EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dennis Mund
dblp:164/8567
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 46% Image recognition and object detection · 23% Efficient and distributed learning · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › active learning
active learning for classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Active online confidence boosting for efficient object classification · ICRA 2015 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
object classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Active online confidence boosting for efficient object classification · ICRA 2015 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
overconfidence mitigation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Active online confidence boosting for efficient object classification · ICRA 2015 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty and calibration |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Active online confidence boosting for efficient object classification · ICRA 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
confidence weighting · 0.2boosting · 0.2active learning · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Active online confidence boosting for efficient object classificationabstractWe present a novel efficient algorithm for object classification. Our method is based on the active learning framework, in which training and classification are performed in loops, and new ground truth labels are queried from the supervisor in each loop. Our underlying classifier is from the family of boosting methods, but in contrast to earlier methods, our Confidence Boosting particularly focusses on misclassified samples that have a high classification confidence associated. We show that weighting these samples more than others leads to a decrease of overconfidence, for which we give a formal definition. As a result, our classifier is better suited for active learning, leading to steeper learning curves and less required label queries. We show the benefits of our approach on standard data sets from machine learning and robotics. Dennis Mund, Rudolph Triebel, Daniel Cremers |
ICRA | 1 |