Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andreas Bircher

dblp:164/8618 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0001-9822-6304ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 40% Reinforcement learning · 23% Robot navigation and mapping · 23%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration
0.212016
Receding horizon "next-best-view" planner for 3D exploration · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › view planning
next-best-view planning
0.212016
Receding horizon "next-best-view" planner for 3D exploration · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › mobile robot motion planning
inspection path planning
0.212015
Structural inspection path planning via iterative viewpoint resampling with application to aerial robotics · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.212015
Structural inspection path planning via iterative viewpoint resampling with application to aerial robotics · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
aerial robots
0.122016
Receding horizon "next-best-view" planner for 3D exploration · ICRA 2016
Structural inspection path planning via iterative viewpoint resampling with application to aerial robotics · ICRA 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

receding horizon planning · 0.2random trees · 0.2iterative viewpoint resampling · 0.2alternating optimization · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Receding horizon "next-best-view" planner for 3D exploration
abstract
This paper presents a novel path planning algorithm for the autonomous exploration of unknown space using aerial robotic platforms. The proposed planner employs a receding horizon “next-best-view” scheme: In an online computed random tree it finds the best branch, the quality of which is determined by the amount of unmapped space that can be explored. Only the first edge of this branch is executed at every planning step, while repetition of this procedure leads to complete exploration results. The proposed planner is capable of running online, onboard a robot with limited resources. Its high performance is evaluated in detailed simulation studies as well as in a challenging real world experiment using a rotorcraft micro aerial vehicle. Analysis on the computational complexity of the algorithm is provided and its good scaling properties enable the handling of large scale and complex problem setups.
Andreas Bircher, Mina Kamel 0001, Kostas Alexis, Helen Oleynikova, Roland Siegwart
ICRA1
2015 Structural inspection path planning via iterative viewpoint resampling with application to aerial robotics
abstract
Within this paper, a new fast algorithm that provides efficient solutions to the problem of inspection path planning for complex 3D structures is presented. The algorithm assumes a triangular mesh representation of the structure and employs an alternating two-step optimization paradigm to find good viewpoints that together provide full coverage and a connecting path that has low cost. In every iteration, the viewpoints are chosen such that the connection cost is reduced and, subsequently, the tour is optimized. Vehicle and sensor limitations are respected within both steps. Sample implementations are provided for rotorcraft and fixed-wing unmanned aerial systems. The resulting algorithm characteristics are evaluated using simulation studies as well as multiple real-world experimental test-cases with both vehicle types.
Andreas Bircher, Kostas Alexis, Michael Burri, Philipp Oettershagen, Sammy Omari, Thomas Mantel, Roland Siegwart
ICRA1