Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tengxiao Liu
dblp:165/9039
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Language models and text generation · 59% Efficient and distributed learning · 18% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 8% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Can Language Models Learn to Skip Steps? · NeurIPS 2024 Plan, Verify and Switch: Integrated Reasoning with Diverse X-of-Thoughts · EMNLP 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › fine-tuning
full parameter fine-tuning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Full Parameter Fine-tuning for Large Language Models with Limited Resources · ACL (1) 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimization › optimizer design
memory-efficient optimizer |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Full Parameter Fine-tuning for Large Language Models with Limited Resources · ACL (1) 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
memory-efficient training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Full Parameter Fine-tuning for Large Language Models with Limited Resources · ACL (1) 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
memory optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Full Parameter Fine-tuning for Large Language Models with Limited Resources · ACL (1) 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ECON: On the Detection and Resolution of Evidence Conflicts · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
mathematical reasoning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Plan, Verify and Switch: Integrated Reasoning with Diverse X-of-Thoughts · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
prompting |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Plan, Verify and Switch: Integrated Reasoning with Diverse X-of-Thoughts · EMNLP 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic-based reasoning
deductive reasoning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | RLET: A Reinforcement Learning Based Approach for Explainable QA with Entailment Trees · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › question answering
explainable question answering |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | RLET: A Reinforcement Learning Based Approach for Explainable QA with Entailment Trees · EMNLP 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Can Language Models Learn to Skip Steps? · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
natural language inference · 0.8memory saving · 0.8large language model prompting · 0.8iterative refinement · 0.8gradient fusion · 0.8fine-tuning · 0.8prompting · 0.7external executors · 0.7sequence-to-sequence model · 0.6reinforcement learning · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Full Parameter Fine-tuning for Large Language Models with Limited ResourcesabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized Natural Language Processing (NLP) but demand massive GPU resources for training.Lowering the threshold for LLMs training would encourage greater participation from researchers, benefiting both academia and society.While existing approaches have focused on parameter-efficient fine-tuning, which tunes or adds a small number of parameters, few have addressed the challenge of tuning the full parameters of LLMs with limited resources.In this work, we propose a new optimizer, LOw-Memory Optimization (LOMO), which fuses the gradient computation and the parameter update in one step to reduce memory usage.By integrating LOMO with existing memory saving techniques, we reduce memory usage to 10.8% compared to the standard approach (DeepSpeed solution).Consequently, our approach enables the full parameter fine-tuning of a 65B model on a single machine with 8×RTX 3090, each with 24GB memory. 1 Kai Lv 0001, Yuqing Yang 0004, Tengxiao Liu, Qipeng Guo, Xipeng Qiu |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2024 | ECON: On the Detection and Resolution of Evidence ConflictsabstractCheng Jiayang, Chunkit Chan, Qianqian Zhuang, Lin Qiu, Tianhang Zhang, Tengxiao Liu, Yangqiu Song, Yue Zhang, Pengfei Liu, Zheng Zhang. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2024. Cheng Jiayang, Chunkit Chan, Qianqian Zhuang, Tianhang Zhang, Tengxiao Liu, Yangqiu Song, Yue Zhang 0004, Pengfei Liu 0003, Zheng Zhang 0001 |
EMNLP | 6 |
| 2024 | Can Language Models Learn to Skip Steps?abstractTrained on vast corpora of human language, language models demonstrate emergent human-like reasoning abilities. Yet they are still far from true intelligence, which opens up intriguing opportunities to explore the parallels of humans and model behaviors. In this work, we study the ability to skip steps in reasoning—a hallmark of human expertise developed through practice. Unlike humans, who may skip steps to enhance efficiency or to reduce cognitive load, models do not inherently possess such motivations to minimize reasoning steps. To address this, we introduce a controlled framework that stimulates step-skipping behavior by iteratively refining models to generate shorter and accurate reasoning paths. Empirical results indicate that models can develop the step skipping ability under our guidance. Moreover, after fine-tuning on expanded datasets that include both complete and skipped reasoning sequences, the models can not only resolve tasks with increased efficiency without sacrificing accuracy, but also exhibit comparable and even enhanced generalization capabilities in out-of-domain scenarios. Our work presents the first exploration into human-like step-skipping ability and provides fresh perspectives on how such cognitive abilities can benefit AI models. Tengxiao Liu, Qipeng Guo, Xiangkun Hu, Cheng Jiayang, Yue Zhang 0004, Xipeng Qiu, Zheng Zhang 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Plan, Verify and Switch: Integrated Reasoning with Diverse X-of-ThoughtsabstractAs large language models (LLMs) have shown effectiveness with different prompting methods, such as Chain of Thought, Program of Thought, we find that these methods have formed a great complementarity to each other on math reasoning tasks.In this work, we propose XoT, an integrated problem solving framework by prompting LLMs with diverse reasoning thoughts.For each question, XoT always begins with selecting the most suitable method then executes each method iteratively.Within each iteration, XoT actively checks the validity of the generated answer and incorporates the feedback from external executors, allowing it to dynamically switch among different prompting methods.Through extensive experiments on 10 popular math reasoning datasets, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed approach and thoroughly analyze the strengths of each module.Moreover, empirical results suggest that our framework is orthogonal to recent work that makes improvements on single reasoning methods and can further generalise to logical reasoning domain.By allowing method switching, XoT provides a fresh perspective on the collaborative integration of diverse reasoning thoughts in a unified framework. Tengxiao Liu, Qipeng Guo, Yuqing Yang 0004, Xiangkun Hu, Yue Zhang 0004, Xipeng Qiu, Zheng Zhang 0001 |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2022 | RLET: A Reinforcement Learning Based Approach for Explainable QA with Entailment TreesabstractInterpreting the reasoning process from questions to answers poses a challenge in approaching explainable QA.A recently proposed structured reasoning format, entailment tree, manages to offer explicit logical deductions with entailment steps in a tree structure.To generate entailment trees, prior single pass sequence-tosequence models lack visible internal decision probability, while stepwise approaches are supervised with extracted single step data and cannot model the tree as a whole.In this work, we propose RLET, a Reinforcement Learning based Entailment Tree generation framework, which is trained utilising the cumulative signals across the whole tree.RLET iteratively performs single step reasoning with sentence selection and deduction generation modules, from which the training signal is accumulated across the tree with elaborately designed aligned reward function that is consistent with the evaluation.To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to introduce RL into the entailment tree generation task.Experiments on three settings of the EntailmentBank dataset demonstrate the strength of using RL framework. Tengxiao Liu, Qipeng Guo, Xiangkun Hu, Yue Zhang 0004, Xipeng Qiu, Zheng Zhang 0001 |
EMNLP | 1 |