smith, Walterio W. Mayol-Cuevas |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2015 | The design and evaluation of a cooperative handheld robotabstractThis paper concerns itself with a relatively unexplored type of personal robot that operates in the tool space. Handheld robots aim to cooperate with the user to solve tasks and improve what tools can offer enhanced by actuation, sensing, and importantly, task knowledge. To this end, we devised a new lightweight robotic platform that has 4 DoF and uses a cable driven continuum structure. Feedback from the robot to the user is provided in an intuitive, implicit manner by the robot end effector pointing towards the goal, avoiding pointing, and/or refusing to perform an action when it conflicts with the task specification. We evaluate two generic tasks involving aiming in space and picking/placing objects with a number of volunteers. Repeated measures ANOVA is used to analyse results to show in which conditions an increased level of automation in the handheld robot improves task performance or user perception of task load. The robot is offered as an open robotics platform[1] and the results indicate directions to improve on feedback and interaction mechanisms. Austin Gregg-Smith, Walterio W. Mayol-Cuevas |
ICRA | 1 |