Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sven Jager

dblp:165/8695 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-1410-9114ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 6 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 80% Medical and health informatics · 20%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction
0.912025
Active Learning for Protein Structure Prediction · RECOMB 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery
computational drug discovery
0.812024
Representations of lipid nanoparticles using large language models for transfection efficiency prediction · Bioinform. 2024
Medical and health informatics
drug delivery
0.812024
Representations of lipid nanoparticles using large language models for transfection efficiency prediction · Bioinform. 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein function prediction
0.712023
Surface ID: a geometry-aware system for protein molecular surface comparison · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology
structural bioinformatics
0.712023
Surface ID: a geometry-aware system for protein molecular surface comparison · Bioinform. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

active learning · 0.9large language model embeddings · 0.8gradient boosting · 0.8surface alignment · 0.7geometric deep learning · 0.7clustering · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 WearAble AI: AI Assistant for Wearable Data Analysis and Visualization
Arash Atrsaei, Haneen Njoum, Albert Pla, Sven Jager
AIME (2)4
2025 Active Learning for Protein Structure Prediction
Zexin Xue, Michael Bailey, Ruijiang Li, Alejandro Corrochano-Navarro, Sizhen Li, Lorenzo Kogler-Anele, Qui Yu, Ziv Bar-Joseph, Sven Jager
RECOMB10
2024 Representations of lipid nanoparticles using large language models for transfection efficiency prediction
abstract
MOTIVATION: Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are the most widely used vehicles for mRNA vaccine delivery. The structure of the lipids composing the LNPs can have a major impact on the effectiveness of the mRNA payload. Several properties should be optimized to improve delivery and expression including biodegradability, synthetic accessibility, and transfection efficiency. RESULTS: To optimize LNPs, we developed and tested models that enable the virtual screening of LNPs with high transfection efficiency. Our best method uses the lipid Simplified Molecular-Input Line-Entry System (SMILES) as inputs to a large language model. Large language model-generated embeddings are then used by a downstream gradient-boosting classifier. As we show, our method can more accurately predict lipid properties, which could lead to higher efficiency and reduced experimental time and costs. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code and data links available at: https://github.com/Sanofi-Public/LipoBART.
Saeed Moayedpour, Jonathan Broadbent, Saleh Riahi, Michael Bailey, Hoa V. Thu, Dimitar A. Dobchev, Akshay Balsubramani, Ricardo N. D. Santos, Lorenzo Kogler-Anele, Alejandro Corrochano-Navarro, Sizhen Li, Fernando U. Montoya, Vikram Agarwal, Ziv Bar-Joseph, Sven Jager
Bioinform.15
2023 Surface ID: a geometry-aware system for protein molecular surface comparison
abstract
MOTIVATION: A protein can be represented in several forms, including its 1D sequence, 3D atom coordinates, and molecular surface. A protein surface contains rich structural and chemical features directly related to the protein's function such as its ability to interact with other molecules. While many methods have been developed for comparing the similarity of proteins using the sequence and structural representations, computational methods based on molecular surface representation are limited. RESULTS: Here, we describe "Surface ID," a geometric deep learning system for high-throughput surface comparison based on geometric and chemical features. Surface ID offers a novel grouping and alignment algorithm useful for clustering proteins by function, visualization, and in silico screening of potential binding partners to a target molecule. Our method demonstrates top performance in surface similarity assessment, indicating great potential for protein functional annotation, a major need in protein engineering and therapeutic design. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code for the Surface ID model, trained weights, and inference script are available at https://github.com/Sanofi-Public/LMR-SurfaceID.
Saleh Riahi, Jae Hyeon Lee, Taylor Sorenson, Shuai Wei, Sven Jager, Reza Olfati-Saber, Yanfeng Zhou, Anna Park, Maria Wendt, Hervé Minoux
Bioinform.5
2020 SICOR: Subgraph Isomorphism Comparison of RNA Secondary Structures
abstract
RNA aptamer selection during SELEX experiments builds on secondary structural diversity. Advanced structural comparison methods can focus this diversity. We develop SICOR, which uses probabilistic subgraph isomorphisms for graph distances between RNA secondary structure graphs. SICOR outperforms other comparison methods and is applicable to many structural comparisons in experimental design.
Michael Schmidt 0013, Kay Hamacher, Felix Reinhardt, Thea S. Lotz, Florian Groher, Beatrix Suess, Sven Jager
IEEE ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform.7
2016 StreAM- T_g : Algorithms for Analyzing Coarse Grained RNA Dynamics Based on Markov Models of Connectivity-Graphs
Sven Jager, Benjamin Schiller, Thorsten Strufe, Kay Hamacher
WABI1