Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Max Pflueger
dblp:164/8317
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 70% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 30% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Multi-step planning for robotic manipulation · ICRA 2015 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
multi-step planning |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Multi-step planning for robotic manipulation · ICRA 2015 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
task and motion planning |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Multi-step planning for robotic manipulation · ICRA 2015 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
manipulation planning |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Multi-step planning for robotic manipulation · ICRA 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-step planning · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Multi-step planning for robotic manipulationabstractMost current systems capable of robotic object manipulation involve ad hoc assumptions about the order of operations necessary to achieve a task, and usually have no mechanism to predict how earlier decisions will affect the quality of the solution later. Solving this problem is sometimes referred to as combined task and motion planning. We propose that multi-step planning, a technique previously applied in some other domains, is an effective way to address the question of combined task and motion planning. We demonstrate the technique on a complex motion planning problem involving a two-armed robot (PR2) and an articulated object (folding chair) where our planner naturally discovers extra steps that are necessary to satisfy kinematic constraints of the problem. We also propose some further extensions to our algorithm that we believe will make it an extremely powerful technique in this domain. Max Pflueger, Gaurav S. Sukhatme |
ICRA | 1 |