Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andreas Doerr

dblp:165/1310 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 30% Reinforcement learning · 26% Motion planning and robot control · 12%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
0.412020
Meta-Learning Acquisition Functions for Transfer Learning in Bayesian Optimization · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning
0.412020
Meta-Learning Acquisition Functions for Transfer Learning in Bayesian Optimization · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization › policy gradient
deterministic policy gradient
0.412019
Trajectory-Based Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy reinforcement learning
0.412019
Trajectory-Based Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient
0.412019
Trajectory-Based Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference › stochastic variational inference
doubly stochastic variational inference
0.312018
Probabilistic Recurrent State-Space Models · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process
0.312018
Learning Gaussian Processes by Minimizing PAC-Bayesian Generalization Bounds · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
0.312018
Probabilistic Recurrent State-Space Models · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Learning theory › PAC-Bayesian analysis
PAC-Bayesian generalization bound
0.312018
Learning Gaussian Processes by Minimizing PAC-Bayesian Generalization Bounds · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
state space model
0.312018
Probabilistic Recurrent State-Space Models · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
0.312018
Probabilistic Recurrent State-Space Models · ICML 2018
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › learning control
model-based policy search
0.312017
Model-based policy search for automatic tuning of multivariate PID controllers · ICRA 2017
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.312017
Model-based policy search for automatic tuning of multivariate PID controllers · ICRA 2017
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
continuous control
0.112019
Trajectory-Based Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process › sparse gaussian process
sparse gaussian process regression
0.112018
Learning Gaussian Processes by Minimizing PAC-Bayesian Generalization Bounds · NeurIPS 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

acquisition function learning · 0.4stochastic gradient hamiltonian monte carlo · 0.4stochastic gradient descent · 0.4importance sampling · 0.4recurrent neural network · 0.3gaussian process · 0.3doubly stochastic variational inference · 0.3PAC-Bayesian bound optimization · 0.3optimal control · 0.3PILCO · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Meta-Learning Acquisition Functions for Transfer Learning in Bayesian Optimization
Michael Volpp, Lukas P. Fröhlich, Kirsten Fischer, Andreas Doerr, Stefan Falkner, Frank Hutter, Christian Daniel
ICLR4
2019 Trajectory-Based Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Policy gradient methods are powerful reinforcement learning algorithms and have been demonstrated to solve many complex tasks. However, these methods are also data-inefficient, afflicted with high variance gradient estimates, and frequently get stuck in local optima. This work addresses these weaknesses by combining recent improvements in the reuse of off-policy data and exploration in parameter space with deterministic behavioral policies. The resulting objective is amenable to standard neural network optimization strategies like stochastic gradient descent or stochastic gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. Incorporation of previous rollouts via importance sampling greatly improves data-efficiency, whilst stochastic optimization schemes facilitate the escape from local optima. We evaluate the proposed approach on a series of continuous control benchmark tasks. The results show that the proposed algorithm is able to successfully and reliably learn solutions using fewer system interactions than standard policy gradient methods.
Andreas Doerr, Michael Volpp, Marc Toussaint, Sebastian Trimpe, Christian Daniel
ICML1
2018 Probabilistic Recurrent State-Space Models
abstract
State-space models (SSMs) are a highly expressive model class for learning patterns in time series data and for system identification. Deterministic versions of SSMs (e.g., LSTMs) proved extremely successful in modeling complex time series data. Fully probabilistic SSMs, however, are often found hard to train, even for smaller problems. We propose a novel model formulation and a scalable training algorithm based on doubly stochastic variational inference and Gaussian processes. This combination allows efficient incorporation of latent state temporal correlations, which we found to be key to robust training. The effectiveness of the proposed PR-SSM is evaluated on a set of real-world benchmark datasets in comparison to state-of-the-art probabilistic model learning methods. Scalability and robustness are demonstrated on a high dimensional problem.
Andreas Doerr, Christian Daniel, Martin Schiegg, Duy Nguyen-Tuong, Stefan Schaal, Marc Toussaint, Sebastian Trimpe
ICML1
2018 Learning Gaussian Processes by Minimizing PAC-Bayesian Generalization Bounds
abstract
Gaussian Processes (GPs) are a generic modelling tool for supervised learning. While they have been successfully applied on large datasets, their use in safety-critical applications is hindered by the lack of good performance guarantees. To this end, we propose a method to learn GPs and their sparse approximations by directly optimizing a PAC-Bayesian bound on their generalization performance, instead of maximizing the marginal likelihood. Besides its theoretical appeal, we find in our evaluation that our learning method is robust and yields significantly better generalization guarantees than other common GP approaches on several regression benchmark datasets.
David Reeb, Andreas Doerr, Sebastian Gerwinn, Barbara Rakitsch
NeurIPS2
2017 Model-based policy search for automatic tuning of multivariate PID controllers
abstract
PID control architectures are widely used in industrial applications. Despite their low number of open parameters, tuning multiple, coupled PID controllers can become tedious in practice. In this paper, we extend PILCO, a model-based policy search framework, to automatically tune multivariate PID controllers purely based on data observed on an otherwise unknown system. The system's state is extended appropriately to frame the PID policy as a static state feedback policy. This renders PID tuning possible as the solution of a finite horizon optimal control problem without further a priori knowledge. The framework is applied to the task of balancing an inverted pendulum on a seven degree-of-freedom robotic arm, thereby demonstrating its capabilities of fast and data-efficient policy learning, even on complex real world problems.
Andreas Doerr, Duy Nguyen-Tuong, Alonso Marco, Stefan Schaal, Sebastian Trimpe
ICRA1