Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Louis H. Howell

dblp:165/9541 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 57% Performance modeling and evaluation · 43%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip › network topology › tree networks
fat-tree network
0.522017
Predicting the performance impact of different fat-tree configurations · SC 2017
Characterizing parallel scientific applications on commodity clusters: an empirical study of a tapered fat-tree · SC 2016
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip › network reconfiguration
network configuration
0.312017
Predicting the performance impact of different fat-tree configurations · SC 2017
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › communication system simulation
network simulation
0.312017
Predicting the performance impact of different fat-tree configurations · SC 2017
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization
0.212016
Characterizing parallel scientific applications on commodity clusters: an empirical study of a tapered fat-tree · SC 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

TraceR-CODES simulation · 0.3trace analysis · 0.2empirical study · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Predicting the performance impact of different fat-tree configurations
abstract
The fat-tree topology is one of the most commonly used network topologies in HPC systems. Vendors support several options that can be configured when deploying fat-tree networks on production systems, such as link bandwidth, number of rails, number of planes, and tapering. This paper showcases the use of simulations to compare the impact of these design options on representative production HPC applications, libraries, and multi-job workloads. We present advances in the TraceR-CODES simulation framework that enable this analysis and evaluate its prediction accuracy against experiments on a production fat-tree network. In order to understand the impact of different network configurations on various anticipated scenarios, we study workloads with different communication patterns, computation-to-communication ratios, and scaling characteristics. Using multi-job workloads, we also study the impact of inter-job interference on performance and compare the cost-performance tradeoffs.
Abhinav Bhatele, Louis H. Howell, David Böhme, Ian Karlin, Edgar A. León, Misbah Mubarak, Noah Wolfe, Todd Gamblin, Matthew L. Leininger
SC3
2016 Characterizing parallel scientific applications on commodity clusters: an empirical study of a tapered fat-tree
abstract
Understanding the characteristics and requirements of applications that run on commodity clusters is key to properly configuring current machines and, more importantly, procuring future systems effectively. There are only a few studies, however, that are current and characterize realistic workloads. For HPC practitioners and researchers, this limits our ability to design solutions that will have an impact on real systems. We present a systematic study that characterizes applications with an emphasis on communication requirements. It includes cluster utilization data, identifying a representative set of applications from a U.S. Department of Energy laboratory, and characterizing their communication requirements. The driver for this work is understanding application sensitivity to a tapered fat-tree network. These results provided key insights into the procurement of our next generation commodity systems. We believe this investigation can provide valuable input to the HPC community in terms of workload characterization and requirements from a large supercomputing center.
Edgar A. León, Ian Karlin, Abhinav Bhatele, Steve H. Langer, Christopher M. Chambreau, Louis H. Howell, Trent D'Hooge, Matthew L. Leininger
SC6