Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andreas Doerr
dblp:165/1310
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 30% Reinforcement learning · 26% Motion planning and robot control · 12% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Meta-Learning Acquisition Functions for Transfer Learning in Bayesian Optimization · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Meta-Learning Acquisition Functions for Transfer Learning in Bayesian Optimization · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization › policy gradient
deterministic policy gradient |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Trajectory-Based Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Trajectory-Based Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Trajectory-Based Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference › stochastic variational inference
doubly stochastic variational inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Probabilistic Recurrent State-Space Models · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learning Gaussian Processes by Minimizing PAC-Bayesian Generalization Bounds · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Probabilistic Recurrent State-Space Models · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › PAC-Bayesian analysis
PAC-Bayesian generalization bound |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learning Gaussian Processes by Minimizing PAC-Bayesian Generalization Bounds · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
state space model |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Probabilistic Recurrent State-Space Models · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Probabilistic Recurrent State-Space Models · ICML 2018 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › learning control
model-based policy search |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Model-based policy search for automatic tuning of multivariate PID controllers · ICRA 2017 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Model-based policy search for automatic tuning of multivariate PID controllers · ICRA 2017 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
continuous control |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Trajectory-Based Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process › sparse gaussian process
sparse gaussian process regression |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Learning Gaussian Processes by Minimizing PAC-Bayesian Generalization Bounds · NeurIPS 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
acquisition function learning · 0.4stochastic gradient hamiltonian monte carlo · 0.4stochastic gradient descent · 0.4importance sampling · 0.4recurrent neural network · 0.3gaussian process · 0.3doubly stochastic variational inference · 0.3PAC-Bayesian bound optimization · 0.3optimal control · 0.3PILCO · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Meta-Learning Acquisition Functions for Transfer Learning in Bayesian Optimization
Michael Volpp, Lukas P. Fröhlich, Kirsten Fischer, Andreas Doerr, Stefan Falkner, Frank Hutter, Christian Daniel |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2019 | Trajectory-Based Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement LearningabstractPolicy gradient methods are powerful reinforcement learning algorithms and have been demonstrated to solve many complex tasks. However, these methods are also data-inefficient, afflicted with high variance gradient estimates, and frequently get stuck in local optima. This work addresses these weaknesses by combining recent improvements in the reuse of off-policy data and exploration in parameter space with deterministic behavioral policies. The resulting objective is amenable to standard neural network optimization strategies like stochastic gradient descent or stochastic gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. Incorporation of previous rollouts via importance sampling greatly improves data-efficiency, whilst stochastic optimization schemes facilitate the escape from local optima. We evaluate the proposed approach on a series of continuous control benchmark tasks. The results show that the proposed algorithm is able to successfully and reliably learn solutions using fewer system interactions than standard policy gradient methods. Andreas Doerr, Michael Volpp, Marc Toussaint, Sebastian Trimpe, Christian Daniel |
ICML | 1 |
| 2018 | Probabilistic Recurrent State-Space ModelsabstractState-space models (SSMs) are a highly expressive model class for learning patterns in time series data and for system identification. Deterministic versions of SSMs (e.g., LSTMs) proved extremely successful in modeling complex time series data. Fully probabilistic SSMs, however, are often found hard to train, even for smaller problems. We propose a novel model formulation and a scalable training algorithm based on doubly stochastic variational inference and Gaussian processes. This combination allows efficient incorporation of latent state temporal correlations, which we found to be key to robust training. The effectiveness of the proposed PR-SSM is evaluated on a set of real-world benchmark datasets in comparison to state-of-the-art probabilistic model learning methods. Scalability and robustness are demonstrated on a high dimensional problem. Andreas Doerr, Christian Daniel, Martin Schiegg, Duy Nguyen-Tuong, Stefan Schaal, Marc Toussaint, Sebastian Trimpe |
ICML | 1 |
| 2018 | Learning Gaussian Processes by Minimizing PAC-Bayesian Generalization BoundsabstractGaussian Processes (GPs) are a generic modelling tool for supervised learning. While they have been successfully applied on large datasets, their use in safety-critical applications is hindered by the lack of good performance guarantees. To this end, we propose a method to learn GPs and their sparse approximations by directly optimizing a PAC-Bayesian bound on their generalization performance, instead of maximizing the marginal likelihood. Besides its theoretical appeal, we find in our evaluation that our learning method is robust and yields significantly better generalization guarantees than other common GP approaches on several regression benchmark datasets. David Reeb, Andreas Doerr, Sebastian Gerwinn, Barbara Rakitsch |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2017 | Model-based policy search for automatic tuning of multivariate PID controllersabstractPID control architectures are widely used in industrial applications. Despite their low number of open parameters, tuning multiple, coupled PID controllers can become tedious in practice. In this paper, we extend PILCO, a model-based policy search framework, to automatically tune multivariate PID controllers purely based on data observed on an otherwise unknown system. The system's state is extended appropriately to frame the PID policy as a static state feedback policy. This renders PID tuning possible as the solution of a finite horizon optimal control problem without further a priori knowledge. The framework is applied to the task of balancing an inverted pendulum on a seven degree-of-freedom robotic arm, thereby demonstrating its capabilities of fast and data-efficient policy learning, even on complex real world problems. Andreas Doerr, Duy Nguyen-Tuong, Alonso Marco, Stefan Schaal, Sebastian Trimpe |
ICRA | 1 |