Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Max Pflueger

dblp:164/8317 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 70% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.212015
Multi-step planning for robotic manipulation · ICRA 2015
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
multi-step planning
0.212015
Multi-step planning for robotic manipulation · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
task and motion planning
0.212015
Multi-step planning for robotic manipulation · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
manipulation planning
0.112015
Multi-step planning for robotic manipulation · ICRA 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-step planning · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Multi-step planning for robotic manipulation
abstract
Most current systems capable of robotic object manipulation involve ad hoc assumptions about the order of operations necessary to achieve a task, and usually have no mechanism to predict how earlier decisions will affect the quality of the solution later. Solving this problem is sometimes referred to as combined task and motion planning. We propose that multi-step planning, a technique previously applied in some other domains, is an effective way to address the question of combined task and motion planning. We demonstrate the technique on a complex motion planning problem involving a two-armed robot (PR2) and an articulated object (folding chair) where our planner naturally discovers extra steps that are necessary to satisfy kinematic constraints of the problem. We also propose some further extensions to our algorithm that we believe will make it an extremely powerful technique in this domain.
Max Pflueger, Gaurav S. Sukhatme
ICRA1