EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Annette Haworth
dblp:165/0067
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0003-1382-7747ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Visualization and visual analytics › human-in-the-loop
interactive optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Understanding the Relationship Between Interactive Optimisation and Visual Analytics in the Context of Prostate Brachytherapy · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2018 |
Visualization and visual analytics › visual analytics
visual analytics for healthcare |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Understanding the Relationship Between Interactive Optimisation and Visual Analytics in the Context of Prostate Brachytherapy · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2018 |
Visualization and visual analytics › visual analytics
visual analytics for optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Understanding the Relationship Between Interactive Optimisation and Visual Analytics in the Context of Prostate Brachytherapy · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2018 |
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Understanding the Relationship Between Interactive Optimisation and Visual Analytics in the Context of Prostate Brachytherapy · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
semi-structured interviews · 0.7interactive optimization · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Understanding the Relationship Between Interactive Optimisation and Visual Analytics in the Context of Prostate BrachytherapyabstractThe fields of operations research and computer science have long sought to find automatic solver techniques that can find high-quality solutions to difficult real-world optimisation problems. The traditional workflow is to exactly model the problem and then enter this model into a general-purpose "black-box" solver. In practice, however, many problems cannot be solved completely automatically, but require a "human-in-the-loop" to iteratively refine the model and give hints to the solver. In this paper, we explore the parallels between this interactive optimisation workflow and the visual analytics sense-making loop. We assert that interactive optimisation is essentially a visual analytics task and propose a problem-solving loop analogous to the sense-making loop. We explore these ideas through an in-depth analysis of a use-case in prostate brachytherapy, an application where interactive optimisation may be able to provide significant assistance to practitioners in creating prostate cancer treatment plans customised to each patient's tumour characteristics. However, current brachytherapy treatment planning is usually a careful, mostly manual process involving multiple professionals. We developed a prototype interactive optimisation tool for brachytherapy that goes beyond current practice in supporting focal therapy - targeting tumour cells directly rather than simply seeking coverage of the whole prostate gland. We conducted semi-structured interviews, in two stages, with seven radiation oncology professionals in order to establish whether they would prefer to use interactive optimisation for treatment planning and whether such a tool could improve their trust in the novel focal therapy approach and in machine generated solutions to the problem. Jie Liu 0046, Tim Dwyer, Kim Marriott, Jeremy Millar, Annette Haworth |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 5 |
| 2017 | Automatic 3D modelling for prostate cancer brachytherapyabstract3D visualisation is being used increasingly to improve the accuracy of biopsies and seed placement for prostate cancer brachytherapy (the implantation of small radioactive ‘seeds’ for radiotherapy). The construction of a 3D model requires the segmentation of 2D Magnetic Resonance (MR) images, which remains a challenging problem. The current practice of manual segmentation requires a very high level of expertise and is time-consuming. In this paper, we propose a new method for creating a 3D model of the prostate from MR images obtained pre-operatively. To do this, an Active Appearance Model (AAM) is created from the image data by grouping the MR images based on the region of the prostate each is taken from. A fast optimisation algorithm is then used to segment a new prostate using the AAM. Our results show that this method is fast and accurate compared with manual segmentation enabling this method to be used intra-operatively. Mohammad Ali Jan Ghasab, Andrew P. Paplinski, John M. Betts, Hayley M. Reynolds, Annette Haworth |
ICIP | 5 |