Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

G. C. Kessler

dblp:165/0598 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1988
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Internet architecture and protocols · 56% Routing and switching · 44%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet architecture and protocols
protocol standardization		 0.011988
A comparison between CCITT Recommendation X.25 and international standards 8208 and 7776 · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1988
Routing and switching › packet switching
x.25 protocol		 0.011988
A comparison between CCITT Recommendation X.25 and international standards 8208 and 7776 · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1988

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

protocol comparison · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1988 A comparison between CCITT Recommendation X.25 and international standards 8208 and 7776
abstract
CCITT Recommendation X.25 defines the interface between data terminal equipment (DTE) and data circuit-terminating equipment (DCE) operating in packet mode over a dedicated circuit. As such, X.25 views the interface from the perspective of the DCE and is written specifically for a DTE/DCE interface between host and network. ISO (International Organization for Standardization) standards 7776 and 8208 are the ISO versions of the X.25 link and packet levels, respectively, but have a wider scope than X.25 in also describing a DTE/DTE interface. Furthermore, ISO 8208 provides guidelines for connecting a private data network to a public data network using X.25 procedures. An overview of the technical difference between X.25 and the two ISO standards is presented.>
G. C. Kessler
 IEEE Trans. Commun.1