Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sujit Rajappa

dblp:164/8504 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 64% Legged, aerial and field robots · 22% Multi-agent systems · 14%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.522016
Adaptive Super Twisting Controller for a quadrotor UAV · ICRA 2016
Modeling, control and design optimization for a fully-actuated hexarotor aerial vehicle with tilted propellers · ICRA 2015
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › formation control
distributed formation control
0.312018
A Distributed Control Approach to Formation Balancing and Maneuvering of Multiple Multirotor UAVs · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control
0.312018
A Distributed Control Approach to Formation Balancing and Maneuvering of Multiple Multirotor UAVs · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
aerial robots
0.322016
Modeling, control and design optimization for a fully-actuated hexarotor aerial vehicle with tilted propellers · ICRA 2015
Adaptive Super Twisting Controller for a quadrotor UAV · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
sliding mode control
0.212016
Adaptive Super Twisting Controller for a quadrotor UAV · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › controller design
decoupled control
0.212015
Modeling, control and design optimization for a fully-actuated hexarotor aerial vehicle with tilted propellers · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › nonlinear control
feedback linearization
0.212015
Modeling, control and design optimization for a fully-actuated hexarotor aerial vehicle with tilted propellers · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robots › rotorcraft
multirotor
0.112018
A Distributed Control Approach to Formation Balancing and Maneuvering of Multiple Multirotor UAVs · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robots
quadrotor
0.112016
Adaptive Super Twisting Controller for a quadrotor UAV · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
trajectory tracking
0.112016
Adaptive Super Twisting Controller for a quadrotor UAV · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robots › aerial physical interaction
aerial manipulation
0.112015
Modeling, control and design optimization for a fully-actuated hexarotor aerial vehicle with tilted propellers · ICRA 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model predictive control · 0.3distributed control · 0.3super twisting control · 0.2gain adaptation · 0.2feedforward control · 0.2dynamic inversion · 0.2tilt angle optimization · 0.2input-output decoupling · 0.2feedback linearization · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 A Distributed Control Approach to Formation Balancing and Maneuvering of Multiple Multirotor UAVs
abstract
In this paper, we propose and experimentally verify a distributed formation control algorithm for a group of multirotor unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The algorithm brings the whole group of UAVs simultaneously to a prescribed submanifold that determines the formation shape in an asymptotically stable fashion in two- and three-dimensional environments. The complete distributed control framework is implemented with the combination of a fast model predictive control method executed at 50 Hz on low-power computers onboard multirotor UAVs and validated via a series of hardware-in-the-loop simulations and real-robot experiments. The experiments are configured to study the control performance in various formation cases of arbitrary time-varying (e.g., expanding, shrinking, or moving) shapes. In the actual experiments, up to four multirotors have been implemented to form arbitrary triangular, rectangular, and circular shapes drawn by the operator via a human-robot interaction device. We also carry out hardware-in-the-loop simulations using up to six onboard computers to achieve spherical formations and a formation moving through obstacles.
Yuyi Liu, Jan Maximilian Montenbruck, Daniel Zelazo, Marcin Odelga, Sujit Rajappa, Heinrich H. Bülthoff, Frank Allgöwer, Andreas Zell
IEEE Trans. Robotics5
2017 A control architecture for physical human-UAV interaction with a fully actuated hexarotor
abstract
Physical human-UAV interaction (PHUI) with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) has many possible applications, and a few recent works [1], [2] have shown that it is possible to perform PHUI with a standard quadrotor. However, the intrinsic underactuation of quadrotors may hinder the interaction task and also cause safety issues. In this paper, we present an admittance control-based scheme to perform PHUI with a fully actuated UAV. The system also benefits from the robustness provided by our fully actuated UAV implementation of the adaptive super twisting controller (ASTC). While validating our system in simulation, we also show the superior performance of the fully actuated UAV with respect to a standard quadcopter.
Sujit Rajappa, Heinrich H. Bülthoff, Marcin Odelga, Paolo Stegagno
IROS1
2016 Adaptive Super Twisting Controller for a quadrotor UAV
abstract
In this paper we present a robust quadrotor controller for tracking a reference trajectory in presence of uncertainties and disturbances. A Super Twisting controller is implemented using the recently proposed gain adaptation law [1], [2], which has the advantage of not requiring the knowledge of the upper bound of the lumped uncertainties. The controller design is based on the regular form of the quadrotor dynamics, without separation in two nested control loops for position and attitude. The controller is further extended by a feedforward dynamic inversion control that reduces the effort of the sliding mode controller. The higher order quadrotor dynamic model and proposed controller are validated using a SimMechanics physical simulation with initial error, parameter uncertainties, noisy measurements and external perturbations.
Sujit Rajappa, Carlo Masone, Heinrich H. Bülthoff, Paolo Stegagno
ICRA1
2015 Modeling, control and design optimization for a fully-actuated hexarotor aerial vehicle with tilted propellers
abstract
Mobility of a hexarotor UAV in its standard configuration is limited, since all the propeller force vectors are parallel and they achieve only 4-DoF actuation, similar, e.g., to quadrotors. As a consequence, the hexarotor pose cannot track an arbitrary trajectory while the center of mass is tracking a position trajectory. In this paper, we consider a different hexarotor architecture where propellers are tilted, without the need of any additional hardware. In this way, the hexarotor gains a 6-DoF actuation which allows to independently reach positions and orientations in free space and to be able to exert forces on the environment to resist any wrench for aerial manipulation tasks. After deriving the dynamical model of the proposed hexarotor, we discuss the controllability and the tilt angle optimization to reduce the control effort for the specific task. An exact feedback linearization and decoupling control law is proposed based on the input-output mapping, considering the Jacobian and task acceleration, for non-linear trajectory tracking. The capabilities of our approach are shown by simulation results.
Sujit Rajappa, Markus Ryll, Heinrich H. Bülthoff, Antonio Franchi
ICRA1