Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ariel Anders

dblp:165/1282 · also Ariel S. Anders · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot manipulation · 39% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 30% Motion planning and robot control · 30%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › motion planning under uncertainty
belief space planning
0.312018
Reliably Arranging Objects in Uncertain Domains · ICRA 2018
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › nondeterministic planning
conformant planning
0.312018
Reliably Arranging Objects in Uncertain Domains · ICRA 2018
Robotics › Robot manipulation
object rearrangement
0.312018
Reliably Arranging Objects in Uncertain Domains · ICRA 2018
Computing education
AI education
0.312018
Model AI Assignments 2018 · AAAI 2018
Robotics › Robot manipulation › nonprehensile manipulation
pushing manipulation
0.112018
Reliably Arranging Objects in Uncertain Domains · ICRA 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

supervised learning · 0.3physics simulation · 0.3belief-state transition model · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Model AI Assignments 2018
Todd W. Neller, Zack J. Butler, Nate Derbinsky, Heidi Furey, Fred G. Martin, Michael Guerzhoy, Ariel Anders, Joshua Eckroth
AAAI7
2018 Reliably Arranging Objects in Uncertain Domains
abstract
A crucial challenge in robotics is achieving reliable results in spite of sensing and control uncertainty. In this work, we explore the conformant planning approach to robot manipulation. In particular, we tackle the problem of pushing multiple planar objects simultaneously to achieve a specified arrangement without external sensing. Conformant planning is a belief-state planning problem. A belief state is the set of all possible states of the world, and the goal is to find a sequence of actions that will bring an initial belief state to a goal belief state. To do forward belief-state planning, we created a deterministic belief-state transition model from supervised learning based on off-line physics simulations. We compare our method with an on-line physics-based manipulation approach and show significantly reduced planning times and increased robustness in simulated experiments. Finally, we demonstrate the success of this approach in simulations and physical robot experiments.
Ariel Anders, Leslie Pack Kaelbling, Tomás Lozano-Pérez
ICRA1
2017 Model AI Assignments 2017
Todd W. Neller, Joshua Eckroth, Sravana Reddy, Joshua Ziegler, Jason M. Bindewald, Gilbert L. Peterson, Thomas P. Way, Paula Matuszek, Lillian N. Cassel, Mary-Angela Papalaskari, Carol Weiss, Ariel Anders, Sertac Karaman
AAAI12