Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tengxiao Liu

dblp:165/9039 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Language models and text generation · 59% Efficient and distributed learning · 18% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 8%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning
1.422024
Can Language Models Learn to Skip Steps? · NeurIPS 2024
Plan, Verify and Switch: Integrated Reasoning with Diverse X-of-Thoughts · EMNLP 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › fine-tuning
full parameter fine-tuning
0.812024
Full Parameter Fine-tuning for Large Language Models with Limited Resources · ACL (1) 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimization › optimizer design
memory-efficient optimizer
0.812024
Full Parameter Fine-tuning for Large Language Models with Limited Resources · ACL (1) 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
memory-efficient training
0.812024
Full Parameter Fine-tuning for Large Language Models with Limited Resources · ACL (1) 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
memory optimization
0.812024
Full Parameter Fine-tuning for Large Language Models with Limited Resources · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation
0.812024
ECON: On the Detection and Resolution of Evidence Conflicts · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
mathematical reasoning
0.712023
Plan, Verify and Switch: Integrated Reasoning with Diverse X-of-Thoughts · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
prompting
0.712023
Plan, Verify and Switch: Integrated Reasoning with Diverse X-of-Thoughts · EMNLP 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic-based reasoning
deductive reasoning
0.612022
RLET: A Reinforcement Learning Based Approach for Explainable QA with Entailment Trees · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › question answering
explainable question answering
0.612022
RLET: A Reinforcement Learning Based Approach for Explainable QA with Entailment Trees · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency
0.212024
Can Language Models Learn to Skip Steps? · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

natural language inference · 0.8memory saving · 0.8large language model prompting · 0.8iterative refinement · 0.8gradient fusion · 0.8fine-tuning · 0.8prompting · 0.7external executors · 0.7sequence-to-sequence model · 0.6reinforcement learning · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Full Parameter Fine-tuning for Large Language Models with Limited Resources
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized Natural Language Processing (NLP) but demand massive GPU resources for training.Lowering the threshold for LLMs training would encourage greater participation from researchers, benefiting both academia and society.While existing approaches have focused on parameter-efficient fine-tuning, which tunes or adds a small number of parameters, few have addressed the challenge of tuning the full parameters of LLMs with limited resources.In this work, we propose a new optimizer, LOw-Memory Optimization (LOMO), which fuses the gradient computation and the parameter update in one step to reduce memory usage.By integrating LOMO with existing memory saving techniques, we reduce memory usage to 10.8% compared to the standard approach (DeepSpeed solution).Consequently, our approach enables the full parameter fine-tuning of a 65B model on a single machine with 8×RTX 3090, each with 24GB memory. 1
Kai Lv 0001, Yuqing Yang 0004, Tengxiao Liu, Qipeng Guo, Xipeng Qiu
ACL (1)3
2024 ECON: On the Detection and Resolution of Evidence Conflicts
abstract
Cheng Jiayang, Chunkit Chan, Qianqian Zhuang, Lin Qiu, Tianhang Zhang, Tengxiao Liu, Yangqiu Song, Yue Zhang, Pengfei Liu, Zheng Zhang. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2024.
Cheng Jiayang, Chunkit Chan, Qianqian Zhuang, Tianhang Zhang, Tengxiao Liu, Yangqiu Song, Yue Zhang 0004, Pengfei Liu 0003, Zheng Zhang 0001
EMNLP6
2024 Can Language Models Learn to Skip Steps?
abstract
Trained on vast corpora of human language, language models demonstrate emergent human-like reasoning abilities. Yet they are still far from true intelligence, which opens up intriguing opportunities to explore the parallels of humans and model behaviors. In this work, we study the ability to skip steps in reasoning—a hallmark of human expertise developed through practice. Unlike humans, who may skip steps to enhance efficiency or to reduce cognitive load, models do not inherently possess such motivations to minimize reasoning steps. To address this, we introduce a controlled framework that stimulates step-skipping behavior by iteratively refining models to generate shorter and accurate reasoning paths. Empirical results indicate that models can develop the step skipping ability under our guidance. Moreover, after fine-tuning on expanded datasets that include both complete and skipped reasoning sequences, the models can not only resolve tasks with increased efficiency without sacrificing accuracy, but also exhibit comparable and even enhanced generalization capabilities in out-of-domain scenarios. Our work presents the first exploration into human-like step-skipping ability and provides fresh perspectives on how such cognitive abilities can benefit AI models.
Tengxiao Liu, Qipeng Guo, Xiangkun Hu, Cheng Jiayang, Yue Zhang 0004, Xipeng Qiu, Zheng Zhang 0001
NeurIPS1
2023 Plan, Verify and Switch: Integrated Reasoning with Diverse X-of-Thoughts
abstract
As large language models (LLMs) have shown effectiveness with different prompting methods, such as Chain of Thought, Program of Thought, we find that these methods have formed a great complementarity to each other on math reasoning tasks.In this work, we propose XoT, an integrated problem solving framework by prompting LLMs with diverse reasoning thoughts.For each question, XoT always begins with selecting the most suitable method then executes each method iteratively.Within each iteration, XoT actively checks the validity of the generated answer and incorporates the feedback from external executors, allowing it to dynamically switch among different prompting methods.Through extensive experiments on 10 popular math reasoning datasets, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed approach and thoroughly analyze the strengths of each module.Moreover, empirical results suggest that our framework is orthogonal to recent work that makes improvements on single reasoning methods and can further generalise to logical reasoning domain.By allowing method switching, XoT provides a fresh perspective on the collaborative integration of diverse reasoning thoughts in a unified framework.
Tengxiao Liu, Qipeng Guo, Yuqing Yang 0004, Xiangkun Hu, Yue Zhang 0004, Xipeng Qiu, Zheng Zhang 0001
EMNLP1
2022 RLET: A Reinforcement Learning Based Approach for Explainable QA with Entailment Trees
abstract
Interpreting the reasoning process from questions to answers poses a challenge in approaching explainable QA.A recently proposed structured reasoning format, entailment tree, manages to offer explicit logical deductions with entailment steps in a tree structure.To generate entailment trees, prior single pass sequence-tosequence models lack visible internal decision probability, while stepwise approaches are supervised with extracted single step data and cannot model the tree as a whole.In this work, we propose RLET, a Reinforcement Learning based Entailment Tree generation framework, which is trained utilising the cumulative signals across the whole tree.RLET iteratively performs single step reasoning with sentence selection and deduction generation modules, from which the training signal is accumulated across the tree with elaborately designed aligned reward function that is consistent with the evaluation.To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to introduce RL into the entailment tree generation task.Experiments on three settings of the EntailmentBank dataset demonstrate the strength of using RL framework.
Tengxiao Liu, Qipeng Guo, Xiangkun Hu, Yue Zhang 0004, Xipeng Qiu, Zheng Zhang 0001
EMNLP1