Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Brian Axelrod
dblp:164/8262
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
5as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8991-8915ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 67% Trustworthy machine learning · 17% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 16% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 79% Information theory · 21% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
positional encoding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LieRE: Lie Rotational Positional Encodings · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › positional encoding
rotary position embedding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LieRE: Lie Rotational Positional Encodings · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LieRE: Lie Rotational Positional Encodings · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
vision transformer |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LieRE: Lie Rotational Positional Encodings · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › causal machine learning
causal intervention |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Causal Strategic Linear Regression · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
parameter estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Causal Strategic Linear Regression · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › performative prediction
strategic classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Causal Strategic Linear Regression · ICML 2020 |
Information theory › statistical inference
distribution estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Sample Amplification: Increasing Dataset Size even when Learning is Impossible · ICML 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Near-optimal Approximate Discrete and Continuous Submodular Function Minimization · SODA 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
submodular function minimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Near-optimal Approximate Discrete and Continuous Submodular Function Minimization · SODA 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
maximum likelihood estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A Polynomial Time Algorithm for Log-Concave Maximum Likelihood via Locally Exponential Families · NeurIPS 2019 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A Polynomial Time Algorithm for Log-Concave Maximum Likelihood via Locally Exponential Families · NeurIPS 2019 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
first-order methods |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A Polynomial Time Algorithm for Log-Concave Maximum Likelihood via Locally Exponential Families · NeurIPS 2019 |
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs
FPGA implementation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Reducing FPGA algorithm area by avoiding redundant computation · ICRA 2015 |
Image and video processing › feature detection
corner detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Reducing FPGA algorithm area by avoiding redundant computation · ICRA 2015 |
Image and video processing
feature detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Reducing FPGA algorithm area by avoiding redundant computation · ICRA 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
skew-symmetric matrix · 0.9lie algebra · 0.9exponential family · 0.8approximate first-order method · 0.8redundant computation elimination · 0.4sample amplification · 0.4randomized algorithm · 0.4oracle complexity · 0.4linear regression · 0.4gaussian estimation · 0.4discrete distribution estimation · 0.4causal inference · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | LieRE: Lie Rotational Positional EncodingsabstractTransformer architectures rely on position encodings to model the spatial structure of input data. Rotary Position Encoding (RoPE) is a widely used method in language models that encodes relative positions through fixed, block-diagonal, rotation matrices applied to key-query interactions. We hypothesize that this inductive bias limits their RoPE’s effectiveness for modalities with high dimensional structure. Lie Relative Encodings (LieRE) introduce a principled generalization of RoPE, aimed at increasing the representational capacity of positional encodings in transformers. Instead of fixed 2D rotations, LieRE learns dense skew-symmetric matrices (Lie algebra elements), which are then differentiable mapped to form high-dimensional rotation matrices (Lie group elements). This results in richer, learnable, and continuous, encodings of both relative and absolute positional information. We demonstrate the effectiveness of LieRE on 2D and 3D vision tasks, showing that it generalizes well to higher input resolutions while maintaining computational efficiency. The code and checkpoints are publicly available at https://github.com/StanfordMIMI/LieRE. Sophie Ostmeier, Brian Axelrod, Maya Varma, Michael E. Moseley, Akshay Chaudhari, Curt Langlotz |
ICML | 2 |
| 2023 | USE-Evaluator: Performance metrics for medical image segmentation models supervised by uncertain, small or empty reference annotations in neuroimaging
Sophie Ostmeier, Brian Axelrod, Fabian Isensee, Jeroen Bertels, Michael Mlynash, Soren Christensen, Maarten G. Lansberg, Gregory W. Albers, Rajen Sheth, Benjamin F. J. Verhaaren, Abdelkader Mahammedi, Li-Jia Li 0001, Greg Zaharchuk, Jeremy J. Heit |
Medical Image Anal. | 2 |
| 2022 | Efficient Motion Planning Under Obstacle Uncertainty with Local Dependencies
Brian Axelrod, Luke Shimanuki |
WAFR | 1 |
| 2020 | Sample Amplification: Increasing Dataset Size even when Learning is ImpossibleabstractGiven data drawn from an unknown distribution, D, to what extent is it possible to “amplify” this dataset and faithfully output an even larger set of samples that appear to have been drawn from D? We formalize this question as follows: an (n,m) amplification procedure takes as input n independent draws from an unknown distribution D, and outputs a set of m > n “samples” which must be indistinguishable from m samples drawn iid from D. We consider this sample amplification problem in two fundamental settings: the case where D is an arbitrary discrete distribution supported on k elements, and the case where D is a d-dimensional Gaussian with unknown mean, and fixed covariance matrix. Perhaps surprisingly, we show a valid amplification procedure exists for both of these settings, even in the regime where the size of the input dataset, n, is significantly less than what would be necessary to learn distribution D to non-trivial accuracy. We also show that our procedures are optimal up to constant factors. Beyond these results, we describe potential applications of such data amplification, and formalize a number of curious directions for future research along this vein. Brian Axelrod, Shivam Garg 0001, Vatsal Sharan, Gregory Valiant |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | Causal Strategic Linear RegressionabstractIn many predictive decision-making scenarios, such as credit scoring and academic testing, a decision-maker must construct a model that accounts for agents’ propensity to “game” the decision rule by changing their features so as to receive better decisions. Whereas the strategic classification literature has previously assumed that agents’ outcomes are not causally affected by their features (and thus that strategic agents’ goal is deceiving the decision-maker), we join concurrent work in modeling agents’ outcomes as a function of their changeable attributes. As our main contribution, we provide efficient algorithms for learning decision rules that optimize three distinct decision-maker objectives in a realizable linear setting: accurately predicting agents’ post-gaming outcomes (prediction risk minimization), incentivizing agents to improve these outcomes (agent outcome maximization), and estimating the coefficients of the true underlying model (parameter estimation). Our algorithms circumvent a hardness result of Miller et al. (2019) by allowing the decision maker to test a sequence of decision rules and observe agents’ responses, in effect performing causal interventions through the decision rules. Yonadav Shavit, Benjamin L. Edelman, Brian Axelrod |
ICML | 3 |
| 2020 | Near-optimal Approximate Discrete and Continuous Submodular Function MinimizationabstractIn this paper we provide improved running times and oracle complexities for approximately minimizing a submodular function. Our main result is a randomized algorithm, which given any submodular function defined on n-elements with range [–1, 1], computes an ε-additive approximate minimizer in Õ(n/ε2) oracle evaluations with high probability. This improves over the Õ(n5/3/ε2) oracle evaluation algorithm of Chakrabarty et al. (STOC 2017) and the Õ(n3/2/ε2) oracle evaluation algorithm of Hamoudi et al… Further, we leverage a generalization of this result to obtain efficient algorithms for minimizing a broad class of nonconvex functions. For any function f with domain [0, 1]n that satisfies for all i ≠ j and is L-Lipschitz with respect to the L∞-norm we give an algorithm that computes an ε-additive approximate minimizer with Õ(n · poly(L/ε) function evaluation with high probability. Brian Axelrod, Yang P. Liu, Aaron Sidford |
SODA | 1 |
| 2019 | A Polynomial Time Algorithm for Log-Concave Maximum Likelihood via Locally Exponential FamiliesabstractWe consider the problem of computing the maximum likelihood multivariate log-concave distribution for a set of points. Specifically, we present an algorithm which, given $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^d$ and an accuracy parameter $\eps>0$, runs in time $\poly(n,d,1/\eps),$ and returns a log-concave distribution which, with high probability, has the property that the likelihood of the $n$ points under the returned distribution is at most an additive $\eps$ less than the maximum likelihood that could be achieved via any log-concave distribution. This is the first computationally efficient (polynomial time) algorithm for this fundamental and practically important task. Our algorithm rests on a novel connection with exponential families: the maximum likelihood log-concave distribution belongs to a class of structured distributions which, while not an exponential family, ``locally'' possesses key properties of exponential families. This connection then allows the problem of computing the log-concave maximum likelihood distribution to be formulated as a convex optimization problem, and solved via an approximate first-order method. Efficiently approximating the (sub) gradients of the objective function of this optimization problem is quite delicate, and is the main technical challenge in this work. Brian Axelrod, Ilias Diakonikolas, Alistair Stewart, Anastasios Sidiropoulos, Gregory Valiant |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2018 | Hardness of 3D Motion Planning Under Obstacle Uncertainty
Luke Shimanuki, Brian Axelrod |
WAFR | 2 |
| 2015 | Reducing FPGA algorithm area by avoiding redundant computationabstractWe develop a new paradigm for designing fully streaming, area-efficient FPGA implementations of common building blocks for vision algorithm. By focusing on avoiding redundant computation we achieve a reduction of one to two orders of magnitude reduction in design area utilization as compared to previous implementations. We demonstrate that our design works in practice by building five 325 frames per second, high resolution Harris corner detection cores onto a single FPGA. Brian Axelrod, Michel Laverne |
ICRA | 1 |