Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Melanie Dohmen
dblp:165/7068 · also Melanie Kleiner
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-4447-0579ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 67% Segmentation and scene understanding · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | How Shift Equivariance Impacts Metric Learning for Instance Segmentation · ICCV 2021 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
instance segmentation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | How Shift Equivariance Impacts Metric Learning for Instance Segmentation · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › equivariant neural network
shift equivariance |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | How Shift Equivariance Impacts Metric Learning for Instance Segmentation · ICCV 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
formal analysis · 0.5encoder-decoder network · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | How Shift Equivariance Impacts Metric Learning for Instance SegmentationabstractMetric learning has received conflicting assessments concerning its suitability for solving instance segmentation tasks. It has been dismissed as theoretically flawed due to the shift equivariance of the employed CNNs and their respective inability to distinguish same-looking objects. Yet it has been shown to yield state of the art results for a variety of tasks, and practical issues have mainly been reported in the context of tile-and-stitch approaches, where discontinuities at tile boundaries have been observed. To date, neither of the reported issues have undergone thorough formal analysis. In our work, we contribute a comprehensive formal analysis of the shift equivariance properties of encoder-decoder-style CNNs, which yields a clear picture of what can and cannot be achieved with metric learning in the face of same-looking objects. In particular, we prove that a standard encoder-decoder network that takes d-dimensional images as input, with l pooling layers and pooling factor f, has the capacity to distinguish at most fdlsame-looking objects, and we show that this upper limit can be reached. Furthermore, we show that to avoid discontinuities in a tile-and-stitch approach, assuming standard batch size 1, it is necessary to employ valid convolutions in combination with a training output window size strictly greater than fl, while at test-time it is necessary to crop tiles to size n • flbefore stitching, with n ≥ 1. We complement these theoretical findings by discussing a number of insightful special cases for which we show empirical results on synthetic and real data.Code:https://github.com/Kainmueller-Lab/shift_equivariance_unet Josef Lorenz Rumberger, Peter Hirsch 0001, Melanie Dohmen, Vanessa Emanuela Guarino, Ashkan Mokarian, Lisa Mais, Jan Funke, Dagmar Kainmüller |
ICCV | 4 |
| 2012 | Classification of Ambiguous Nerve Fiber Orientations in 3D Polarized Light Imaging
Melanie Dohmen, Markus Axer, David Gräßel, Julia Reckfort, Uwe Pietrzyk, Katrin Amunts, Timo Dickscheid |
MICCAI (1) | 1 |