Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Negar Hassanpour

dblp:165/8146 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-5211-4152ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 4 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 36% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 25% Generative modeling · 24%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visual content generation and editing · 100%

Topics — the 16 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
1.722025
Qua2SeDiMo: Quantifiable Quantization Sensitivity of Diffusion Models · AAAI 2025
PixelMan: Consistent Object Editing with Diffusion Models via Pixel Manipulation and Generation · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
1.522025
Qua2SeDiMo: Quantifiable Quantization Sensitivity of Diffusion Models · AAAI 2025
AutoGO: Automated Computation Graph Optimization for Neural Network Evolution · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference
1.232020
Learning Disentangled Representations for CounterFactual Regression · ICLR 2020
CounterFactual Regression with Importance Sampling Weights · IJCAI 2019
Counterfactual Reasoning in Observational Studies · AAAI 2019
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › diffusion model acceleration
diffusion model quantization
0.912025
Qua2SeDiMo: Quantifiable Quantization Sensitivity of Diffusion Models · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › quantization
post-training quantization
0.912025
Qua2SeDiMo: Quantifiable Quantization Sensitivity of Diffusion Models · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
quantization
0.912025
Qua2SeDiMo: Quantifiable Quantization Sensitivity of Diffusion Models · AAAI 2025
Visual content generation and editing
image editing
0.912025
PixelMan: Consistent Object Editing with Diffusion Models via Pixel Manipulation and Generation · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › counterfactual prediction
counterfactual regression
0.822020
Learning Disentangled Representations for CounterFactual Regression · ICLR 2020
CounterFactual Regression with Importance Sampling Weights · IJCAI 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal effect estimation › treatment effect estimation
individual treatment effect estimation
0.822019
CounterFactual Regression with Importance Sampling Weights · IJCAI 2019
Counterfactual Reasoning in Observational Studies · AAAI 2019
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › deep learning systems
computation graph optimization
0.712023
AutoGO: Automated Computation Graph Optimization for Neural Network Evolution · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search
0.712023
AutoGO: Automated Computation Graph Optimization for Neural Network Evolution · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
disentangled representation learning
0.412020
Learning Disentangled Representations for CounterFactual Regression · ICLR 2020
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › causal reasoning
counterfactual reasoning
0.412019
Counterfactual Reasoning in Observational Studies · AAAI 2019
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift
0.112019
CounterFactual Regression with Importance Sampling Weights · IJCAI 2019
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › dataset bias
selection bias
0.112019
CounterFactual Regression with Importance Sampling Weights · IJCAI 2019
Medical and health informatics
precision medicine
0.112019
Counterfactual Reasoning in Observational Studies · AAAI 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pixel manipulation · 1.7inversion-free sampling · 1.7diffusion model · 1.7post-training quantization · 0.9mixed-precision quantization · 0.9performance predictor · 0.7frequent segment mining · 0.7evolutionary search · 0.7disentangled representation learning · 0.4counterfactual regression · 0.4counterfactual reasoning · 0.4causal effect estimation · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 PixelMan: Consistent Object Editing with Diffusion Models via Pixel Manipulation and Generation
abstract
Recent research explores the potential of Diffusion Models (DMs) for consistent object editing, which aims to modify object position, size, and composition, etc., while preserving the consistency of objects and background without changing their texture and attributes. Current inference-time methods often rely on DDIM inversion, which inherently compromises efficiency and the achievable consistency of edited images. Recent methods also utilize energy guidance which iteratively updates the predicted noise and can drive the latents away from the original image, resulting in distortions. In this paper, we propose PixelMan, an inversion-free and training-free method for achieving consistent object editing via Pixel Manipulation and generation, where we directly create a duplicate copy of the source object at target location in the pixel space, and introduce an efficient sampling approach to iteratively harmonize the manipulated object into the target location and inpaint its original location, while ensuring image consistency by anchoring the edited image to be generated to the pixel-manipulated image as well as by introducing various consistency-preserving optimization techniques during inference. Experimental evaluations based on benchmark datasets as well as extensive visual comparisons show that in as few as 16 inference steps, PixelMan outperforms a range of state-of-the-art training-based and training-free methods (usually requiring 50 steps) on multiple consistent object editing tasks.
Liyao Jiang, Negar Hassanpour, Mohammad Salameh, Mohammadreza Samadi, Jiao He, Fengyu Sun, Di Niu 0002
AAAI2
2025 Qua2SeDiMo: Quantifiable Quantization Sensitivity of Diffusion Models
abstract
Diffusion Models (DM) have democratized AI image generation through an iterative denoising process. Quantization is a major technique to alleviate the inference cost and reduce the size of DM denoiser networks. However, as denoisers evolve from variants of convolutional U-Nets toward newer Transformer architectures, it is of growing importance to understand the quantization sensitivity of different weight layers, operations and architecture types to performance. In this work, we address this challenge with Qua2SeDiMo, a mixed-precision Post-Training Quantization framework that generates explainable insights on the cost-effectiveness of various model weight quantization methods for different denoiser operation types and block structures. We leverage these insights to make high-quality mixed-precision quantization decisions for a myriad of diffusion models ranging from foundational U-Nets to state-of-the-art Transformers. As a result, Qua2SeDiMo can construct 3.4-bit, 3.9-bit, 3.65-bit and 3.7-bit weight quantization on PixArt-α, PixArt-Σ, Hunyuan-DiT and SDXL, respectively. We further pair our weight-quantization configurations with 6-bit activation quantization and outperform existing approaches in terms of quantitative metrics and generative image quality.
Keith G. Mills, Mohammad Salameh, Ruichen Chen, Negar Hassanpour, Wei Lu 0023, Di Niu 0002
AAAI4
2023 AutoGO: Automated Computation Graph Optimization for Neural Network Evolution
abstract
Optimizing Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) to obtain high-quality models for efficient real-world deployment has posed multi-faceted challenges to machine learning engineers. Existing methods either search for neural architectures in heuristic design spaces or apply low-level adjustments to computation primitives to improve inference efficiency on hardware. We present Automated Graph Optimization (AutoGO), a framework to evolve neural networks in a low-level Computation Graph (CG) of primitive operations to improve both its performance and hardware friendliness. Through a tokenization scheme, AutoGO performs variable-sized segment mutations, making both primitive changes and larger-grained changes to CGs. We introduce our segmentation and mutation algorithms, efficient frequent segment mining technique, as well as a pretrained context-aware predictor to estimate the impact of segment replacements. Extensive experimental results show that AutoGO can automatically evolve several typical large convolutional networks to achieve significant task performance improvement and FLOPs reduction on a range of CV tasks, ranging from Classification, Semantic Segmentation, Human Pose Estimation, to Super Resolution, yet without introducing any newer primitive operations. We also demonstrate the lightweight deployment results of AutoGO-optimized super-resolution and denoising U-Nets on a cycle simulator for a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), achieving PSNR improvement and latency/power reduction simultaneously. Code available at https://github.com/Ascend-Research/AutoGO.
Mohammad Salameh, Keith G. Mills, Negar Hassanpour, Fred X. Han, Wei Lu 0023, Shangling Jui, Chunhua Zhou, Fengyu Sun, Di Niu 0002
NeurIPS3
2020 Learning Disentangled Representations for CounterFactual Regression
Negar Hassanpour, Russell Greiner
ICLR1
2019 Counterfactual Reasoning in Observational Studies
abstract
To identify the appropriate action to take, an intelligent agent must infer the causal effects of every possible action choices. A prominent example is precision medicine that attempts to identify which medical procedure will benefit each individual patient the most. This requires answering counterfactual questions such as: ""Would this patient have lived longer, had she received an alternative treatment?"". In my PhD, I attempt to explore ways to address the challenges associated with causal effect estimation; with a focus on devising methods that enhance performance according to the individual-based measures (as opposed to population-based measures).
Negar Hassanpour
AAAI1
2019 CounterFactual Regression with Importance Sampling Weights
abstract
Perhaps the most pressing concern of a patient diagnosed with cancer is her life expectancy under various treatment options. For a binary-treatment case, this translates into estimating the difference between the outcomes (e.g., survival time) of the two available treatment options – i.e., her Individual Treatment Effect (ITE). This is especially challenging to estimate from observational data, as that data has selection bias: the treatment assigned to a patient depends on that patient's attributes. In this work, we borrow ideas from domain adaptation to address the distributional shift between the source (outcome of the administered treatment, appearing in the observed training data) and target (outcome of the alternative treatment) that exists due to selection bias. We propose a context-aware importance sampling re-weighing scheme, built on top of a representation learning module, for estimating ITEs. Empirical results on two publicly available benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed method significantly outperforms state-of-the-art.
Negar Hassanpour, Russell Greiner
IJCAI1
2017 A Quantum Probability Inspired Framework for Image-Set Based Face Identification
abstract
Face image-sets, each containing images belonging to the same subject, offer an abundance of information, which if properly aggregated would significantly outperform the classical methods based on single-shot face images. However, there must be a principled way to deal with uncertainties on how well each face image represents the subject. Uncertainties are imposed by various sources such as low resolution, occlusion, and face tracking failure among different face images. It is suggested that the mathematical foundations of quantum theory would construct a sound knowledge representation system. We propose a Quantum Probability Inspired Framework (QPIF) for image-set based face identification that enables dealing with such uncertainties by utilizing the notion of simultaneous decidability in quantum formalism. Information extracted from face images of known subjects form subspaces in a Hilbert space. When presented with a new face image-set, an ensemble of uncertain states is generated from the face image-set. Recognition is posed as an optimization problem to find the bestranked subspace to which the ensemble of states corresponds. Assessment of the proposed method on two publicly available databases demonstrates significantly better results compared to the state-of-the-art.
Negar Hassanpour, Liang Chen 0012
FG1
2017 Survey: How good are the current advances in image set based face identification? - Experiments on three popular benchmarks with a naïve approach
Liang Chen 0012, Negar Hassanpour
Comput. Vis. Image Underst.2